Literature DB >> 28451825

Using PET for therapy monitoring in oncological clinical trials: challenges ahead.

C M Deroose1,2,3, S Stroobants4,5, Y Liu4,6, L K Shankar7, P Bourguet4,8.   

Abstract

Molecular imaging with PET has emerged as a powerful imaging tool in the clinical care of oncological patients. Assessing therapy response is a prime application of PET and so the integration of PET into multicentre trials can offer valuable scientific insights and shape future clinical practice. However, there are a number of logistic and methodological challenges that have to be dealt with. These range from availability and regulatory compliance of the PET radiopharmaceutical to availability of scan time for research purposes. Standardization of imaging and reconstruction protocols, quality control, image processing and analysis are of paramount importance. Strategies for harmonization of the final image and the quantification result are available and can be implemented within the scope of multicentre accreditation programmes. Data analysis can be performed either locally or by centralized review. Response assessment can be done visually or using more quantitative approaches, depending on the research question. Large-scale real-time centralized review can be achieved using web-based solutions. Specific challenges for the future are inclusion of PET/MRI scanners in multicentre trials and the incorporation of radiomic analyses. Inclusion of PET in multicentre trials is a necessity to guarantee the further development of PET for routine clinical care and may yield very valuable scientific insights.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Multicentre; Oncology; PET; Protocol; Quality assurance; Quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451825     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3689-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  24 in total

Review 1.  A risk management approach for imaging biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Nandita M deSouza; Lalitha K Shankar; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Siegfried Trattnig; Sandra Collette; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Effect of Attenuation Correction on Regional Quantification Between PET/MR and PET/CT: A Multicenter Study Using a 3-Dimensional Brain Phantom.

Authors:  Jarmo Teuho; Jarkko Johansson; Jani Linden; Adam Espe Hansen; Søren Holm; Sune H Keller; Gaspar Delso; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Keiichi Magota; Virva Saunavaara; Tuula Tolvanen; Mika Teräs; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance.

Authors:  Nikolaos E Makris; Ronald Boellaard; Eric P Visser; Johan R de Jong; Bruno Vanderlinden; Roel Wierts; Berlinda J van der Veen; Henri J N M Greuter; Danielle J Vugts; Guus A M S van Dongen; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael M Graham; Richard L Wahl; John M Hoffman; Jeffrey T Yap; John J Sunderland; Ronald Boellaard; Eric S Perlman; Paul E Kinahan; Paul E Christian; Otto S Hoekstra; Gary S Dorfman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  18F-FDG PET/CT heterogeneity quantification through textural features in the era of harmonisation programs: a focus on lung cancer.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Mohamed Majdoub; Brice Lavigne; Pascal Do; Jeannick Madelaine; Dimitris Visvikis; Mathieu Hatt; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  EANM guideline for the preparation of an Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD).

Authors:  Sergio Todde; Albert D Windhorst; Martin Behe; Guy Bormans; Clemens Decristoforo; Alain Faivre-Chauvet; Valentina Ferrari; Antony D Gee; Balazs Gulyas; Christer Halldin; Petra Kolenc Peitl; Jacek Koziorowski; Thomas L Mindt; Martina Sollini; Johnny Vercouillie; James R Ballinger; Philip H Elsinga
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Corinne Haioun
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-08

Review 9.  Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bing Bai; James Bading; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Jacobo Cal-González; David Dapra; Hans Jürgen Gallowitsch; Peter Lind; Thomas Beyer; Gregory Minear
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2015-10-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Karen Ehlers; Edith Motschall; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Therapy monitoring with PET in cancer patients: achievements, opportunities and challenges ahead for the PET community.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.