Literature DB >> 26680661

Cas9 Variants Expand the Target Repertoire in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Ryan T Bell1, Becky X H Fu2, Andrew Z Fire3.   

Abstract

The proliferation of CRISPR/Cas9-based methods in Caenorhabditis elegans has enabled efficient genome editing and precise genomic tethering of Cas9 fusion proteins. Experimental designs using CRISPR/Cas9 are currently limited by the need for a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in the target with the sequence NGG. Here we report the characterization of two modified Cas9 proteins in C. elegans that recognize NGA and NGCG PAMs. We found that each variant could stimulate homologous recombination with a donor template at multiple loci and that PAM specificity was comparable to that of wild-type Cas9. To directly compare effectiveness, we used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate a set of assay strains with a common single-guide RNA (sgRNA) target sequence, but that differ in the juxtaposed PAM (NGG, NGA, or NGCG). In this controlled setting, we determined that the NGA PAM Cas9 variant can be as effective as wild-type Cas9. We similarly edited a genomic target to study the influence of the base following the NGA PAM. Using four strains with four NGAN PAMs differing only at the fourth position and adjacent to the same sgRNA target, we observed that efficient homologous replacement was attainable with any base in the fourth position, with an NGAG PAM being the most effective. In addition to demonstrating the utility of two Cas9 mutants in C. elegans and providing reagents that permit CRISPR/Cas9 experiments with fewer restrictions on potential targets, we established a means to benchmark the efficiency of different Cas9::PAM combinations that avoids variations owing to differences in the sgRNA sequence.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. elegans; CRISPR/Cas9; VQR Cas9; alternate PAMs; genome editing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680661      PMCID: PMC4788222          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  36 in total

1.  Landscape of target:guide homology effects on Cas9-mediated cleavage.

Authors:  Becky Xu Hua Fu; Loren L Hansen; Karen L Artiles; Michael L Nonet; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Xuebing Wu; Andrea J Kriz; Phillip A Sharp
Journal:  Quant Biol       Date:  2014-06

3.  Streamlined Genome Engineering with a Self-Excising Drug Selection Cassette.

Authors:  Daniel J Dickinson; Ariel M Pani; Jennifer K Heppert; Christopher D Higgins; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Joshua A Arribere; Ryan T Bell; Becky X H Fu; Karen L Artiles; Phil S Hartman; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  High Efficiency, Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Andrew Folkmann; Dominique Rasoloson; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; John Aach; P Benjamin Stranges; Kevin M Esvelt; Mark Moosburner; Sriram Kosuri; Luhan Yang; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Ari E Friedland; Yonatan B Tzur; Kevin M Esvelt; Monica P Colaiácovo; George M Church; John A Calarco
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Rapid and precise engineering of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome with lethal mutation co-conversion and inactivation of NHEJ repair.

Authors:  Jordan D Ward
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  SapTrap, a Toolkit for High-Throughput CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Modification in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Matthew L Schwartz; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  CRISPR-Cas9-Guided Genome Engineering in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Hyun-Min Kim; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12

3.  Efficient Generation of Endogenous Fluorescent Reporters by Nested CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jeremy Vicencio; Carmen Martínez-Fernández; Xènia Serrat; Julián Cerón
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The Caenorhabditis elegans Transgenic Toolbox.

Authors:  Jeremy Nance; Christian Frøkjær-Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Introduction to Gene Editing and Manipulation Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.

Authors:  Martin Newman; Frederick M Ausubel
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 6.  Targeted genome engineering in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Xiangyang Chen; Xuezhu Feng; Shouhong Guang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 7.133

7.  Programmable base editing of zebrafish genome using a modified CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Yihan Zhang; Wei Qin; Xiaochan Lu; Jason Xu; Haigen Huang; Haipeng Bai; Song Li; Shuo Lin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Cas9-assisted recombineering in C. elegans: genome editing using in vivo assembly of linear DNAs.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Helen Schmidt; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Expanding CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Capacity in Zebrafish Using SaCas9.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Cheng Chen; Yuxiang Han; Zelin Chen; Xiaochan Lu; Fang Liang; Song Li; Wei Qin; Shuo Lin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 10.  CRISPR-Based Methods for Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Daniel J Dickinson; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.