Literature DB >> 26691286

Combined Approach of Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction in CSAR 2013 and 2014.

Xiaolei Zhu1,2, Woong-Hee Shin2, Hyungrae Kim2, Daisuke Kihara2,3.   

Abstract

The Community Structure-Activity Resource (CSAR) benchmark exercise provides a unique opportunity for researchers to objectively evaluate the performance of protein-ligand docking methods. Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer, molecular surface-based methods for predicting binding ligands of proteins developed in our group, were tested on both CSAR 2013 and 2014 benchmark exercises in combination with an empirical scoring function-based method, AutoDock, while we only participated in CSAR 2013 using Patch-Surfer. The prediction results for Phase 1 task in CSAR 2013 showed that Patch-Surfer was able to rank all the four designed binding proteins within top ranks, outperforming AutoDock Vina. In Phase 2 of 2013, PL-PatchSurfer correctly selected the correct ligand pose for two target proteins. PL-PatchSurfer performed reasonably well in ranking ligands according to their binding affinity and in selecting near-native ligand poses in 2013 Phase 3 and 2014 Phase 1, respectively, although AutoDock Vina showed better performance. Lastly, in the 2014 Phase 2 exercise, the PL-PatchSurfer scores computed for ligands to target protein pairs correlated well with their pIC50 values, which was better or comparable to results by other participants. Overall, our methods showed fairly good performance in CSAR 2013 and 2014. Unique characteristics of the methods are discussed in comparison with AutoDock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26691286      PMCID: PMC5005040          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  48 in total

1.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05.

Authors:  Markus Christen; Philippe H Hünenberger; Dirk Bakowies; Riccardo Baron; Roland Bürgi; Daan P Geerke; Tim N Heinz; Mika A Kastenholz; Vincent Kräutler; Chris Oostenbrink; Christine Peter; Daniel Trzesniak; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Wijnand T M Mooij; Marcel L Verdonk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-11-01

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Xun Li; Yan Li; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity.

Authors:  Christine E Tinberg; Sagar D Khare; Jiayi Dou; Lindsey Doyle; Jorgen W Nelson; Alberto Schena; Wojciech Jankowski; Charalampos G Kalodimos; Kai Johnsson; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  Three-dimensional compound comparison methods and their application in drug discovery.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Xiaolei Zhu; Mark Gregory Bures; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  Discovery of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Binding Proteins in the Escherichia coli Proteome Using a Combined Energetic- and Structural-Bioinformatics-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lingfei Zeng; Woong-Hee Shin; Xiaolei Zhu; Sung Hoon Park; Chiwook Park; W Andy Tao; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  In silico structure-based approaches to discover protein-protein interaction-targeting drugs.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Charles W Christoffer; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  ContactPFP: Protein function prediction using predicted contact information.

Authors:  Yuki Kagaya; Sean T Flannery; Aashish Jain; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson; Richard D Smith; Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Jeanne A Stuckey; Aqeel Ahmed; Maire A Convery; Donald O Somers; Michael Kranz; Patricia A Elkins; Guanglei Cui; Catherine E Peishoff; Millard H Lambert; James B Dunbar
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.