PURPOSE: Attention to patients' religious and spiritual needs is included in national guidelines for quality end-of-life care, but little data exist to guide spiritual care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Religion and Spirituality in Cancer Care Study is a multi-institution, quantitative-qualitative study of 75 patients with advanced cancer and 339 cancer physicians and nurses. Patients underwent semistructured interviews, and care providers completed a Web-based survey exploring their perspectives on the routine provision of spiritual care by physicians and nurses. Theme extraction was performed following triangulated procedures of interdisciplinary analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models assessed relationships between participants' characteristics and attitudes toward spiritual care. RESULTS: The majority of patients (77.9%), physicians (71.6%), and nurses (85.1%) believed that routine spiritual care would have a positive impact on patients. Only 25% of patients had previously received spiritual care. Among patients, prior spiritual care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.65; 95% CI, 1.51 to 142.23), increasing education (AOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.49), and religious coping (AOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.40 to 16.42) were associated with favorable perceptions of spiritual care. Physicians held more negative perceptions of spiritual care than patients (P < .001) and nurses (P = .008). Qualitative analysis identified benefits of spiritual care, including supporting patients' emotional well-being and strengthening patient-provider relationships. Objections to spiritual care frequently related to professional role conflicts. Participants described ideal spiritual care to be individualized, voluntary, inclusive of chaplains/clergy, and based on assessing and supporting patient spirituality. CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced cancer, oncologists, and oncology nurses value spiritual care. Themes described provide an empirical basis for engaging spiritual issues within clinical care.
PURPOSE: Attention to patients' religious and spiritual needs is included in national guidelines for quality end-of-life care, but little data exist to guide spiritual care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Religion and Spirituality in Cancer Care Study is a multi-institution, quantitative-qualitative study of 75 patients with advanced cancer and 339 cancer physicians and nurses. Patients underwent semistructured interviews, and care providers completed a Web-based survey exploring their perspectives on the routine provision of spiritual care by physicians and nurses. Theme extraction was performed following triangulated procedures of interdisciplinary analysis. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models assessed relationships between participants' characteristics and attitudes toward spiritual care. RESULTS: The majority of patients (77.9%), physicians (71.6%), and nurses (85.1%) believed that routine spiritual care would have a positive impact on patients. Only 25% of patients had previously received spiritual care. Among patients, prior spiritual care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.65; 95% CI, 1.51 to 142.23), increasing education (AOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.49), and religious coping (AOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.40 to 16.42) were associated with favorable perceptions of spiritual care. Physicians held more negative perceptions of spiritual care than patients (P < .001) and nurses (P = .008). Qualitative analysis identified benefits of spiritual care, including supporting patients' emotional well-being and strengthening patient-provider relationships. Objections to spiritual care frequently related to professional role conflicts. Participants described ideal spiritual care to be individualized, voluntary, inclusive of chaplains/clergy, and based on assessing and supporting patient spirituality. CONCLUSION: Most patients with advanced cancer, oncologists, and oncology nurses value spiritual care. Themes described provide an empirical basis for engaging spiritual issues within clinical care.
Authors: R P Sloan; E Bagiella; L VandeCreek; M Hover; C Casalone; T Jinpu Hirsch; Y Hasan; R Kreger; P Poulos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Amenah Babar; Jennifer Dillinger; Andrea C Phelps; Emily George; Susan D Block; Lisa Kachnic; Jessica Hunt; John Peteet; Holly G Prigerson; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: William D Winkelman; Katharine Lauderdale; Michael J Balboni; Andrea C Phelps; John R Peteet; Susan D Block; Lisa A Kachnic; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Genevieve N Thompson; Harvey M Chochinov; Keith G Wilson; Christine J McPherson; Srini Chary; Fiona M O'Shea; David R Kuhl; Robin L Fainsinger; Pierre R Gagnon; Karen A Macmillan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura C Hanson; Debra Dobbs; Barbara M Usher; Sharon Williams; Jim Rawlings; Timothy P Daaleman Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Angelika A Zollfrank; Kelly M Trevino; Wendy Cadge; Michael J Balboni; Mary Martha Thiel; George Fitchett; Kathleen Gallivan; Tyler VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Danielle Rodin; Michael Balboni; Christine Mitchell; Patrick T Smith; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Katherine M Piderman; Mary E Johnson; Marlene H Frost; Pamela J Atherton; Daniel V Satele; Matthew M Clark; Maria I Lapid; Jeff A Sloan; Teresa A Rummans Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; Madison Hyer; Diamantis Tsilimigras; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Adaugo Amobi; Andrea C Phelps; Daniel P Gorman; Angelika Zollfrank; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson; Tyler J Vanderweele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sandra Sanchez-Reilly; Laura J Morrison; Elise Carey; Rachelle Bernacki; Lynn O'Neill; Jennifer Kapo; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Jane de Lima Thomas Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2013-06