Literature DB >> 26681317

Acetyl-Phosphate Is Not a Global Regulatory Bridge between Virulence and Central Metabolism in Borrelia burgdorferi.

Crystal L Richards1, Kevin A Lawrence1, Hua Su1, Youyun Yang2, X Frank Yang2, Daniel P Dulebohn1, Frank C Gherardini1.   

Abstract

In B. burgdorferi, the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS signaling cascade is a distinctive system that coordinates the expression of virulence factors required for successful transition between its arthropod vector and mammalian hosts. Rrp2 (BB0763), an RpoN specific response regulator, is essential to activate this regulatory pathway. Previous investigations have attempted to identify the phosphate donor of Rrp2, including the cognate histidine kinase, Hk2 (BB0764), non-cognate histidine kinases such as Hk1, CheA1, and CheA2, and small molecular weight P-donors such as carbamoyl-phosphate and acetyl-phosphate (AcP). In a report by Xu et al., exogenous sodium acetate led to increased expression of RpoS and OspC and it was hypothesized this effect was due to increased levels of AcP via the enzyme AckA (BB0622). Genome analyses identified only one pathway that could generate AcP in B. burgdorferi: the acetate/mevalonate pathway that synthesizes the lipid, undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P, lipid I), which is essential for cell wall biogenesis. To assess the role of AcP in Rrp2-dependent regulation of RpoS and OspC, we used a unique selection strategy to generate mutants that lacked ackA (bb0622: acetate to AcP) or pta (bb0589: AcP to acetyl-CoA). These mutants have an absolute requirement for mevalonate and demonstrate that ackA and pta are required for cell viability. When the ΔackA or Δpta mutant was exposed to conditions (i.e., increased temperature or cell density) that up-regulate the expression of RpoS and OspC, normal induction of those proteins was observed. In addition, adding 20mM acetate or 20mM benzoate to the growth media of B. burgdorferi strain B31 ΔackA induced the expression of RpoS and OspC. These data suggest that AcP (generated by AckA) is not directly involved in modulating the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory pathway and that exogenous acetate or benzoate are triggering an acid stress response in B. burgdorferi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26681317      PMCID: PMC4683003          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

B. burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease in North America, persists in nature in various reservoir animals (e.g., Peromyscus species) and is spread to new hosts by a hematophagous arthropod vector (Ixodes species) [1, 2]. As the bacterium evolved to a parasitic lifestyle, it sequentially reduced its genome by shedding the genes encoding enzymes used to synthesize essential precursors for RNA, DNA, proteins, lipoproteins and lipids [3]. This effectively locked the bacteria into a host-dependent existence and eliminated the possibility of returning to a “free-living” lifestyle. Successful transmission of B. burgdorferi between its vector and mammalian hosts requires that the bacteria adapt to changing environmental conditions. Bacteria being acquired by the vector modulate gene expression to promote survival in the tick midgut [4, 5]. During subsequent feeding of ticks colonized by B. burgdorferi, the bacteria again alter gene expression to promote effective transmission to a new host [4]. Successful transmission of the bacterium to a mammal requires the expression of genes regulated by the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory system [6]. First described by Hubner et al., the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS signaling pathway coordinates the expression of virulence factors that allow B. burgdorferi to transition between its vector and mammalian hosts [7, 8]. Rrp2 is a response regulator protein that is activated by phosphorylation and associates with the sigma factor RpoN to form a complex that activates RNA polymerase (RNAP) [6, 8]. This Rrp2-RpoN-RNAP complex then activates the expression of the alternate sigma factor RpoS which coordinates expression of key virulence factors that are required for initial infection of the mammalian host [6, 9, 10]. Investigations attempting to identify the phosphate donor for Rrp2 have shown that the cognate histidine kinase (Hk2) and non-cognate Hk1 as well as CheA1, CheA2, and carbamoyl-P were likely not involved [9, 11]. However, the addition of sodium acetate (30, 60, 90 mM) to the growth media resulted in activation of the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade. It was hypothesized that the Rrp2 activation was due to an increase in the intracellular concentration of acetyl-phosphate (AcP) produced by acetate kinase (encoded by ackA or bb0622). AckA converts acetate to AcP, which is subsequently converted to acetyl-CoA (AcCoA) by phosphate acetyltransferase (encoded by pta or bb0589). AcCoA is then condensed to mevalonate for cell wall synthesis [3, 12]. There have been many reports linking AcP to the activation of response regulator proteins [11, 13–16]. However, it is extremely difficult to measure intracellular AcP concentrations in bacteria and Xu et al. were not able to demonstrate that the addition of sodium acetate to the growth medium increased the intracellular concentration of AcP [11, 17]. In this article, we characterize the genes responsible for acetate utilization in B. burgdorferi. While the complete pathway that converts acetate to undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P) is described here, we have focused on the first enzymes in the pathway, AckA and Pta. Because this is the only pathway that allows B. burgdorferi to utilize acetate, mutations in ackA and pta allowed the generation of spirochetes unable to produce AcP or AcCoA. Using these mutants, it was then possible to directly assess the role of AcP in the activation of the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS signaling pathway. Here we demonstrate that the loss of ackA and pta had no effect on acetate-, temperature-, or cell density-dependent regulation of the Rrp2-RpoS-RpoN regulatory pathway. Further, analysis of these mutants suggested that the increased activation of the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade after exposure to acetate is likely due to an acid stress response rather than phosphorylation of Rrp2 by AcP. Based upon the data presented in this study, we conclude that the acetate/mevalonate pathway in B. burgdorferi is used to generate undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P) and subsequently lipid II, a peptidoglycan precursor, and that the intermediate AcP is not involved in the regulation of the Rrp2-RpoS-RpoN regulatory cascade.

Results

Utilization of acetate by B. burgdorferi

Analysis of the genome of B. burgdorferi identified a complete pathway that encodes enzymes capable of converting acetate to C55-P, a peptidoglycan precursor (Fig 1). The genes bb0622 (ackA) and bb0598 (pta) encode enzymes that catalyze the first two steps of this pathway (Fig 1, shaded area). Acetate kinase (AckA) enzymatically catalyzes the conversion of acetate to AcP using a phosphate donated by ATP. Then, phosphate acetyl transferase (Pta) converts AcP to AcCoA which is then condensed to acetoacetyl-CoA and shuttled through the pathway to eventually form lipid II for cell wall biogenesis (Fig 1). In most bacteria, AcCoA and AcP are generated from pyruvate. However, no homolog of pyruvate dehydrogenase has been identified in B. burgdorferi, suggesting that it is not able to convert pyruvate to AcCoA to generate ATP. In addition, acetate has not been identified as an end product of fermentation in B. burgdorferi [18]. It has been previously shown that B. burgdorferi is sensitive to vancomycin, a molecule that binds to and sequesters lipid II (the peptidoglycan precursor ultimately produced by this pathway) [19, 20]. Vancomycin prevents the incorporation of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)-N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc)-pentapeptide into newly synthesized peptidoglycan [19, 20]. Sensitivity to vancomycin in vitro (MICs: 0.5–2 ug/ml) provides experimental evidence that B. burgdorferi synthesizes a lipid II moiety structurally similar to other vancomycin sensitive bacteria [20]. These observations and the lack of genes encoding enzymes for fatty acid oxidation strongly suggest that the proposed pathway for the synthesis of lipid II is the only way to generate AcP and AcCoA in B. burgdorferi.
Fig 1

The putative pathway for the synthesis of undecaprenyl-P (C55-P) in B. burgdorferi.

