Literature DB >> 2151185

Overview and perspectives of antihypertensive treatment.

A Zanchetti1.   

Abstract

An overview of antihypertensive trials shows that, when absolute rather than relative measures of benefit are considered, a large benefit is derived from treating severe hypertension, whereas in mild hypertension the rate of prevented morbid events is relatively small. However, a greater benefit is observed when a mildly elevated diastolic blood pressure is associated with other risk factors. Thus, antihypertensive therapy in the 1990s needs to be regarded as a component, albeit an important one, in a multiple-strategy approach to prevention and reversal of cardiovascular diseases. At a time when many different classes of antihypertensive agents are available, it is reasonable to ask whether some classes are more suitable than others for the treatment of patients with hypertension and concomitant risk factors such as dyslipidaemias and reduced glucose tolerance. It is well known that thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers have potentially adverse effects on lipid and glucose metabolism, that calcium antagonists and ACE-inhibitors are lipid neutral and that alpha-blockers have potentially favourable effects. Although the real impact of some of these changes is unproven, it is possible that one or more of the metabolic side effects of drugs such as diuretics and beta-blockers may offset some of the benefits of reduced blood pressure. Extensive testing of antihypertensive drugs with a favourable profile can be foreseen in the 1990s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2151185     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199000404-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  22 in total

1.  Treatment of mild hypertension: results of a ten-year intervention trial.

Authors:  W M Smith
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  1989 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension: memorandum from a WHO/ISH meeting.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1967-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Application of prazosin is associated with an increase of insulin sensitivity in obese patients with hypertension.

Authors:  T Pollare; H Lithell; I Selinus; C Berne
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Sensitivity to insulin during treatment with atenolol and metoprolol: a randomised, double blind study of effects on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  T Pollare; H Lithell; I Selinus; C Berne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-29

7.  MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-13

8.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. I. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Treatment of mild hypertension: a five year controlled drug trial. The Oslo study.

Authors:  A Helgeland
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  The risk of hypertension: successes and failures of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.012

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Common medications used by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: what are their effects on the lipid profile?

Authors:  Paul D Rosenblit
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 9.951

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.