Literature DB >> 26686969

Contact Lens-Assisted Pull-Through Technique for Delivery of Tri-Folded (Endothelium in) DMEK Grafts Minimizes Surgical Time and Cell Loss.

Massimo Busin1, Pia Leon2, Vincenzo Scorcia3, Diego Ponzin4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of contact lens-assisted bimanual pull-through delivery of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue trifolded with the endothelium inward.
DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two consecutive eyes of 42 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy with or without cataract. INTERVENTION: Standardized DMEK was performed as a single procedure (n = 9) or in combination with phacoemulsification and implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (n = 33) using prestripped donor tissue punched to a diameter of 8.25 mm and then trifolded with the endothelium in. Using a sterile soft contact lens as scaffold, the tissue was loaded in this configuration into a disposable cartridge and delivered into the anterior chamber under continuous irrigation using a bimanual pull-through technique to facilitate spontaneous proper unfolding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, visual acuity 3 and 6 months after surgery, and endothelial cell loss 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Surgery was uneventful in all cases and the time required for the DMEK procedure (from Descemet scoring until final air filling) never exceeded 20 minutes (average, 17.1±1.6 minutes). The only complication observed after surgery was graft detachment (10 of 42 eyes [23.8%]), successfully managed in all cases by single rebubbling within 6 days from surgery. In all eyes with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months (n = 20), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better and the average endothelial cell density (±standard deviation) was 2363.8±82.7 cells/mm(2) (range, 2258-2490 cells/mm(2)). The cell loss calculated as a percentage of the preoperative value determined at the eye bank (range, 2500-2700 cells/mm(2)) was 9.9±2.1% (range, 4.1%-11.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Delivering DMEK tissue, trifolded with the endothelium inward, reduces surgical trauma to donor cells and facilitates spontaneous unfolding, thus minimizing surgical time.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686969     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  "PI-less DMEK": results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy.

Authors:  Eitan Livny; Irit Bahar; Issac Levy; Michael Mimouni; Yoav Nahum
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank.

Authors:  John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Eric Chiang; Kali Barnes; Stephanie Cai; Conan Chen; Anshul Subramanya; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Nicholas J Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Comparison of Tri-folded and Scroll-based Graft Viability in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kali Barnes; Eric Chiang; Conan Chen; John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Stephanie Cai; Anshul Subramanya; Nicholas Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Safety analysis and results of a borosilicate glass cartridge for no-touch graft loading and injection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Silke Wahl; Alisa Katsen-Globa; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method.

Authors:  Young-Ho Jung; Chang Ho Yoon; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sezen Karakus; Mehrnaz Ighani; Puntakarn Noparat; Marjan Tofigh; Eric Chiang; Kali Barnes; Conan Y Chen; Tiffany S Liu; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Authors:  Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Use of four asymmetric marks to orient the donor graft during Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Akiko Matsuzawa; Takahiko Hayashi; Itaru Oyakawa; Kentaro Yuda; Toshiki Shimizu; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Norihiro Yamada; Naoko Kato
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 9.  Component corneal surgery: An update.

Authors:  Prafulla K Maharana; Pranita Sahay; Deepali Singhal; Itika Garg; Jeewan S Titiyal; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.