Literature DB >> 2668407

Metabolic effects of diltiazem and atenolol: results from a randomized, double-blind study with parallel groups.

T Pollare1, H Lithell, C Mörlin, H Präntare, A Hvarfner, S Ljunghall.   

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind study (n = 58) with parallel groups, the effects of diltiazem (mean dose 329 mg/day) and atenolol (mean dose 67 mg/day) on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in hypertensive patients were compared. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reductions in the supine position were similar and satisfactory, 9/11 and 11/9 mmHg during atenolol and diltiazem treatment, respectively. Insulin-mediated glucose uptake, measured with the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique, decreased during atenolol treatment, from 7.1 to 5.6 mg/kg per min (P = 0.05). but not during treatment with diltiazem (initial value 6.8, final value 6.7 mg/kg per min; P greater than 0.8). Treatment differences between groups were statistically significant (P less than 0.05). During atenolol treatment there was a slight but significant increase in plasma glucose in the fasting state (P less than 0.05) and at the end of an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT; P less than 0.01), and in plasma insulin at the end of IVGTT (P less than 0.05). Despite increased insulin resistance the increase in insulin response was small, suggesting inhibition of insulin release. The insulin peak was decreased by 13% during diltiazem treatment (P less than 0.05). The concentrations of very-low and low-density lipoprotein triglycerides increased, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was unaffected during atenolol treatment. In conclusion, there was no difference between the antihypertensive effects of atenolol and diltiazem, but atenolol decreased insulin sensitivity and altered the lipid profile, thus possibly increasing the risk of diabetes mellitus and theoretically reducing the benefits of blood pressure reduction with regard to risk of coronary heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668407     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198907000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  32 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A B Johnson; R Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Hypertension.

Authors:  G W Ching; D G Beevers
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  A comparison of diltiazem and metoprolol in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.

Authors:  T Hedner; T Thulin; S Gustafsson; S O Olsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Antihypertensive agents, insulin sensitivity, and new-onset diabetes.

Authors:  Pantelis A Sarafidis; Samy I McFarlane; George L Bakris
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 5.  The chronic cardiovascular risk factor syndrome (syndrome X): mechanisms and implications for atherogenesis.

Authors:  S C Bain; P M Dodson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Antihypertensive drugs and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Christos V Rizos; Moses S Elisaf
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 7.  Atenolol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; D Murdoch; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Overview and perspectives of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Diltiazem. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  M M Buckley; S M Grant; K L Goa; D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Differential effects of antihypertensive drugs on new-onset diabetes?

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.