| Literature DB >> 26696137 |
J Duminil1,2,3, K Daïnou2,3,4, D K Kaviriri1,5, P Gillet2,3, J Loo6, J-L Doucet3, O J Hardy2.
Abstract
Owing to the reduction of population density and/or the environmental changes it induces, selective logging could affect the demography, reproductive biology and evolutionary potential of forest trees. This is particularly relevant in tropical forests where natural population densities can be low and isolated trees may be subject to outcross pollen limitation and/or produce low-quality selfed seeds that exhibit inbreeding depression. Comparing reproductive biology processes and genetic diversity of populations at different densities can provide indirect evidence of the potential impacts of logging. Here, we analysed patterns of genetic diversity, mating system and gene flow in three Central African populations of the self-compatible legume timber species Erythrophleum suaveolens with contrasting densities (0.11, 0.68 and 1.72 adults per ha). The comparison of inbreeding levels among cohorts suggests that selfing is detrimental as inbred individuals are eliminated between seedling and adult stages. Levels of genetic diversity, selfing rates (∼16%) and patterns of spatial genetic structure (Sp ∼0.006) were similar in all three populations. However, the extent of gene dispersal differed markedly among populations: the average distance of pollen dispersal increased with decreasing density (from 200 m in the high-density population to 1000 m in the low-density one). Overall, our results suggest that the reproductive biology and genetic diversity of the species are not affected by current logging practices. However, further investigations need to be conducted in low-density populations to evaluate (1) whether pollen limitation may reduce seed production and (2) the regeneration potential of the species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26696137 PMCID: PMC4806568 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Figure 1Localization of the three populations and sampling scheme in each population. Upper left: localization of the three studied populations of Erythrophleum suaveolens in the Central African forest (grey shaded area represents the potential rainforest area). Upper right: sampling scheme in Cameroon. An exhaustive sampling was conducted in a 47.5-ha plot as represented in the embedded figure. Lower left: sampling scheme in Gabon. Lower right: sampling scheme in DRC. An exhaustive sampling was conducted in a 100-ha plot as represented in the embedded figure.
Parameters of genetic diversity of the different cohorts of the Erythrophleum suaveolens populations
| N | NA | A | H | H | F | F | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | Adults | 177 | 3.63 | 5.03 | 0.628 | 0.531 | 0.155 | 0.003 |
| Seedlings | 162 | 3.53 | 4.94 | 0.606 | 0.488 | 0.195 | 0.122 | |
| Seeds | 499 | 3.51 | 5.02 | 0.624 | 0.498 | 0.202 | 0.157 | |
| Difference among cohorts | NS | NS | NS | NS* | NS | — | ||
| DRC | Adults | 88 | 3.39 | 5.07 | 0.581 | 0.512 | 0.119 | 0 |
| Seedlings | 13 | 3.07 | 4.38 | 0.535 | 0.465 | 0.130 | NA | |
| Seeds | 238 | 3.30 | 4.95 | 0.590 | 0.470 | 0.203 | 0.110 | |
| Difference among cohorts | NS | NS | NS | NS* | NS | — | ||
| Gabon | Adults | 31 | 4.11 | 6.08 | 0.658 | 0.515 | 0.217 | 0 |
| Seedlings | 175 | 4.51 | 5.98 | 0.648 | 0.489 | 0.246 | 0.116 | |
| Seeds | 23 | 3.19 | 4.68 | 0.600 | 0.461 | 0.232 | 0.132 | |
| Difference among cohorts | NS | NS | — |
Abbreviations: AR, Allelic richness (k=24); DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo; F, Inbreeding coefficient (potentially biased by null alleles); F(null), Corrected inbreeding coefficient under a population inbreeding model (unbiased by null alleles); HE, Gene diversity corrected for sample size; HO, Observed heterozygosity; N, Sample size; NA, not available; NAE, Effective number of alleles; NS, not significant.
Differences of genetic diversity among cohorts as tested through a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure (*P<0.05; ***P<0.001); NS* indicates test that were not significant with the two-way ANOVA but that were significant using the paired t-test (see text for details); ‘—' indicates that no test was done for the corresponding parameter as estimates of F(null) per loci cannot be estimated.
Figure 2Average kinship coefficients F between pairs of individuals at different geographical distance intervals (log scale) in each population. Vertical bars are s.e.m. The continuous grey line, the continuous black line and the dashed grey line correspond respectively to the Cameroonian, the Congolese and the Gabonese populations.
Mating system and fine-scale spatial genetic structure parameters of the Erythrophleum suaveolens populations
| 0.0554* (0.0113) | 0.0415* (0.0062) | 0.0477* (0.0347) | |
| 0.0061 (0.0016) | 0.0053 (0.0012) | 0.0070 (0.0081) | |
| 0.690 | 0.780 | 0.740 | |
| 0.800 (0.166–1.00) | 0.830 (0.571–1.00) | 0.780 (0.428–1.00) | |
| 0.782 (0.103) | 0.818 (0.145) | 0.850 (0.177) | |
| 0.816 (0.030) | 0.885 (0.029) | 0.874 (0.046) | |
| 0.098 (0.020) | 0.109 (0.023) | 0.161 (0.033) |
Abbreviation: DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Mating system parameters are based on the genotypes of seeds (Cameroon and DRC) or seedlings (Gabon), whereas fine-scale spatial genetic structure estimates are based on the genotypes of adults.
F1: mean kinship coefficient between individuals at the first distance class.
*Significant F1 values (P<0.001).
Outcrossing rate t as calculated through the relation t=1−2F(null).
t as estimated through a paternal analysis in CERVUS, numbers in brackets refer to the range of t observed in the population using progeny array with a minimum size of six offspring.
tm: multilocus population outcrossing rate (MSF).
tm: multilocus population outcrossing rate (MLTR).
tm−ts: indirect estimation of the presence of biparental inbreeding (MLTR).
Parameters of pollen dispersal in each population
| 1.72 | 0.68 | 0.11 | |
| 0.40 | 0.13 | 0.01 | |
| 23.3 | 19.1 | 9.0 | |
| Global φft | 0.061 | 0.059 | 0.094 |
| 0.112 (58/0.045) | 0.087 (32/0.051) | 0.164 (23/0.057) | |
| 0.110 (57/0.034) | 0.084 (28/0.039) | 0.153 (22/0.044) | |
| 9 | 12 | 7 | |
| Average pollen dispersal distance (in m) | 195 | 346 | 1001 |
Abbreviation: DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo.
As measured in the field.
Obtained by TWOGENER.
Confidence intervals cannot be derived for these estimators.
Obtained by MLTR.
Obtained by KINDIST using an exponential dispersal distribution model.