Literature DB >> 2662625

Score-aided decision making in patients with severe liver damage after hepatic transplantation.

G Gubernatis, G Tusch, B Ringe, H Bunzendahl, R Pichlmayr.   

Abstract

This article describes how a system of scoring risk factors contributes to deciding whether a patient showing signs of liver failure soon after hepatic transplantation should be treated expectedly or should undergo immediate retransplantation. Of 78 adult patients receiving a first liver graft, 25 had evidence of severe damage of the graft and were further investigated. Nine had failure due to irreversible initial nonfunction, and 2 of the 9 died before a second graft was available. Seven were retransplanted with 3 long-term survivors. The other 16 patients showed reversible severe damage and survived without retransplantation. Since retransplantation for irreversible initial nonfunction is successful only in the first postoperative days, there is an urgent need to identify the degree of the observed damage. We devised a scoring system which identified and weighted factors that were predictable in determining irreversibility. Measurements of highest relevance are transaminases, bile volume, the slope of the enzyme GLDH, and the amount of fresh blood and fresh-frozen plasma required for support on the day of operation and the following day. Logistic regressional analysis produced a numerical score which was applied to a decision tree and produced probabilities and utilities to indicate whether reoperation is advisable. We use this scoring system and believe it assists our decisions in the early posttransplant period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662625     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Technic of multiple organ procurement].

Authors:  G Gubernatis; D Abendroth; A Haverich; H Bunzendahl; W D Illner; H J Meyer; W Land; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Signs of hyperacute rejection of liver grafts in rhesus monkeys after donor-specific presensitization.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; W Lauchart; M Jonker; G Steinhoff; A Bornscheuer; P Neuhaus; A A van Es; J Kemnitz; K Wonigeit; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Decision analysis.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Immunosuppression and other nonsurgical factors in the improved results of liver transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; S Iwatsuki; B W Shaw; R D Gordon; C O Esquivel
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Retransplantation of the liver.

Authors:  B W Shaw; R D Gordon; S Iwatsuki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.115

6.  Rapid Flush Technique for Donor Hepatectomy: Safety and Efficacy of an Improved Method of Liver Recovery for Transplantation.

Authors:  C Miller; V Mazzaferro; L Makowka; R D Gordon; S Todo; J Bowman; M Morris; J Ligush; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-02-01       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  Plasma amino acids in liver transplantation: correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  J J Reilly; G M Halow; A L Gerhardt; P S Ritter; J S Gavaler; D Van Thiel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Metabolism during hepatic transplantation: indicators of allograft function.

Authors:  J J Fath; N L Ascher; F N Konstantinides; J Bloomer; H Sharp; J S Najarian; F B Cerra
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  [Changes in intraoperative total oxygen consumption in patients during liver transplantation].

Authors:  N Lübbe; A Bornscheuer; H Grosse; B Ringe; G Gubernatis; W Seitz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Survival from hepatic transplantation. Relationship of protein synthesis to histological abnormalities in patient selection and postoperative management.

Authors:  R L Jenkins; G H Clowes; S Bosari; R H Pearl; U Khettry; C Trey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Apache-II-scoring in the liver transplant recipient.

Authors:  T Bein; H Forst; E Pratschke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  HTK-solution (Bretschneider) for human liver transplantation. First clinical experiences.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; R Pichlmayr; P Lamesch; H Grosse; A Bornscheuer; H J Meyer; B Ringe; M Farle; H J Bretschneider
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1990

3.  Potential various appearances of hyperacute rejection in human liver transplantation.

Authors:  G Gubernatis; J Kemnitz; A Bornscheuer; E R Kuse; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1989

4.  Predicting the viability of grafted livers in rats through a rapid and sensitive metabolic indicator assessed by 31P-NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Yang; H Shimada; T Kobayashi; S Niimoto; G Nakagawara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation.

Authors:  P A Clavien; C A Camargo; R Croxford; B Langer; G A Levy; P D Greig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Donor criteria in hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonas; W O Bechstein; H Keck; H P Lemmens; G Blumhardt; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.