Literature DB >> 26691969

Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review.

Caroline Nemetz Bronfman1, Guilherme Janson2, Arnaldo Pinzan2, Thais Lima Rocha1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cephalometric parameters and esthetic preferences of a pleasant face for the Japanese population.
METHODS: For the present study, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Initial inclusion criteria comprised studies written in English and quoting cephalometric norms and/or facial attractiveness in Japanese adults. No time period of publication was determined. The quality features evaluated were sample description, variables analyzed and how cephalometric standards or facial profile were evaluated.
RESULTS: Initially, 60 articles were retrieved. From the selected studies, 13 abstracts met the initial inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups; seven articles were included in Group I and six articles in Group II, according to the criteria of evaluation: cephalometric or facial analyses.
CONCLUSION: Japanese are characterized by having a less convex skeletal profile, bilabial protrusion, less prominent nose, more retruded chin and protruded mandibular incisor. Despite living in a society with homogeneous patterns, they seem to get an esthetic preference for white-like features. Therefore, in addition to ethnic normative values, patient's preferences to establish individual treatment plans should always be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691969      PMCID: PMC4686744          DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.043-051.oar

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod        ISSN: 2176-9451


  17 in total

1.  Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.

Authors:  R E Alcalde; T Jinno; M G Orsini; A Sasaki; R M Sugiyama; T Matsumura
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary.

Authors:  L F Andrews
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1976-02

3.  Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults.

Authors:  Shingo Kuroda; Takako Sugahara; Souichirou Takabatake; Hiroaki Taketa; Ryoko Ando; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Takahiro Shimomura; Hideki Ioi; Shunsuke Nakata; Amy L Counts
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.

Authors:  R E Alcalde; T Jinno; M A Pogrel; T Matsumura
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.

Authors:  K Miyajima; J A McNamara; T Kimura; S Murata; T Iizuka
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A cephalometric study of tooth position as related to facial structure in profiles of human beings: a comparison of Japanese (Oriental) and American (Caucasian) adults.

Authors:  P V Reitz; H Aoki; M Yoshioka; J Uehara; Y Kubota
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  José María Shindoi; Yoshiro Matsumoto; Yutaka Sato; Takashi Ono; Kiyoshi Harada
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people.

Authors:  Hideki Ioi; Takahiro Shimomura; Shunsuke Nakata; Akihiko Nakasima; Amy L Counts
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Nuria Castello Branco; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Renata Sathler; Daniela Garib; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging-The utility of multicentre collaborations.

Authors:  Marilia Yatabe; Juan Carlos Prieto; Martin Styner; Hongtu Zhu; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Beatriz Paniagua; Francois Budin; Erika Benavides; Brandon Shoukri; Loic Michoud; Nina Ribera; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Art or Science? An Evidence-Based Approach to Human Facial Beauty a Quantitative Analysis Towards an Informed Clinical Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Harpal Harrar; Simon Myers; Ali M Ghanem
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 3.  Methods of Analysis of the Nasal Profile: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jankowska; Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Maciej Jedliński; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  McNamara analysis cephalometric parameters in White-Brazilians, Japanese and Japanese-Brazilians with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Juliana Moura Storniolo-Souza; Maria Pia Seminario; Célia Regina Maio Pinzan-Vercelino; Arnaldo Pinzan; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.