| Literature DB >> 26697119 |
Sarah Cristina Ferreira Freitas1, Ângela d'Avila Harthmann2, Bruno Rodrigues3, Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen2, Kátia De Angelis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia has been associated with decreased blood flow in various organs, leading to tissue damage and dysfunctions. Exercise training (ET) is known to promote beneficial changes in the autonomic nervous system and may have effects on circulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate coronary and renal blood flows and vascular resistances after ET in diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Exercise training; Regional blood flow; Streptozotocin rats
Year: 2015 PMID: 26697119 PMCID: PMC4687277 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-015-0109-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Metabolic evaluations and exercise capacity of the studied groups
| SC | TC | SD | TD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 379 ± 11 | 338 ± 10* | 254 ± 13* | 295 ± 11*,#,† |
| Glycemia (mg/dL) | 152 ± 80 | 160 ± 20 | 351 ± 29* | 345 ± 11* |
| Maximal running test (km/h) | 1.0 ± 0.07 | 2.2 ± 0.02* | 0.9 ± 0.19 | 2.0 ± 0.02*,# |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Sedentary control (SC, n = 8), trained control (TC, n = 8), sedentary diabetic (SD, n = 8), trained diabetic (TD, n = 8)
* P < 0.05 vs. SC; # P < 0.05 vs. SD; † P < 0.05 vs. TC
Hemodynamics evaluations of the studied groups
| SC | TC | SD | TD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 109 ± 2 | 109 ± 3 | 93 ± 3* | 105 ± 2# |
| Cardiac output (mL/min) | 92 ± 7 | 107 ± 8 | 55 ± 5* | 76 ± 7 |
| Cardiac index (mL/min/kg) | 267 ± 19 | 319 ± 33 | 192 ± 15† | 275 ± 35 |
| PVR (mmHg/mL/min) | 1.23 ± 0.22 | 1.14 ± 0.16 | 1.65 ± 0.22 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| TPVR (mmHg/mL/min/kg) | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Sedentary control (SC, n = 8), trained control (TC, n = 8), sedentary diabetic (SD, n = 8), trained diabetic (TD, n = 8)
PVR peripheral vascular resistance, TPVR total peripheral vascular resistance
* P < 0.05 vs. SC; #P < 0.05 vs. SD; † P < 0,05 vs. TC
Fig. 1a Coronary blood flow and b renal blood flow. *P < 0.05. Sedentary control (SC, n = 8), trained control (TC, n = 8), sedentary diabetic (SD, n = 8), trained diabetic (TD, n = 8). Data are reported as mean ± SEM
Fig. 2a Coronary vascular resistance and b mean renal vascular resistance. *P < 0.05. Sedentary control (SC, n = 8), trained control (TC, n = 8), sedentary diabetic (SD, n = 8), trained diabetic (TD, n = 8). Data are reported as mean ± SEM