Tokihiro Yamamoto1, Sven Kabus2, Matthieu Bal3, Paul Keall4, Stanley Benedict5, Megan Daly5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA. Electronic address: toyamamoto@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Digital Imaging, Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands. 4. Radiation Physics Laboratory, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy that selectively avoids irradiating highly-functional lung regions may reduce pulmonary toxicity. We report on the first clinical implementation and patient treatment of lung functional image-guided radiotherapy using an emerging technology, computed tomography (CT) ventilation imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A protocol was developed to investigate the safety and feasibility of CT ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy. CT ventilation imaging is based on (1) deformable image registration of four-dimensional (4D) CT images, and (2) quantitative image analysis for regional volume change, a surrogate for ventilation. CT ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy plans were designed to minimize specific lung dose-function metrics, including functional V20 (fV20), while maintaining target coverage and meeting standard constraints to other critical organs. RESULTS: CT ventilation functional image-guided treatment planning reduced the lung fV20 by 5% compared to an anatomic image-guided plan for an enrolled patient with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. Although the doses to several other critical organs increased, the necessary constraints were all met. CONCLUSIONS: An emerging technology, CT ventilation imaging has been translated into the clinic and used in functional image-guided radiotherapy for the first time. This milestone represents an important first step toward hypothetically reduced pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiotherapy that selectively avoids irradiating highly-functional lung regions may reduce pulmonary toxicity. We report on the first clinical implementation and patient treatment of lung functional image-guided radiotherapy using an emerging technology, computed tomography (CT) ventilation imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A protocol was developed to investigate the safety and feasibility of CT ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy. CT ventilation imaging is based on (1) deformable image registration of four-dimensional (4D) CT images, and (2) quantitative image analysis for regional volume change, a surrogate for ventilation. CT ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy plans were designed to minimize specific lung dose-function metrics, including functional V20 (fV20), while maintaining target coverage and meeting standard constraints to other critical organs. RESULTS: CT ventilation functional image-guided treatment planning reduced the lung fV20 by 5% compared to an anatomic image-guided plan for an enrolled patient with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. Although the doses to several other critical organs increased, the necessary constraints were all met. CONCLUSIONS: An emerging technology, CT ventilation imaging has been translated into the clinic and used in functional image-guided radiotherapy for the first time. This milestone represents an important first step toward hypothetically reduced pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer radiotherapy.
Authors: John Kipritidis; Bilal A Tahir; Guillaume Cazoulat; Michael S Hofman; Shankar Siva; Jason Callahan; Nicholas Hardcastle; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Gary E Christensen; Joseph M Reinhardt; Noriyuki Kadoya; Taylor J Patton; Sarah E Gerard; Isabella Duarte; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Mikel Byrne; Rick Sims; Scott Ramsay; Jeremy T Booth; Enid Eslick; Fiona Hegi-Johnson; Henry C Woodruff; Rob H Ireland; Jim M Wild; Jing Cai; John E Bayouth; Kristy Brock; Paul J Keall Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Eunsin Lee; Jing Zeng; Robert S Miyaoka; Jatinder Saini; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Ramesh Rengan; Stephen R Bowen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Chad G Rusthoven; Leah Schubert; Bernard Jones; Austin Faught; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Laurie E Gaspar; Jennifer Kwak; Timothy Waxweiler; Michele Dougherty; Dexiang Gao; Craig Stevens; Moyed Miften; Brian Kavanagh; Thomas Guerrero; Inga Grills Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Wei Shao; Taylor J Patton; Sarah E Gerard; Yue Pan; Joseph M Reinhardt; Oguz C Durumeric; John E Bayouth; Gary E Christensen Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Daniel Rocky Owen; Phillip S Boonstra; Benjamin L Viglianti; James M Balter; Matthew J Schipper; William C Jackson; Issam El Naqa; Shruti Jolly; Randall K Ten Haken; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Martha M Matuszak Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hannah Mary T Thomas; Jing Zeng; Howard J Lee; Balu Krishna Sasidharan; Paul E Kinahan; Robert S Miyaoka; Hubert J Vesselle; Ramesh Rengan; Stephen R Bowen Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 3.039