Literature DB >> 2076733

A comparison of diltiazem and metoprolol in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.

T Hedner1, T Thulin, S Gustafsson, S O Olsson.   

Abstract

A double-blind, parallel-group multicentre study has been done to compare the antihypertensive properties, effects on serum lipoproteins and adverse effect profiles of diltiazem and metoprolol given as monotherapy to primary hypertensive patients. 128 patients were included from 10 participating centers. Following a placebo wash-out period of 5 weeks, patients were randomized either to diltiazem or metoprolol treatment according to a forced titration regimen. Each dose was given for a 4-week period in a stepwise regimen. A total of 119 patients, 59 and 60 in the two groups, completed the study. Supine and standing BPs were reduced in a similar, dose-dependent fashion by diltiazem and metoprolol. In the former supine BP fell from 161/101 to 151/91 mmHg at the highest dose level. In the latter patients, supine BP at the highest dose level was reduced from 161/102 to 155/94 mmHg. Target pressures (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or DBP reduction of greater than or equal to 10%) were reached in 63% and 48% of the patients, respectively. HDL-cholesterol was increased in diltiazem-treated patients and decreased in those on metoprolol. Otherwise, serum lipoproteins did not differ significantly between treatments. The incidence and severity of dose-dependent adverse effects did not differ significantly between treatments, although moderate to distressing side effects were reported more commonly by metoprolol-treated patients. Ankle oedema and breathlessness tended to be more common on diltiazem therapy, while tiredness, increased sweating and sleep disturbances appeared to be experienced more frequently by metoprolol-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2076733     DOI: 10.1007/BF00280931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  34 in total

Review 1.  Renal hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists.

Authors:  R D Loutzenhiser; M Epstein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  The effects of antihypertensive drugs on serum lipids and lipoproteins. II. Non-diuretic drugs.

Authors:  R P Ames
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Primary prevention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension. Mortality results from the MAPHY study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; I Warnold; G Olsson; J Tuomilehto; D Elmfeldt; G Berglund
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15

6.  Antihypertensive therapy and lipids. Paradoxical influences on cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  M H Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-02-14       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Effects of diltiazem on serum lipids, exercise performance and blood pressure: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation for systemic hypertension.

Authors:  P E Pool; S C Seagren; A F Salel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-12-06       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Diltiazem versus propranolol in essential hypertension: responses of rest and exercise blood pressure and effects on exercise capacity.

Authors:  J Szlachcic; A T Hirsch; J F Tubau; C Vollmer; S Henderson; B M Massie
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Effects of diltiazem alone and combined with mefruside on cardiovascular response at rest and during exercise, carbohydrate metabolism and serum lipoproteins in patients with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  K L Schulte; W Meyer-Sabellek; L Röcker; R Gotzen; A Distler
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of a low-sodium diet on antihypertensive and natriuretic responses to acute administration of nifedipine.

Authors:  G Leonetti; L Rupoli; R Gradnik; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1987-12
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Antianginal effect of conventional and controlled release diltiazem in stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  K Boman; H Saetre; L G Karlsson; B Ritter; R Marsell; H Wingman; O Lövheim; E W Michaeli; P Löfdahl; S O Olsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 3. Pharmacologic treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  R I Ogilvie; E D Burgess; J R Cusson; R D Feldman; L A Leiter; M G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Conventional and controlled release diltiazem. Bioavailability in healthy volunteers and anti-anginal effects in combination with metoprolol in stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Brorson; A Arvill; P Löfdahl; E Jörgensen; T Fraser; H Larsson; A M Olsson; S O Olsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.