Literature DB >> 26685082

Using Nurse Ratings of Physician Communication in the ICU To Identify Potential Targets for Interventions To Improve End-of-Life Care.

Kathleen J Ramos1, Lois Downey1,2, Elizabeth L Nielsen1,2, Patsy D Treece1,2, Sarah E Shannon3, J Randall Curtis1,2,3, Ruth A Engelberg1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication among doctors, nurses, and families contributes to high-quality end-of-life care, but is difficult to improve.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify aspects of communication appropriate for interventions to improve quality of dying in the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: This observational study used data from a cluster-randomized trial of an interdisciplinary intervention to improve end-of-life care at 15 Seattle/Tacoma area hospitals (2003-2008). Nurses completed surveys for patients dying in the ICU. We examined associations between nurse-assessed predictors (physician-nurse communication, physician-family communication) and nurse ratings of patients' quality of dying (nurse-QODD-1).
RESULTS: Based on 1173 nurse surveys, four of six physician-nurse communication topics were positively associated with nurse-QODD-1: family questions, family dynamics, spiritual/religious issues, and cultural issues. Discussions between nurses and physicians about nurses' concerns for patients or families were negatively associated. All physician-family communication ratings, as assessed by nurses, were positively associated with nurse-QODD-1: answering family's questions, listening to family, asking about treatments patient would want, helping family decide patient's treatment wishes, and overall communication. Path analysis suggested overall physician-family communication and helping family incorporate patient's wishes were directly associated with nurse-QODD-1.
CONCLUSIONS: Several topics of physician-nurse communication, as rated by nurses, were associated with higher nurse-rated quality of dying, whereas one topic, nurses' concerns for patient or family, was associated with poorer ratings. Higher nurse ratings of physician-family communication were uniformly associated with higher quality of dying, highlighting the importance of this communication. Physician support of family decision making was particularly important, suggesting a potential target for interventions to improve end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26685082      PMCID: PMC4779274          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  49 in total

Review 1.  Collaboration between hospital physicians and nurses: an integrated literature review.

Authors:  C J Tang; S W Chan; W T Zhou; S Y Liaw
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.871

2.  Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care.

Authors:  Ruth Engelberg; Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Addressing spirituality within the care of patients at the end of life: perspectives of patients with advanced cancer, oncologists, and oncology nurses.

Authors:  Andrea C Phelps; Katharine E Lauderdale; Sara Alcorn; Jennifer Dillinger; Michael T Balboni; Michael Van Wert; Tyler J Vanderweele; Tracy A Balboni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Nurse and physician barriers to spiritual care provision at the end of life.

Authors:  Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Andrea C Enzinger; Zachary D Epstein-Peterson; Yolanda D Tseng; Christine Mitchell; Joshua Niska; Angelika Zollfrank; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill.

Authors:  C M Lilly; D L De Meo; L A Sonna; K J Haley; A F Massaro; R F Wallace; S Cody
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.

Authors:  Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Bradley D Freeman
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.072

7.  Why is spiritual care infrequent at the end of life? Spiritual care perceptions among patients, nurses, and physicians and the role of training.

Authors:  Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Adaugo Amobi; Andrea C Phelps; Daniel P Gorman; Angelika Zollfrank; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson; Tyler J Vanderweele; Tracy A Balboni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Cutting-edge statistical methods for a life-course approach.

Authors:  Kristen L Bub; Larissa K Ferretti
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Multidisciplinary team training to enhance family communication in the ICU.

Authors:  David J Shaw; Judy E Davidson; Renée I Smilde; Tarane Sondoozi; Donna Agan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Evaluation of end-of-life cancer care in the ICU: perceptions of the bereaved family in Japan.

Authors:  Satomi Kinoshita; Mitsunori Miyashita
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Kenya.

Authors:  Kenneth Mah; Richard A Powell; Carmine Malfitano; Nancy Gikaara; Lesley Chalklin; Sarah Hales; Anne Rydall; Camilla Zimmermann; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Gary Rodin
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.