A schematic diagram showing the proposed pathway for the conversion of acetate to C55-P and its role in cell wall biogenesis. Mevalonate, the intermediate that was added to the plating BSK II to isolate mutants, is highlighted. The genes ackA and pta are highlighted by shadowing.

The putative pathway for the synthesis of undecaprenyl-P (C55-P) in B. burgdorferi.

A schematic diagram showing the proposed pathway for the conversion of acetate to C55-P and its role in cell wall biogenesis. Mevalonate, the intermediate that was added to the plating BSK II to isolate mutants, is highlighted. The genes ackA and pta are highlighted by shadowing.

Initial characterization of the ackA and pta loci

It has been proposed that AcP can act as a global signaling molecule in B. burgdorferi by donating a phosphate to Rrp2 and thereby activating the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS network of genes [11]. To determine the effect of AcP on gene regulation, ackA and pta mutants were constructed in wild-type B. burgdorferi strain B31-A3. In this way, a mutant strain that could not produce AcP or AcCoA by disrupting ackA, and a mutant that could over-produce AcP by disrupting pta, were generated. Previously, it has been shown that over-expression of Pta had an effect on the expression of genes regulated by the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade [11]. Since the purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of AcP as a global regulator, it was desirable to complement ΔackA and Δpta using their native promoters to ensure “wild-type” levels of AckA and Pta. Therefore, primer extension analyses were done on RNA isolated from cells harvested in mid-log phase of growth. Analyses showed (four independent biological replicates) that ackA had only one transcriptional start site, 42 nucleotides upstream of the predicted start codon (packA, Fig 2A). Analysis of pta was not as clear; multiple assays showed that the transcriptional start for pta most commonly mapped 208 bps 5’ to the translational start of pta and inside the upstream gene, bb0588 (ppta2, Fig 2B). The promoter reported by Sze and Li (ppta1, Fig 2B) is located 5’ to the translational start of bb0588 but was not identified in any of the analyses performed [21]. In addition, despite multiple attempts, RT-PCR reactions with primers adjacent to the translational start for pta, failed to detect transcripts spanning the entire length of bb0588 and pta. Fig 2B depicts the transcriptional start reported here as well as the start reported by [21].
Fig 2

Transcriptional start sites of ackA and pta.

(A) Genomic region and sequence indicating the mapped transcriptional start site of ackA (designated packA). (B) Genomic region and sequence including the mapped transcript start sites of pta [designated ppta1 (reported by Sze and Li, [21]) and ppta2 from this report]. The putative -35/-10, the ribosome binding site (rbs) and translational start site are underlined for each gene.

Transcriptional start sites of ackA and pta.

(A) Genomic region and sequence indicating the mapped transcriptional start site of ackA (designated packA). (B) Genomic region and sequence including the mapped transcript start sites of pta [designated ppta1 (reported by Sze and Li, [21]) and ppta2 from this report]. The putative -35/-10, the ribosome binding site (rbs) and translational start site are underlined for each gene. The deletion of ackA and pta was accomplished by homologous recombination using allelic exchange vectors that contained the upstream and downstream regions of each target gene flanking the aacC1 (gentamycin) or aadA (streptomycin) resistance cassettes, respectively (Fig 3A and 3D). Mutants were grown in BSKII plating media, supplemented with 10 mM mevalonolactone. This supplement allowed the mutants to survive by bypassing the need for acetate while providing a key intermediate for the synthesis of C55-P and cell wall biogenesis (Fig 1). ΔackA and Δpta mutants were isolated and screened for plasmid content and insertion of their respective antibiotic resistance cassettes (Fig 3B and 3E). ΔackA and Δpta mutants isogenic to the parent strain were selected for further characterization. Using data from the primer extension analyses, plasmids pCR200 (ackA) and pCR201 (pta) were constructed so that both genes would be expressed from their native promoters and both mutant strains (ΔackA and Δpta) were complemented as described in the materials and methods. The genetic makeup of the mutants and their corresponding complements were confirmed by PCR of genomic DNA (Fig 3B and 3E) and by qRT-PCR (Fig 3C and 3F) (Table 1). Strains ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 were missing plasmid lp25.
Fig 3

Generating the ΔackA and Δpta mutants.

(A) and (D) Schematic representations of the allelic exchange events that were used to delete ackA and pta, respectively. (B) PCR of genomic DNA isolated from B. burdorferi strain B31-A3, ΔackA or ΔackA::pCR200. Lane 1: Hyperladder I, Lanes 2 and 3: the ackA locus was amplified from DNA from strain B31-A3 (lane 2) or ΔackA (lane 3) using primers P1 and P4. Lanes 4 and 5: the gentamicin resistance gene, aacC1, was amplified from DNA isolated from ΔackA (lane 4) or ΔackA::pCR200 (lane 5) using primers P17 and P18. (C) RT-PCR on DNase treated RNA isolated from the designated strains using primers P21and P22. (+ or -) denotes reactions with or without reverse transcriptase. (E) PCR of genomic DNA isolated from strains B31-A3, Δpta and Δpta::pCR201. Lane 1, Hyperladder I, Lanes 2 and 3, the pta locus amplified from genomic DNA from strain B31-A3 (lane 2) or Δpta (lane 3) using primers P15 and P16. Lanes 4 and 5 the streptomycin resistance gene, aadA, was amplified using primers P19 and P20 from DNA from Δpta (lane 4) and Δpta::pCR201 (lane 5). (F) RT-PCR on DNase treated RNA isolated from the designated strains using primers P23 and P24. (+ or -) denotes reactions with or without reverse transcriptase.

Table 1

Strains, vectors, and primers used in this study.

