Literature DB >> 17440172

Prognostic impact of metabolic syndrome by different definitions in a population with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes: the Strong Heart Study.

Giovanni de Simone1, Richard B Devereux, Marcello Chinali, Lyle G Best, Elisa T Lee, James M Galloway, Helaine E Resnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed which definition of the metabolic syndrome is more predictive of cardiovascular events in both diabetic and nondiabetic members of a population-based sample. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 10-year, longitudinal follow-up of the Strong Heart Study cohort has been evaluated. The analysis included 3,945 participants (2,384 female) with complete data (1,700 with diabetes and 1,468 with arterial hypertension) for evaluation of metabolic syndrome. Those with prevalent cardiovascular disease were excluded (n = 287, of whom 127 were female). Prevalence of metabolic syndrome was assessed based on the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP) III, and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions. The main outcome was 10-year incidence of combined fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, including stroke, coronary heart disease, and congestive heart failure.
RESULTS: Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events occurred in 1,120 participants. After adjusting for age, sex, and diabetes, metabolic syndrome by all definitions was significantly associated with higher incidence of cardiovascular events (all P < 0.0001). In nondiabetic individuals, incident cardiovascular event rates were about 30-40% higher in those with metabolic syndrome, without a significant difference among definitions (0.03 < P < 0.001), and remained significant in WHO and NCEP ATP III definitions even after further adjustment for obesity, hypertension, and low HDL cholesterol. In the diabetic group, metabolic syndrome risk for cardiovascular events was greatest using the WHO definition (P < 0.002 vs. other models).
CONCLUSIONS: In individuals without diabetes, metabolic syndrome is associated with incident cardiovascular disease, especially with WHO and NCEP ATP III definitions. Metabolic syndrome also predicts higher cardiovascular event rates in diabetic participants, a prediction that is greatest using the WHO definition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440172     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  48 in total

1.  The controversy regarding contrast echocardiography and how it affects patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel L Wagner; Julio E Pérez; Linda R Peterson; Ravi Rasalingam
Journal:  J Cardiometab Syndr       Date:  2008

2.  Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Without Diabetes or Cardiovascular Disease: Usefulness of Metabolic Syndrome Severity Score.

Authors:  Walter Masson; Teo Epstein; Melina Huerín; Lorenzo Martín Lobo; Graciela Molinero; Adriana Angel; Gerardo Masson; Diana Millán; Salvador De Francesca; Laura Vitagliano; Alberto Cafferata; Pablo Losada
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-05-13

3.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Partial normalization of components of metabolic syndrome does not influence prevalent echocardiographic abnormalities: the HyperGEN study.

Authors:  G de Simone; D K Arnett; M Chinali; M De Marco; D C Rao; A T Kraja; S C Hunt; R B Devereux
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.222

Review 5.  Molecular determinants of the cardiometabolic phenotype.

Authors:  Lisa de las Fuentes; Giovanni de Simone; Donna K Arnett; Víctor G Dávila-Román
Journal:  Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Variations in prevalent cardiovascular disease and future risk by metabolic syndrome classification in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Todd M Brown; Jenifer H Voeks; Vera Bittner; Monika M Safford
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  The Association of Arsenic Exposure and Arsenic Metabolism With the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Individual Components: Prospective Evidence From the Strong Heart Family Study.

Authors:  Miranda J Spratlen; Maria Grau-Perez; Lyle G Best; Joseph Yracheta; Mariana Lazo; Dhananjay Vaidya; Poojitha Balakrishnan; Mary V Gamble; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Shelley A Cole; Jason G Umans; Barbara V Howard; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Metabolic syndrome and left ventricular hypertrophy in the prediction of cardiovascular events: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  G de Simone; R B Devereux; M Chinali; M J Roman; E T Lee; H E Resnick; B V Howard
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.222

9.  The relation of metabolic syndrome according to five definitions to cardiovascular risk factors--a population-based study.

Authors:  Cheng-Chieh Lin; Chiu-Shong Liu; Chia-Ing Li; Wen-Yuan Lin; Ming-May Lai; Tsann Lin; Pei-Chia Chang; Yih-Dar Lee; Ching-Chu Chen; Chih-Hsueh Lin; Chuan-Wei Yang; Chih-Yi Hsiao; Walter Chen; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A novel nonparametric approach for estimating cut-offs in continuous risk indicators with application to diabetes epidemiology.

Authors:  Jens Klotsche; Dietmar Ferger; Lars Pieper; Jürgen Rehm; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.