| Literature DB >> 26675493 |
Gay Carter1, Branko Miladinovic2, Achintya A Patel2, Lauren Deland1, Stephen Mastorides1, Niketa A Patel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM), a metabolic disease, is characterized by impaired fasting glucose levels. Type 2 DM is adult onset diabetes. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate gene expression and multiple studies have linked lncRNAs to human diseases.Entities:
Keywords: AUC, area under curve; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; Diabetes; GAS5; GAS5, growth-arrest specific transcript 5; NMD, nonsense mediated decay; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; Serum; Veterans; lncRNA; lncRNA, long noncoding RNA
Year: 2015 PMID: 26675493 PMCID: PMC4661729 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BBA Clin ISSN: 2214-6474
Characteristics of patients in this study.
| Non diabetic (n = 49) | Diabetic (n = 47) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | 29.4 ± 6.6 | 34.8 ± 7.0 | < 0.001 |
| Age | 66.9 ± 9.7 | 70.3 ± 9.1 | 0.09 |
| Blood glucose | 102.8 ± 16.3 | 163.6 ± 61.3 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 1LncRNA profiler array was used to determine expression of lncRNAs in serum from diabetic (n = 5) and non-diabetic (n = 5) samples. RNA was extracted from serum samples, reverse transcribed and cDNA used in lncRNA Profiler (SBI). Average Ct was calculated for diabetic and non-diabetic samples, values normalized to hoU6 snRNA. Log graph shows fold change calculated as 2^ − (Ct(avDM) − Ct(avNDM) × ΔCt(geo mean)). Analysis was performed by software from SBI.
Fig. 2(a) Serum from non-diabetic (n = 49) and diabetic (n = 47) were analyzed for expression of GAS5 using qPCR. A standard curve was generated using 100–0.4 ng/μl GAS5 plasmid. Samples were normalized to U6snRNA. Graph shows absolute quantification of GAS5 (ng/μl) vs HbA1c. (b) Plot of mean (95% confidence interval) GAS5 and HbA1c levels by diabetic status. The confidence limits are mean ± 2 ∗ standard error.
Fig. 3Receiver operating curve (ROC) was performed on GAS5 levels in serum from diabetic patients (n = 47) and non-diabetic patients (n = 49) to determine the optimal cutoff values. Area under curve (AUC) for GAS5 is 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90); Sensitivity of 85.1% (95% CI: 72.3%, 92.6%), specificity of 67.3% (95% CI: 53.4%, 78.8%), positive predictive value PPV = 71.4% (95% CI:57.8%, 82.7%).
Fig. 4The waterfall plot shows the classification accuracy of the optimal cutoff point for all 96 patients (diabetic (n = 47) + non-diabetic (n = 49) = 96), as well as the overall odds ratio for GAS5 as a predictor of diabetes (OR = 0.75 (95%CI: 0.64, 0.87), p < 0.001).