Strains Reference
Borrelia burgdorferi B31-A3 (Low Passage)[39]
Borrelia burgdorferi B31-A3 ΔackA This study
Borrelia burgdorferi B31-A3 Δpta This study
Borrelia burgdorferi B31-A3 ΔackA::pCR200This study
Borrelia burgdorferi B31-A3 Δpta::pCR201This study
Escherichia coli TOP10Invitrogen
Plasmids Reference
pPCR-Script Cam SK(+)Agilent
pBSV2G[40]
pKFSS1[41]
pCR100 (pPCR-Script Cam SK+::ΔackA::aacC1)This study
pCR101 (pPCR-Script Cam SK+::Δpta::aadA)This study
pCR200 (pKFSS1::ackA)This study
pCR201 (pBSV2G::pta)This study
Primer Sequence 5'–3' Reference
1. ackA1-kpnIACTGCTGGTACCAGGTGTTGGCAATTTACTTGGThis study
2. ackA1-xhoIACTGCTCTCGAGGTTATGTGCTTGTTTTTAGTAAGTThis study
3. ackA1-claIACTGCTATCGATTAATTTACAATTTTAAAAACTAAAATCTThis study
4. ackA1-pstIACTGCTCTGCAGTGCAAATGGCTTTGAAGATATTGAGGThis study
5. ackA2-kpnIACTGCTGGTACCGTGGATTTATTCCTGAAAATTATGThis study
6. ackA2-sphIACTGCTGCATGCTAAATTTTTTGGAATTAAATTATAAATGTCThis study
7. ackA-FCAGGGCTTTGGAAATAGAATACAThis study
8. ackA-RGGTCTTCTAGGATTCAATAAGTTTACATGTTATCCThis study
9. pta1-kpnIACTGCTGGTACCTTAATTCTGGCGTTGCTGGTThis study
10. pta1-xhoIACTGCTCTCGAGCGGGAAAAACTATATTGGCCTTAThis study
11. pta1-claIACTGCTATCGATGCCCATTAGCGATCTTTCAAThis study
12. pta1-pstIACTGCTCTGCAGAACCGCATTTGAAATTGACTTThis study
13. pta2-xhoIACTCTCGAGTTTAATGCCAATAAAAATTTAATTAAGAATGCThis study
14. pta2-pvuIACTCGATCGTTAAATGCTTATCATTAAAGCThis study
15. pta-FGTTGTACAAGAAATTTTAAGThis study
16. pta-RCATTACCAATAAAGCTACTCTGThis study
17. aacC1-xhoIACTGCTCTCGAGTAATACCCGAGCTTCAAGGAThis study
18. aacC1-claIACTGCTATCGATTTAGGTGGCGGTACTTGGGTCGATThis study
19. aadA-xhoIACTGCTCTCGAGTACCCGAGCTTCAAGGAAThis study
20. aadA-claIACTGCTATCGATTTATTTGCCGACTACCTTGThis study
21. ackA-RTFTGCAATCACCGCAATAGAAGThis study
22. ackA-RTRGAAAGGCCATGAAAGCCATAThis study
23. pta-RTFTGCAGCTTGATTCAGCCATAThis study
24. pta-RTRCCTTGGCAAAAGCAAATCTCThis study
25. rpoD-RTFGCAGGCTGAAAATTGAAAAAThis study
26. rpoD-RTRCAAGTTCTTTTTGGGCAAGCThis study
27. ospC-RTFTGCGGTTTTACTTGCTGTGAThis study
28. ospC-RTRATTGCATAAGCTCCCGCTAAThis study
29. rpoS-RTFAGGCAATGCAAAAGCAAAAAThis study
30. rpoS-RTRTCGGGTCATATTTTTCAGCAThis study
31. ackA-GSP1GCTTGATCCTCCATGTACAACThis study
32. ackA-GSP2GCTAAGAGTTTTAAGGATTTTThis study
33. pta-GSP1CCCTTTAACTTTTGTAAACTCThis study
34. pta-GSP2CTGGGAAAGAATTAGGATThis study
35. pta-GSP3GCAATTAGAAAATTCTTTThis study

The underlined sequence identifies the restriction site within each primer.

Generating the ΔackA and Δpta mutants.

(A) and (D) Schematic representations of the allelic exchange events that were used to delete ackA and pta, respectively. (B) PCR of genomic DNA isolated from B. burdorferi strain B31-A3, ΔackA or ΔackA::pCR200. Lane 1: Hyperladder I, Lanes 2 and 3: the ackA locus was amplified from DNA from strain B31-A3 (lane 2) or ΔackA (lane 3) using primers P1 and P4. Lanes 4 and 5: the gentamicin resistance gene, aacC1, was amplified from DNA isolated from ΔackA (lane 4) or ΔackA::pCR200 (lane 5) using primers P17 and P18. (C) RT-PCR on DNase treated RNA isolated from the designated strains using primers P21and P22. (+ or -) denotes reactions with or without reverse transcriptase. (E) PCR of genomic DNA isolated from strains B31-A3, Δpta and Δpta::pCR201. Lane 1, Hyperladder I, Lanes 2 and 3, the pta locus amplified from genomic DNA from strain B31-A3 (lane 2) or Δpta (lane 3) using primers P15 and P16. Lanes 4 and 5 the streptomycin resistance gene, aadA, was amplified using primers P19 and P20 from DNA from Δpta (lane 4) and Δpta::pCR201 (lane 5). (F) RT-PCR on DNase treated RNA isolated from the designated strains using primers P23 and P24. (+ or -) denotes reactions with or without reverse transcriptase. The underlined sequence identifies the restriction site within each primer.

The ΔackA and Δpta mutants require mevalonolactone for growth and viability

To generate ΔackA and Δpta, the metabolite mevalonolactone was required as a supplement in the BSKII growth medium. Commercially available mevalonolactone undergoes hydrolysis by water and forms an equilibrium between mevalonolactone and mevalonate at neutral pH. After diffusing into the cell, mevalonate is converted to phosphomevalonate by mevalonate kinase (bb0688) and is then presumed to generate C55-P (Fig 1). Since C55-P is essential for growth, strains ΔackA and Δpta should have an absolute requirement for exogenous mevalonate. The requirement for mevalonate was tested in strains B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 (Fig 4). All strains were grown in BSKII supplemented with increasing concentrations of mevalonolactone (10 nM to 10 mM). The minimum concentration of mevalonolactone that could support growth and viability of ΔackA and Δpta was 100 μM; cells exposed to concentrations below that threshold showed decreased viability, eventually leading to cell death (Fig 4). The addition of mevalonolactone did not appear to effect the growth of wild-type B. burgdorferi and complementation of ΔackA and Δpta resulted in a complete restoration of growth and viability without mevalonolatone in the growth medium (Fig 4).
Fig 4

Growth and survival of B. burgdorferi B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 in the presence and absence of mevalonolactone.

