PURPOSE: Functional-guided radiation therapy (RT) plans have the potential to limit damage to normal tissue and reduce toxicity. Although functional imaging modalities have continued to improve, a limited understanding of the functional response to radiation and its application to personalized therapy has hindered clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively model the longitudinal, patient-specific dose-function response in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with RT to better characterize the expected functional damage in future, unknown patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography scans were obtained at baseline (n = 81), midtreatment (n = 74), 3 months post-treatment (n = 51), and 1 year post-treatment (n = 26) and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated with conventionally fractionated RT or stereotactic body RT. Normalized perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography voxel intensity was used as a surrogate for local lung function. A patient-specific logistic model was applied to each individual patient's dose-function response to characterize functional reduction at each imaging time point. Patient-specific model parameters were averaged to create a population-level logistic dose-response model. RESULTS: A significant longitudinal decrease in lung function was observed after RT by analyzing the voxelwise change in normalized perfusion intensity. Generated dose-function response models represent the expected voxelwise reduction in function, and the associated uncertainty, for an unknown patient receiving conventionally fractionated RT or stereotactic body RT. Differential treatment responses based on the functional status of the voxel at baseline suggest that initially higher functioning voxels are damaged at a higher rate than lower functioning voxels. CONCLUSIONS: This study modeled the patient-specific dose-function response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer during and after radiation treatment. The generated population-level dose-function response models were derived from individual patient assessment and have the potential to inform functional-guided treatment plans regarding the expected functional lung damage. This type of patient-specific modeling approach can be applied broadly to other functional response analyses to better capture intrapatient dependencies and characterize personalized functional damage.
PURPOSE: Functional-guided radiation therapy (RT) plans have the potential to limit damage to normal tissue and reduce toxicity. Although functional imaging modalities have continued to improve, a limited understanding of the functional response to radiation and its application to personalized therapy has hindered clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively model the longitudinal, patient-specific dose-function response in non-small cell lung cancerpatients treated with RT to better characterize the expected functional damage in future, unknown patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography scans were obtained at baseline (n = 81), midtreatment (n = 74), 3 months post-treatment (n = 51), and 1 year post-treatment (n = 26) and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were treated with conventionally fractionated RT or stereotactic body RT. Normalized perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography voxel intensity was used as a surrogate for local lung function. A patient-specific logistic model was applied to each individual patient's dose-function response to characterize functional reduction at each imaging time point. Patient-specific model parameters were averaged to create a population-level logistic dose-response model. RESULTS: A significant longitudinal decrease in lung function was observed after RT by analyzing the voxelwise change in normalized perfusion intensity. Generated dose-function response models represent the expected voxelwise reduction in function, and the associated uncertainty, for an unknown patient receiving conventionally fractionated RT or stereotactic body RT. Differential treatment responses based on the functional status of the voxel at baseline suggest that initially higher functioning voxels are damaged at a higher rate than lower functioning voxels. CONCLUSIONS: This study modeled the patient-specific dose-function response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer during and after radiation treatment. The generated population-level dose-function response models were derived from individual patient assessment and have the potential to inform functional-guided treatment plans regarding the expected functional lung damage. This type of patient-specific modeling approach can be applied broadly to other functional response analyses to better capture intrapatient dependencies and characterize personalized functional damage.
Authors: L B Marks; M T Munley; D P Spencer; G W Sherouse; G C Bentel; J Hoppenworth; M Chew; R J Jaszczak; R E Coleman; L R Prosnitz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alize E H Scheenstra; Maddalena M G Rossi; José S A Belderbos; Eugène M F Damen; Joos V Lebesque; Jan-Jakob Sonke Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Sarah M McGuire; Sumin Zhou; Lawrence B Marks; Mark Dewhirst; Fang-Fang Yin; Shiva K Das Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L B Marks; D P Spencer; G W Sherouse; G Bentel; R Clough; K Vann; R Jaszczak; R E Coleman; L R Prosnitz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-08-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Konstantin Lavrenkov; Judith A Christian; Mike Partridge; Elena Niotsikou; Gary Cook; Michelle Parker; James L Bedford; Michael Brada Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Junan Zhang; Jinli Ma; Sumin Zhou; Jessica L Hubbs; Terence Z Wong; Rodney J Folz; Elizabeth S Evans; Ronald J Jaszczak; Robert Clough; Lawrence B Marks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Brian P Yaremko; Thomas M Guerrero; Josue Noyola-Martinez; Rudy Guerra; David G Lege; Linda T Nguyen; Peter A Balter; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-03-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Katherina P Farr; Jesper F Kallehauge; Ditte S Møller; Azza A Khalil; Stine Kramer; Henrik Bluhme; Anni Morsing; Cai Grau Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Hannah Mary T Thomas; Jing Zeng; Howard J Lee; Balu Krishna Sasidharan; Paul E Kinahan; Robert S Miyaoka; Hubert J Vesselle; Ramesh Rengan; Stephen R Bowen Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Esther M Vicente; Arezoo Modiri; John Kipritidis; Kun-Chang Yu; Kai Sun; Jochen Cammin; Arun Gopal; Jingzhu Xu; Sina Mossahebi; Aaron Hagan; Yulong Yan; Daniel Rockwell Owen; Pranshu Mohindra; Martha M Matuszak; Robert D Timmerman; Amit Sawant Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Daniel R Owen; Yilun Sun; Philip S Boonstra; Matthew McFarlane; Benjamin L Viglianti; James M Balter; Issam El Naqa; Matthew J Schipper; Caitlin A Schonewolf; Randall K Ten Haken; Feng-Ming S Kong; Shruti Jolly; Martha M Matuszak Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-02-07