Literature DB >> 18400019

Darwin's naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions.

Jeffrey M Diez1, Jon J Sullivan, Philip E Hulme, Grant Edwards, Richard P Duncan.   

Abstract

Darwin acknowledged contrasting, plausible arguments for how species invasions are influenced by phylogenetic relatedness to the native community. These contrasting arguments persist today without clear resolution. Using data on the naturalization and abundance of exotic plants in the Auckland region, we show how different expectations can be accommodated through attention to scale, assumptions about niche overlap, and stage of invasion. Probability of naturalization was positively related to the number of native species in a genus but negatively related to native congener abundance, suggesting the importance of both niche availability and biotic resistance. Once naturalized, however, exotic abundance was not related to the number of native congeners, but positively related to native congener abundance. Changing the scale of analysis altered this outcome: within habitats exotic abundance was negatively related to native congener abundance, implying that native and exotic species respond similarly to broad scale environmental variation across habitats, with biotic resistance occurring within habitats.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400019     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  31 in total

1.  A test of Darwin's naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel S Park; Daniel Potter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Revisiting Darwin's conundrum reveals a twist on the relationship between phylogenetic distance and invasibility.

Authors:  Emily I Jones; Scott L Nuismer; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora.

Authors:  Marten Winter; Oliver Schweiger; Stefan Klotz; Wolfgang Nentwig; Pavlos Andriopoulos; Margarita Arianoutsou; Corina Basnou; Pinelopi Delipetrou; Viktoras Didziulis; Martin Hejda; Philip E Hulme; Philip W Lambdon; Jan Pergl; Petr Pysek; David B Roy; Ingolf Kühn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evidence that phylogenetically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory.

Authors:  Steven Burton Hill; Peter M Kotanen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  More closely related species are more ecologically similar in an experimental test.

Authors:  Jean H Burns; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Phylogenetic structure predicts capitular damage to Asteraceae better than origin or phylogenetic distance to natives.

Authors:  Steven B Hill; Peter M Kotanen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Fish species introductions provide novel insights into the patterns and drivers of phylogenetic structure in freshwaters.

Authors:  Angela L Strecker; Julian D Olden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Do close relatives make bad neighbors?

Authors:  Daniel Sol; Oriol Lapiedra; Montserrat Vilà
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interpopulation differences in competitive effect and response of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and resistance to invasion by a superior competitor.

Authors:  Paul T Leisnham; S A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions.

Authors:  Rachel M Germain; Jason T Weir; Benjamin Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.