Growth of strains B31-A3, ΔackA, and Δack::pCR200 (A) and B31-A3, Δpta, and Δpta::pCR201 (B) in BSKII supplemented with increasing concentrations of mevalonolactone (0–10 mM, shown in parentheses). Cells were quantified by culture in BSKII plating media supplemented with 10 mM mevalonolactone.

Growth and survival of B. burgdorferi B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 in the presence and absence of mevalonolactone.

Growth of strains B31-A3, ΔackA, and Δack::pCR200 (A) and B31-A3, Δpta, and Δpta::pCR201 (B) in BSKII supplemented with increasing concentrations of mevalonolactone (0–10 mM, shown in parentheses). Cells were quantified by culture in BSKII plating media supplemented with 10 mM mevalonolactone.

Influence of the ackA and pta mutations on RpoS and OspC expression following a shift in growth temperature

Previous studies have attempted to identify potential phosphodonors in B. burgdorferi that activate Rrp2 and stimulate the RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade [9, 11]. B31-A3, ΔackA and Δpta, and their respective complemented strains were assayed for changes in the transcription and translation of rpoS and ospC under conditions that have been shown to activate the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade [4, 5, 22]. One environmental signal/condition known to activate the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade is an increase in temperature (24–34°C). After a shift from 24°C to 34°C, gene transcript levels were assayed by qRT-PCR in B. burgdorferi B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201. Cultures were harvested after 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours (prior to cultures reaching stationary phase) in order to distinguish temperature-dependent RpoS activation from cell density-dependent regulation. rpoS and ospC transcript levels were compared with transcript levels of cells grown at 24°C and normalized to rpoD transcripts. As shown in Fig 5A, when compared with cultures maintained at 24°C, there was slight variation in rpoS transcript between all five strains tested at the early time points (4 and 8h). At 24 and 48h post shift in growth temperature, all five strains had similar increases of rpoS transcription. At 48h post temperature shift, rpoS transcription increased dramatically (~7 to 10-fold) as cells reached a cell density of ~7–9 x 107 cells ml-1. The observed changes in ospC transcript levels followed patterns similar to that observed with rpoS transcripts (Fig 5B). However, there was more variability between strains at the 4 and 8h time points when compared to rpoS transcript levels. Each strain showed increased ospC transcript levels, similar to trends seen in wild-type strains as described previously [9].
Fig 5

Quantitative RT-PCR of rpoS and ospC and immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in strains B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, Δack::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 after an increase in growth temperature.

(A) RT-PCR analysis of rpoS and (B) ospC transcripts in B31-A3,ΔackA, ΔackA::pCR200, Δpta, and Δpta::pCR201, after a temperature shift from 24°C to 34°C. Samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, 24, and 48h and transcript levels were compared to expression at 24°C. (C) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in each strain after a temperature shift and sampling at the indicated time points. Immunoblots were probed with antiserum specific for RpoS, OspC and FlaB. FlaB was included as a protein load control for each assay.

Quantitative RT-PCR of rpoS and ospC and immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in strains B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, Δack::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 after an increase in growth temperature.

(A) RT-PCR analysis of rpoS and (B) ospC transcripts in B31-A3,ΔackA, ΔackA::pCR200, Δpta, and Δpta::pCR201, after a temperature shift from 24°C to 34°C. Samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, 24, and 48h and transcript levels were compared to expression at 24°C. (C) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in each strain after a temperature shift and sampling at the indicated time points. Immunoblots were probed with antiserum specific for RpoS, OspC and FlaB. FlaB was included as a protein load control for each assay. Immunoblot analyses were also used to assess RpoS and OspC synthesis in the five B. burgdorferi strains following an increase in growth temperature. RpoS levels were virtually undetectable at early time points but increased with time as cultures were incubated at 34°C (Fig 5C). OspC could be detected at every time point assayed and increased concomitantly with an increase in rpoS and ospC expression. Although there was minor variation, there were no dramatic differences in protein profiles of the five strains. Each strain increased the RpoS and OspC levels in response to growth at an increased temperature, consistent with previous studies [9, 22]. Overall, these qRT-PCR and immunoblot analysis suggest that AcP, synthesized by AckA, was not required to activate the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade following a temperature shift.

Influence of the ackA and pta mutations on RpoS and OspC expression when B. burgdorferi cells reached stationary phase/maximum cell density

It has been observed that as B. burgdorferi cells reach stationary phase/maximum cell density, the expression of RpoS and RpoS-regulated genes (e.g., dbpA, ospC) increases. To examine the role of the ackA and pta mutations on cell density-dependent regulation of rpoS and ospC, qRT-PCR was used to monitor transcript levels in B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200, and Δpta::pCR201 as the cell density increased. RNA was harvested from cell cultures at approximately 1 x 107, 2 x 107, 5 x 107, 1 x 108, and 2 x 108 cells ml-1. Transcript levels were compared to the initial cell density (1 x 107 cells ml-1) and normalized to rpoD transcripts. At low cell densities, 1–5 x 107 cells ml-1, rpoS and ospC transcripts did not change significantly and no difference was observed between the strains (Fig 6A and 6B). As cells reached maximum cell density, 1–2 x 108 cells ml-1, all strains showed a dramatic increase in rpoS and ospC transcripts. No significant difference was observed between the strains.
Fig 6

Effect of increasing cell density on rpoS and ospC transcript, RpoS and OspC protein expression, and levels of Rrp2 phosphorylation.

(A) and (B) QRT-PCR analysis of rpoS and ospC transcripts in B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, Δack::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 as each strain increased in cell density from 1 x 107 to 2 x 108 cells ml-1. (C) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC levels in each strain as cell density increased. Immunoblots were probed with antiserum specific for RpoS, OspC and FlaB. (D) Phos-Tag® SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of Rrp2 phosphorylation levels in B31-A3 and ΔackA in mid-log and stationary phases of growth. Phosphorylated (Rrp2-P) and non-phosphorylated (Rrp2) proteins are indicated on the right. FlaB was included as protein load control for each assay.

Effect of increasing cell density on rpoS and ospC transcript, RpoS and OspC protein expression, and levels of Rrp2 phosphorylation.

