Literature DB >> 25440822

Comparative study of the treatment of renal stones with flexible ureterorenoscopy in normal weight, obese, and morbidly obese patients.

Steeve Doizi1, Julien Letendre2, Claire Bonneau3, Sixtina Gil Diez de Medina1, Olivier Traxer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and the safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) in the treatment of kidney stones according to the body mass index (BMI), which seems to be less influenced by weight compared with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study in patients with a known BMI who underwent an f-URS for kidney stones between 2006 and 2008. Success rates in the obese patients (OP) group (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) were compared with success rates in the normal weight patients (NWP) control group (BMI <25 kg/m(2)). Patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m(2) were defined as morbidly obese patients (MOP), a subgroup of the OP group. The success was defined as a stone-free status (no or ≤2 mm residual stone) at the time of control, 3 months after the procedure assessed by kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography coupled with ultrasound (only in NWP with radiopaque stones), or computed tomography-scan.
RESULTS: A total of 327 procedures were performed, including 97 f-URS in 87 OP (including 14 procedures in 13 MOP) and 230 procedures for 188 NWP. The overall success rate was 67.4% and 68% in the NWP and OP, respectively; P = .91 (71.4% in the MOP subgroup). Success rates decreased with an increasing stone size without any differences between the groups. Regardless of location and stone size (<10, 10-20, >20 mm), there was no statistical difference in the success rate. Postoperative morbidity was similar in both groups and occurred in 2.44% of cases.
CONCLUSION: f-URS for kidney stones resulted in similar outcomes in NWP and OP, and even MOP, regardless of stone size and location and with equivalent morbidity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440822     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  [Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of ureterorenoscopy for renal stones].

Authors:  F Schott; S Knipper; A K Orywal; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients.

Authors:  He-Qun Chen; Zhi-Yong Chen; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhong-Qing Yang; Cheng He; Yao He
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of two techniques for the management of 2-3 cm lower pole renal calculi in obese patients.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Ding Xia; Ejun Peng; Yonghua Tong; Hailang Liu; Xinguang Wang; Yu He; Zhiqiang Chen; Kun Tang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Xiaolin Huang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Superobese: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Michael S Borofsky; Nadya York; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of 10-20 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Fatih Elbir; Omer Sarilar; Zafer Gokhan Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Murat Binbay; Ali Ihsan Tasci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ureteroscopy Is Equally Efficient and Safe in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; XiaoShuai Gao; Liao Peng; Tao Jin
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 8.  Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Rijin Song; Pei Lu; Minjun Jiang; Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.