Literature DB >> 2668672

Potential various appearances of hyperacute rejection in human liver transplantation.

G Gubernatis1, J Kemnitz, A Bornscheuer, E R Kuse, R Pichlmayr.   

Abstract

Out of 81 liver transplantations 2 graft failures were diagnosed to be due to hyperacute rejection. In the first patient the operative procedure was difficult requiring 19 units of blood and plasma, but the graft was functioning well from the beginning until day 1-2, when rapid deterioration occurred. The cross-match was positive. The second patient received a third graft after the first graft had failed due to donor reasons and the second AB0-incompatible graft had been rejected. The third graft transplanted in an uncomplicated operation requiring only 10 units of blood and plasma failed within hours. Both incidences are thought to be a consequence of an immunological assault, consistent with hyperacute rejection. Thus two different clinical appearances could be observed: the so-called delayed type in the first patient and the more classical type in the second patient. For establishing diagnosis of hyperacute rejection two prerequisites were considered essential: 1) histological findings of necrosis and patchy deposits of immunoglobulins, namely IgG, IgM, IgA, C-3 complement component, properdine and fibrinogen, and 2) the proof of at least a short period of an initial function of the graft prior to deterioration in order to exclude primary non-function due to other causes. The low frequency of the appearance of the classical hyperacute rejection and hypothetical causes for the more frequent appearance of the delayed type are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668672     DOI: 10.1007/bf01359560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  10 in total

1.  Liver transplantation.

Authors:  R Y Calne; R Williams
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Total oxygen consumption, ketone body ratio and a special score as early indicators of irreversible liver allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; A Bornscheuer; Y Taki; M Farle; N Lübbe; Y Yamaoka; M Beneking; M Burdelski; M Oellerich
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  [Technic of multiple organ procurement].

Authors:  G Gubernatis; D Abendroth; A Haverich; H Bunzendahl; W D Illner; H J Meyer; W Land; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Signs of hyperacute rejection of liver grafts in rhesus monkeys after donor-specific presensitization.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; W Lauchart; M Jonker; G Steinhoff; A Bornscheuer; P Neuhaus; A A van Es; J Kemnitz; K Wonigeit; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 5.  Progress in and deterrents to orthotopic liver transplantation, with special reference to survival, resistance to hyperacute rejection, and biliary duct reconstruction.

Authors:  T E Starzl; M Ishikawa; C W Putnam; K A Porter; R Picache; B S Husberg; C G Halgrimson; G Schroter
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Liver allograft rejection. An analysis of the use of biopsy in determining outcome of rejection.

Authors:  D C Snover; D K Freese; H L Sharp; J R Bloomer; J S Najarian; N L Ascher
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Humoral rejection of rat hepatic transplants by passive transfer of serum.

Authors:  S J Knechtle; P C Kolbeck; S Tsuchimoto; A Coundouriotis; F Sanfilippo; R R Bollinger
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Evidence for hyperacute rejection of human liver grafts: The case of the canary kidneys.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; Anthony J Demetris; Satoru Todo; Yoogoo Kang; Andreas Tzakis; Rene Duquesnoy; Leonard Makowka; Barbara Banner; Waldo Concepcion; Kendrick A Porter
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  The antibody crossmatch in liver transplantation.

Authors:  R D Gordon; J J Fung; B Markus; I Fox; S Iwatsuki; C O Esquivel; A Tzakis; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Score-aided decision making in patients with severe liver damage after hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; G Tusch; B Ringe; H Bunzendahl; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Aspects of liver transplant pathology with emphasis on rejection and its mechanisms.

Authors:  D G Wight
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.