(A) and (B) QRT-PCR analysis of rpoS and ospC transcripts in B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, Δack::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 as each strain increased in cell density from 1 x 107 to 2 x 108 cells ml-1. (C) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC levels in each strain as cell density increased. Immunoblots were probed with antiserum specific for RpoS, OspC and FlaB. (D) Phos-Tag® SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of Rrp2 phosphorylation levels in B31-A3 and ΔackA in mid-log and stationary phases of growth. Phosphorylated (Rrp2-P) and non-phosphorylated (Rrp2) proteins are indicated on the right. FlaB was included as protein load control for each assay. The levels of RpoS and OspC were analyzed by immunoblot in strains B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200, and Δpta::pCR201 at different cell densities (Fig 6C). RpoS levels were low at low cell densities and increased as cells reached 1 x 108 cells ml-1 for each strain tested. OspC could also be detected at low levels at lower densities and increased concomitantly with an increase in rpoS, ospC and RpoS levels. Taken together, these results showed that the mutant strains, ΔackA and Δpta, are able to up-regulate rpoS, ospC, RpoS, and OspC, as cells reached stationary phase/maximum cell density as observed in the wild-type cells. These data suggest the AcP generated by AckA does not affect cell density-dependent regulation in B. burgdorferi. The proposed phosphate donor for Rrp2 is AcP. Phosphorylation of Rrp2 activates RpoN, which in turn up-regulates rpoS and its regulon of virulence genes. qRT-PCR and immunoblot data suggested that deleting the gene (ackA) encoding the only known way to enzymatically synthesize AcP in B. burgdorferi had no effect on temperature- or cell density-dependent gene regulation. This suggested that in ΔackA, the levels of phosphorylated Rrp2 (Rrp2-P) were unaffected by the loss of AckA and AcP. To test this hypothesis, cells were harvested at mid-log and stationary/maximum cell density phase of growth and assayed for the levels of Rrp2-P. As cells transitioned from mid-log to maximum cell density, the ratio of non-phoshorylated Rrp2 to Rrp2-P shifts dramatically in B31-A3 and ΔackA (Fig 6D). More importantly, deleting ackA had no effect on the phosphorylation levels of Rrp2 at different stages of growth, confirming the qRT-PCR and immunoblot data. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that AcP does not play a significant role in cell density-dependent regulation through the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade.

The absence of ackA did not change the effect of exogenous sodium acetate on RpoS and OspC levels

Previous studies have shown that the addition of 20–90 mM sodium acetate at pH 7.0 leads to an increase in both rpoS and ospC transcript and RpoS and OspC protein levels in wild-type B. burgdorferi cells [11, 23]. In those studies, it was suggested that the addition of acetate stimulated the production of AcP via AckA, leading to an increase in Rrp2-P and activating the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade. To assess the effect of exogenous acetate on RpoS and OspC expression, B31-A3 and ΔackA were exposed to increasing concentrations of sodium acetate (0, 30, and 60 mM) at pH 7.0. Both B31-A3 and ΔackA showed increased RpoS and OspC expression when they were exposed to increasing concentrations of sodium acetate (Fig 7A), similar to previous reports. In addition, high concentrations of sodium acetate (30 and 60 mM) slowed the growth of both B31-A3 and ΔackA, while lower concentrations did not affect growth (S1 Fig). Previously, in E.coli, it has been shown that weak permeant acids such as acetate or benzoate can trigger rapid changes in intracellular pH, leading to changes in gene regulation [24]. To assess whether sodium benzoate would elicit a similar response as sodium acetate in B. burgdorferi, B31-A3 and ΔackA were incubated with 20 mM sodium benzoate. Similar to the expression observed with the addition of sodium acetate (Fig 7A), both strains showed an increase in RpoS and OspC levels when 20 mM sodium benzoate was added to the growth medium (Fig 7B).
Fig 7

Effect of acetate on RpoS and OspC expression and Rrp2 phosphorylation.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in B31-A3 and ΔackA in the presence of 0, 30, and 60 mM sodium acetate. (B) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in B31-A3 and ΔackA in the presence of 0 and 20 mM sodium benzoate. In each panel, FlaB was included as a protein load control.

Effect of acetate on RpoS and OspC expression and Rrp2 phosphorylation.

(A) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in B31-A3 and ΔackA in the presence of 0, 30, and 60 mM sodium acetate. (B) Immunoblot analysis of RpoS and OspC in B31-A3 and ΔackA in the presence of 0 and 20 mM sodium benzoate. In each panel, FlaB was included as a protein load control.

ackA and pta are required for infectivity in immunocompetent mice

To assess the infectivity of B31-A3, ΔackA, and Δpta, each strain was inoculated by intradermal injection into five RML mice (a closed colony of Swiss-Webster mice used at the RML since 1937) (3 separate replicates for a total of 15 mice injected per strain). B31-A3 was isolated from all of the mouse tissues tested (ankle joint, bladder, and skin). However, ΔackA and Δpta were non-infectious and were not isolated from any of the tissues tested. As previously shown, the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade appears to function normally in ΔackA and Δpta (Figs 5 and 6), so the inability of these strains to colonize mice is most likely due to other factors independent of Rrp2-RpoN- RpoS-dependent regulation. Because ΔackA and Δpta require mevalonolactone for survival in vitro, it is possible that the inability to colonize a mouse is due to very low levels of mevalonate in blood and tissue. We have previously shown that these mutants require a minimum of 100 μM mevalanolactone to survive in vitro (Fig 4). While the levels of mevalonate are difficult to assess in mice, experimental data has shown that the mevalonate concentrations in humans range from 28–43 nM, well below the levels required for the survival of ΔackA and Δpta [25], (http://www.hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB00227).The inability of these mutants to survive in vivo is most likely due to low levels of mevalonate in the host rather than a direct result of mutations in ackA or pta affecting gene regulation through the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade.

Discussion

Acetate, AcP, and AcCoA are key metabolites in central metabolism, cell signaling and gene regulation in many eukaryotes, prokaryotes and some species of Archaea [16, 26, 27]. Most commonly, these molecules are produced during fermentation (acetogenesis). Typically, pyruvate dehydrogenase converts pyruvate to AcCoA and NAD+, with AcCoA being converted to AcP by phosphate acetyltransferase (Pta) and to acetate by acetate kinase (AckA) [16]. While Borrelia species have ackA and pta homologs, they do not appear to be using Pta and AckA for acetogenesis. There are several lines of evidence to support this conclusion. First, B. burgdorferi are homo-fermenters catabolizing glucose to lactate with no production of acetate [28, 29]. Second, they do not harbor a gene encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase. Third, they do not harbor genes encoding pyruvate oxidase or pyruvate formate lyase, which are enzymes capable of generating AcCoA from pyruvate. Finally, they harbor no genes encoding proteins for β-oxidation of fatty acids or a TCA cycle to generate and consume AcCoA for energy. Taken together, these data suggest a different role for ackA and pta in B. burgdorferi. The utilization or activation of acetate in Archaea or Bacteria involves four possible pathways. In acetoclastic methanogens (e.g.,genera Methnosarcina), AckA, Pta and CO dehydrogenase/AcCoA synthase convert acetate to CO2 and CH4 [26]. Acetate uptake/utilization in Bacteria can be accomplished using: (i) irreversible AcCoA synthetase (AMP-forming) that generates AcCoA in a two-step reaction; (ii) irreversible AcCoA synthetase (ADP-forming) in a single step; or (iii) via the the Ack-Pta pathway. The B. burgdorferi genome does not contain genes annotated as AcCoA synthetase, indicating that acetate activation requires AckA and Pta. Due to the limited metabolic capabilities of B. burgdorferi, AcCoA, generated by these enzymes, appears to be used exclusively for the synthesis of mevalonate and activated isoprenoids. Ultimately, these isoprene units are condensed to C55-P for cell wall biogenesis (see Fig 1). The genome of B. burgdorferi harbors genes encoding enzymes for the complete synthesis of C55-P, lipid I, lipid II and peptidoglycan. While the enzymes required for the completion of the final steps of this pathway have not been characterized experimentally, evidence suggests that the downstream portion of the pathway is intact and functions as annotated. Lipid II molecules are susceptible to certain antibiotics, such as vancomycin, which binds and disrupts lipid II function, leading to cell death in bacteria containing this structure [20]. B. burgdorferi is sensitive to vancomycin and exposure to the drug disrupts cell integrity [19, 30]. Bacteria require significant amounts of lipid II for cell wall biosynthesis and growth, synthesizing up to 2 x 105 copies of C55-P per cell [31, 32]. Using the pathway described above, B. burgdorferi uses an estimated 66 ATPs to synthesize one lipid II molecule representing a huge investment in energy to produce the required amount of this essential lipid [20, 31, 32]. The role of acetate in cell wall biogenesis in B. burgdorferi seemed to be quite clear. However, recent studies suggested a role for AcP in the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS regulatory cascade [11, 23]. It had been proposed that low molecular weight phosphate donors, such as AcP, might play an important role in Rrp2-dependent regulation by directly phosphorylating Rrp2 independent of its cognate histidine kinase Hk2 [9, 11]. Previous experiments attempted to manipulate the intracellular concentration of AcP by adding sodium acetate to the growth media [11, 23]. In those studies, increasing concentrations of sodium acetate stimulated the synthesis of RpoS and OspC, suggesting that this is the case. However, it was not possible to measure the intracellular AcP concentration to confirm that exogenous acetate was responsible for the observed increase in RpoS and OspC. AcP is a high energy form of phosphate and possesses a higher energy of hydrolysis than ATP [16]. Several studies have investigated the role of AcP in signal transduction via response regulator proteins [13, 15, 33]. In those reports, AcP acts as a high energy phosphate donor to response regulator proteins in vitro. However, under in vivo conditions, the contribution of AcP to response regulator activation is seen only when cognate histidine kinases are not present [i.e., null mutations and/or under very specific growth conditions] [16, 34]. Additionally, E.coli has multiple pathways that use or generate AcCoA and AcP, making it difficult to study the effects of AcP on global regulation [16]. This is not the case with B. burgdorferi. Due to its limited metabolic capabilities, AcP and AcCoA can only be derived from the linear pathway that synthesizes C55-P for cell wall assembly. To better understand the role of AcP in cell signaling in B. burgdorferi, ackA or pta was deleted in strain B31-A3. These mutants were selected by including mevalonolactone, an intermediate in the C55-P pathway, in the growth media. Growth experiments confirmed that ΔackA and Δpta had an absolute requirement for mevalonate and established that these genes were essential for the replication and viability of B. burgdorferi. More importantly, the strains allowed the evaluation of the putative role of AcP in mutants which are unable to synthesize AcPackA) or could overproduce AcPpta) while maintaining a genetic background in which the cognate histidine kinase (Hk2) for Rrp2 was intact. To analyze the role of AcP in cell signaling through the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade, experiments were conducted under conditions known to activate expression of the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS-dependent genes. RpoS and its regulon has been shown to be activated in response to increases in temperature (23–34°C) and as cells reach maximum cell density (~2–3 X 108 cells ml-1) in vitro [4, 10, 35]. These laboratory conditions are meant to mimic conditions the spirochete encounters as it transitions from its tick vector to a mammalian host. When B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200, and Δpta::pCR201 were exposed to a change in temperature or as the cells approached and reached maximum cell density, no significant differences were observed in the transcripts or the protein levels for rpoS, ospC, RpoS and OspC. In every case, the genes and proteins were activated similarly to wild-type cells, suggesting the AckA and Pta were not directly involved in these regulatory signals. However, there are several tiers of transcriptional, translational and post-translational regulation on rpoS, ospC, RpoS and OspC after Rrp2 is initially phosphorylated [7, 9, 36–38]. To complete these studies, we directly assayed the levels of Rrp2-P in the wild-type and ΔackA strains as cells reached maximum cell density. No differences were observed in the ratio of Rrp2 and Rrp2-P in B31-A3 or ΔackA, suggesting that AcP was not required for phosphorylation of Rrp2. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that AckA and Pta, or the products of their enzymatic activity (AcP and AcCoA), do not appear to be required to modulate the levels of Rrp2-P or to activate the Rrp2-RpoN-RpoS cascade under the conditions tested. Xu et al. used high concentrations of acetate in B. burgdorferi to attempt to influence the intracellular concentration of AcP and assess its potential as a small molecular weight phosphate donor for Rrp2 [11]. When high concentrations of acetate were added to the growth medium, an increase in RpoS and OspC was observed and attributed to increased levels of cytoplasmic AcP. However, when strains B31-A3 and ΔackA were exposed to high concentrations (30 and 60 mM) of sodium acetate, production of RpoS and OspC were the same in both strains. These data raised a fascinating question. If high concentrations of sodium acetate increased the production of RpoS and OspC independent from the intracellular concentration of AcP, what was the effect being observed? Wilks and Slonczewski, using GFP and YFP gene fusions, were able to show that the addition of high concentrations of sodium acetate (20mM) to these E. coli reporter strains triggered a very rapid fall in intracellular pH (7.5–5.5) [24]. Sodium benzoate elicited a similar response in the E.coli strains tested, showing that the intracellular pH did not recover from exposure to permeant organic acids. When B31-A3 and ΔackA cells were exposed to 20 mM sodium benzoate, an increase in the synthesis of RpoS and OspC was observed in both strains, similar to the increase that was observed with the addition of sodium acetate. Therefore, we believe that the addition of sodium acetate to B. burgdorferi is not triggering increased levels of RpoS and OspC via AcP, but instead that weak permeant acids are initiating a pH/acid stress response modulated by increased levels of RpoS. Currently, we are investigating the mechanism responsible for the regulation of the acid stress response in B. burgdorferi.

Experimental Procedures

Bacterial Strains, Culture Conditions and Reagents

E. coli was used for cloning and plasmid maintenance. B. burgdorferi strain B31-A3 [39] and derivatives were grown in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly medium (BSKII) at pH7.6 or pH6.8 at 34°C unless stated otherwise. Spirochetes were enumerated by dark-field microscopy. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: chloramphenicol and gentamicin at 20 μg ml-1, streptomycin at 50 μg ml-1, and spectinomycin at 100 μg ml-1. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO) unless stated otherwise.

Generation of B31-A3ΔackA (bb0622) and B31-A3Δpta (bb0589) Mutants and Complementing Vectors

Approximately 0.6 kb of DNA 5’ and 3’ of ackA (bb0622) or pta (bb0589) open reading frames were amplified by PCR using primers 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 for ackA and 9 & 10 and 11 & 12 for pta (Table 1). The aacC1 and aadA genes, including the flgB promoter, were amplified by PCR from pBSV2G or pKFSS1 respectively, using primers 17 & 18 or 19 & 20 (Table 1). To generate pCR100 (pPCR-Script Cam::ΔackA::aacC1) and pCR101 (pPCR-Script Cam::Δpta::aadA) for allelic exchange, the upstream region, antibiotic resistance cassette (flgBp-aacC1 for ΔackA or flgBp-aadA for Δpta) and downstream region of each targeted gene were sequentially cloned into pPCR-Script Cam SK(+) (Agilent Technologies, Cedar Creek, TX) using appropriate restriction enzymes. Relevant plasmid sequences were confirmed by sequencing (ACGT Inc., Wheeling, IL). Wild type B. burgdorferi was transformed with pCR100 or pCR101 as previously described [39] and transformants were selected by plating in BSKII medium supplemented with 10 mM mevalonolactone and the appropriate antibiotic. Antibiotic resistance cassette insertion sites were confirmed by PCR using primers 7 & 8 (ΔackA) or 15 & 16 (Δpta) (Table 1). The B31-A3ΔackA and B31-A3Δpta strains, subsequently referred to as ΔackA and Δpta respectively, were complemented using pCR200 (pKFSS1::ackA) or pCR201 (pBSV2G::pta) respectively. Briefly, ackA and 600 bp of DNA 5’ of the coding region, or the pta gene and 423 bp of DNA 5’ to the coding region were amplified by PCR using primers 5 & 6 or 13 & 14 (Table 1) and cloned into appropriately digested pKFSS1 [41] or pBSV2G [40], respectively. The resulting plasmids, pCR200 or pCR201, were transformed into ΔackA or Δpta as previously described and transformants were plated in BSKII medium (lacking mevalonolactone) and containing the appropriate antibiotics. PCR and sequencing (ACGT Inc.) was used to confirm both strains.

Mevalonolactone Dependence, Temperature Shift, Cell Density and Acid Stress Experiments

B31-A3, ΔackA, Δpta, ΔackA::pCR200 and Δpta::pCR201 were analyzed for their ability to survive and replicate in BSKII media with or without mevalonolactone as well as to determine the minimum mevalonolactone concentration required for growth. Cultures were grown in 50 ml BSKII (+10 mM mevalonolactone) to mid-logarithmic phase and cells were washed three times with HN buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl) to remove residual mevalonolactone. Equivalent spirochete numbers were inoculated into BSKII media containing varying concentrations of mevalonolactone. Growth and survival was determined using viable cell counts, assayed by plating in BSKII (+10mM mevalonolactone) solid media. Temperature shift experiments were performed as previously described with minor modifications [42, 43]. Briefly, B. burgdorferi strains were grown in 10 ml of BSK II (pH 6.8) at 23°C under a microaerobic atmosphere (90% N2, 5% CO2, 5% O2) to mid-log phase and expanded to 500 ml at 1 x 106 cells ml-1. Cultures were grown to 1 x 107 cells ml-1 and then shifted to 34°C. Samples were harvested for RNA and protein analysis at 0, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h time points following the temperature shift. The pH of the culture medium after 48 h of incubation was 6.8. For cell density experiments, B. burgdorferi cultures were grown in 10 ml of BSK II medium at pH 6.8 under a microaerobic atmosphere to mid log phase and subsequently expanded to 500 ml at 1 x 106 cells ml-1. Aliquots were harvested for RNA and protein analysis at cell densities of 1 x 107 cells ml-1, 2 x 107 cells ml-1, 5 x 107 cells ml-1, 1 x 108 cells ml-1, and 2 x 108 cells ml-1. Two 10 ml samples were harvested at each time point or cell density for RNA and protein analysis. Growth of B. burgdorferi in increasing concentrations of extracellular sodium acetate or sodium benzoate was performed as previously described [11]. Briefly, B. burgdorferi B31-A3 and ΔackA were grown from frozen stock in BSK II containing 10 mM mevalonolactone at pH 6.8 under microaerobic conditions. Cells were subcultured to a density of approximately 2 x 106 cells ml-1 in BSK II containing 10 mM mevalonolactone and either increasing concentrations of sodium acetate (0, 30, and 60 mM) or sodium benzoate (0 and 20 mM). B31-A3 and ΔackA cells were incubated with acetate or benzoate until cell density reached approximately 2 x 107 cells ml-1 at which point each culture was harvested for western blot analysis (described below).

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Samples for RNA analysis were harvested at 4°C by centrifugation, the cell pellet resuspended in Trizol solution and the RNA extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). RNA samples were subsequently treated with TURBO DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a one-step QuantiTect SYBR Green kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. To confirm gene deletions, ackA and pta transcripts were assayed in WT, ΔackA, Δpta and their complements using primers 21–24 (Table 1). To amplify rpoD, ospC and rpoS transcripts, primers 25–30 were used (Table 1). cDNA was synthesized at 42°C for 30 minutes and denatured at 95°C for 15 minutes. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed under standard conditions on a LightCycler (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). The LightCycler software was used for the analysis of fold changes and rpoD normalization.

SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis, Immunoblot and Phos-tag analysis

Protein samples were prepared by harvesting cells by centrifugation (8,000 x g, 10 min, 4○C), washing the cell pellet with HN buffer and lysis in B-per lysis solution (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was collected. Protein concentration was quantified by absorbance and equivalent amounts were loaded onto 4–20% Tris-HEPES polyacrylamide gels (NuSep, Bogart, GA). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen) and immunoblot analysis was performed as previously described (Burtnick et al. 2007). Proteins were visualized with the ECLTM Plus Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). Primary antibodies were used at the following concentrations: α-RpoS polyclonal antiserum (1:200), α-OspC polyclonal antiserum (1:1000), α -flagellin monoclonal antibody (H9724 1:50) [44], Rrp2 polyclonal antiserum (1:200) [22]. Rrp2 phosphorylation was assessed using Phos-tag analysis [45]. Bacterial cells grown to mid-log and stationary phase as described above and were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellets were resuspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer and loaded onto gels containing 75 μM Phos-TagTM acrylamide and 150 μM Zn(NO3)2. Following electrophoresis, the gels were washed 15 min in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 1mM EDTA), and 15 min in transfer buffer without EDTA before transferring to a nitrocellulose membrane.

Promoter Analysis of ackA and pta using 5’-primer Extension Analyses

Primer extension analysis was performed using the 5’ RACE kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cDNA synthesis was performed using gene specific primers (GSP) listed in Table 1. cDNA was purified and used in TdT reactions that added a poly-cytosine tail to the 5’ end of the cDNA. Tailed cDNA was subsequently used in PCR reactions with an internal GSP primer (ackA-GSP2 or pta-GSP2—Table 1) and an abridged anchor primer provided by Invitrogen. PCR products were analyzed on an agarose gel, purified on a Qiaquick PCR purification column (Qiagen) and subjected to Sanger sequencing (ACGT Inc.).

Analysis of Infectivity of ΔackA and Δpta in a Murine Model

B. burgdorferi B31-A3 and mutant strains were grown to mid log phase and three groups of five female RML mice were obtained from the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Veterinary Branch (RMVB) breeding facility. Each mouse was inoculated by intradermal injection with an inoculum of 5 x 105 cells grown in BSKII. The mice used in this study were monitored regularly with health checks occurring twice daily. Inocula were plated to confirm dose and plasmid content. Three weeks post-inoculation, ear punch biopsies were performed. Seven to 14 days following initial screening, mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane and, while under anesthesia, were euthanized humanely by cervical dislocation. Tissues from the ear, bladder, liver, and ankle joint tissues were cultured in BSK II containing 10 mM mevalonolactone to test for spirochete positive tissue. Mouse infection studies were carried out in accordance with guidelines of the National Institutes of Health. All animal work was done according to protocols approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number 2014–021).

Effect of acetate on growth of B. burgdorferi.

(A) Growth of B31-A3 and (B) ΔackA, respectively in the presence of 0, 30, and 60 mM exogenously added sodium acetate. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  44 in total

Review 1.  Lyme borreliosis: relation of its causative agent to its vectors and hosts in North America and Europe.

Authors:  R S Lane; J Piesman; W Burgdorfer
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Carbohydrate metabolism in Spirochaeta recurrentis. 4. Some properties of hexokinase and lactic dehydrogenase in spirochaetes.

Authors:  P J Smith
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Rrp2, a sigma54-dependent transcriptional activator of Borrelia burgdorferi, activates rpoS in an enhancer-independent manner.

Authors:  Jon S Blevins; Haijun Xu; Ming He; Michael V Norgard; Larry Reitzer; X Frank Yang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Temporal changes in outer surface proteins A and C of the lyme disease-associated spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, during the chain of infection in ticks and mice.

Authors:  T G Schwan; J Piesman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Physiologically relevant small phosphodonors link metabolism to signal transduction.

Authors:  Alan J Wolfe
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  RpoS is not central to the general stress response in Borrelia burgdorferi but does control expression of one or more essential virulence determinants.

Authors:  Melissa J Caimano; Christian H Eggers; Karsten R O Hazlett; Justin D Radolf
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes.

Authors:  B M Lange; T Rujan; W Martin; R Croteau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Intracellular butyryl phosphate and acetyl phosphate concentrations in Clostridium acetobutylicum and their implications for solvent formation.

Authors:  Yinsuo Zhao; Christopher A Tomas; Fredrick B Rudolph; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis; George N Bennett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Profiling of temperature-induced changes in Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression by using whole genome arrays.

Authors:  Caroline Ojaimi; Chad Brooks; Sherwood Casjens; Patricia Rosa; Abdallah Elias; Alan Barbour; Algis Jasinskas; Jorge Benach; Laura Katona; Justin Radolf; Melissa Caimano; Jon Skare; Kristen Swingle; Darrin Akins; Ira Schwartz
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  In vitro activity of vancomycin against the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  L L Dever; J H Jorgensen; A G Barbour
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  13 in total

1.  Gene Regulation During the Enzootic Cycle of the Lyme Disease Spirochete.

Authors:  D Scott Samuels; Leah R N Samuels
Journal:  For Immunopathol Dis Therap       Date:  2016

2.  Quantitative Analysis of Intracellular Response Regulator Phosphatase Activity of Histidine Kinases.

Authors:  Rong Gao; Ann M Stock
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Insight into the Dual Functions of Bacterial Enhancer-Binding Protein Rrp2 of Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Yanping Yin; Youyun Yang; Xuwu Xiang; Qian Wang; Zhang-Nv Yang; Jon Blevins; Yongliang Lou; X Frank Yang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The Borrelia burgdorferi Glycosaminoglycan Binding Protein Bgp in the B31 Strain Is Not Essential for Infectivity despite Facilitating Adherence and Tissue Colonization.

Authors:  Samantha Schlachter; Janakiram Seshu; Tao Lin; Steven Norris; Nikhat Parveen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Plasticity in early immune evasion strategies of a bacterial pathogen.

Authors:  Quentin Bernard; Alexis A Smith; Xiuli Yang; Juraj Koci; Shelby D Foor; Sarah D Cramer; Xuran Zhuang; Jennifer E Dwyer; Yi-Pin Lin; Emmanuel F Mongodin; Adriana Marques; John M Leong; Juan Anguita; Utpal Pal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Short-Chain Fatty Acids Alter Metabolic and Virulence Attributes of Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Ying-Han Lin; Yue Chen; Trever C Smith; S L Rajasekhar Karna; J Seshu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 7.  Genetic Manipulation of Borrelia.

Authors:  Patricia A Rosa; Mollie W Jewett
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.081

8.  Gene Regulation and Transcriptomics.

Authors:  D Scott Samuels; Meghan C Lybecker; X Frank Yang; Zhiming Ouyang; Travis J Bourret; William K Boyle; Brian Stevenson; Dan Drecktrah; Melissa J Caimano
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.081

9.  Weak Organic Acids Decrease Borrelia burgdorferi Cytoplasmic pH, Eliciting an Acid Stress Response and Impacting RpoN- and RpoS-Dependent Gene Expression.

Authors:  Daniel P Dulebohn; Crystal L Richards; Hua Su; Kevin A Lawrence; Frank C Gherardini
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Global Profiling of Lysine Acetylation in Borrelia burgdorferi B31 Reveals Its Role in Central Metabolism.

Authors:  Sébastien Bontemps-Gallo; Charlotte Gaviard; Crystal L Richards; Takfarinas Kentache; Sandra J Raffel; Kevin A Lawrence; Joseph C Schindler; Joseph Lovelace; Daniel P Dulebohn; Robert G Cluss; Julie Hardouin; Frank C Gherardini
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.