Literature DB >> 23316427

Effects of a movement training program on hip and knee joint frontal plane running mechanics.

Isaac Wouters1, Thomas Almonroeder, Bryan Dejarlais, Andrew Laack, John D Willson, Thomas W Kernozek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Frontal plane running mechanics may contribute to the etiology or exacerbation of common running related injuries. Hip strengthening alone may not change frontal plane hip and knee joint running mechanics. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether a training program including visual, verbal, and tactile feedback affects hip and knee joint frontal plane running mechanics among females with evidence of altered weight bearing kinematics.
METHODS: The knee frontal plane projection angle of 69 apparently healthy females was determined during a single leg squat. The twenty females from this larger sample who exhibited the most acute frontal plane projection angle (medial knee position) during this activity were chosen to participate in this study (age = 20 ± 1.6 years, height = 167.9 ± 6.0 cm, mass = 63.2 ± 8.3 kg, Tegner Activity Rating mode = 7.0). Participants engaged in a 4-week movement training program using guided practice during weight bearing exercises with visual, verbal, and tactile feedback regarding lower extremity alignment. Paired t-tests were used to compare frontal plane knee and hip joint angles and moments before and after the training program.
RESULTS: After training, internal hip and knee abduction moments during running decreased by 23% (P=0.007) and 29% (P=0.033) respectively. Knee adduction and abduction excursion decreased by 2.1° (P = 0.050) and 2.7° (P=0.008) respectively, suggesting that less frontal plane movement of the knee occurred during running after training. Peak knee abduction angle decreased 1.8° after training (P=0.051) although this was not statistically significant. Contralateral peak pelvic drop, pelvic drop excursion, peak hip adduction angle, hip adduction excursion, and peak knee adduction angle were unchanged following training.
CONCLUSIONS: A four week movement training program may reduce frontal plane hip and knee joint mechanics thought to contribute to the etiology and exacerbation of some running related injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  female; kinematics; kinetics; neuromuscular training; rehabilitation

Year:  2012        PMID: 23316427      PMCID: PMC3537459     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  27 in total

1.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; M Wada; H Kawahara; M Sato; H Baba; S Shimada
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Reducing the lateral force acting on the patella does not consistently decrease patellofemoral pressures.

Authors:  John J Elias; Jennifer A Cech; David M Weinstein; Andrew J Cosgrea
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-05-18       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Effect of a neuromuscular training program on the kinetics and kinematics of jumping tasks.

Authors:  Jonathan D Chappell; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Muscle strength in the lower extremity does not predict postinstruction improvements in the landing patterns of female athletes.

Authors:  Ryan L Mizner; Jeffrey K Kawaguchi; Terese L Chmielewski
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running.

Authors:  C Reinschmidt; A J van den Bogert; B M Nigg; A Lundberg; N Murphy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact.

Authors:  H H Huberti; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Proximal and distal influences on hip and knee kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain during a prolonged run.

Authors:  Tracy A Dierks; Kurt T Manal; Joseph Hamill; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Lower extremity jumping mechanics of female athletes with and without patellofemoral pain before and after exertion.

Authors:  John D Willson; Stuart Binder-Macleod; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006 prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome.

Authors:  Brian Noehren; Irene Davis; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Biomechanical predictors of retrospective tibial stress fractures in runners.

Authors:  Michael B Pohl; David R Mullineaux; Clare E Milner; Joseph Hamill; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  9 in total

1.  CHANGES IN PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT STRESS DURING RUNNING WITH THE APPLICATION OF A PREFABRICATED FOOT ORTHOTIC.

Authors:  Thomas G Almonroeder; Lauren C Benson; Kristian M O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

2.  INFLUENCE OF INJURY ON DYNAMIC POSTURAL CONTROL IN RUNNERS.

Authors:  Stacey Meardon; Anna Klusendorf; Thomas Kernozek
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

3.  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN BIOMECHANICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Richard W Willy; Erik P Meira
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

4.  Effects of Posterior X Taping on Movement Quality and Knee Pain Intensity during Forward-Step-Down in Patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Authors:  Eui-Hwan Lim; Mo-Eun Kim; Si-Hyun Kim; Kyue-Nam Park
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  A Randomized Study of a Strength Training Program to Prevent Injuries in Runners of the New York City Marathon.

Authors:  Brett G Toresdahl; Kathryn McElheny; Jordan Metzl; Brittany Ammerman; Brenda Chang; James Kinderknecht
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  QUANTIFYING FRONTAL PLANE KNEE KINEMATICS IN SUBJECTS WITH ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN: THE RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF 2D MOTION ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Michelle Ramirez; Rodney Negrete; William J Hanney; Morey J Kolber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-02

7.  Effects of running fatigue on lower extremity symmetry among amateur runners: From a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Zixiang Gao; Gusztáv Fekete; Julien S Baker; Minjun Liang; Rongrong Xuan; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  An evidence-based review of hip-focused neuromuscular exercise interventions to address dynamic lower extremity valgus.

Authors:  Kevin R Ford; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Steven L Dischiavi; Eric J Hegedus; Emma F Zuk; Jeffrey B Taylor
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  Lower extremity kinematic analysis in male athletes with unilateral anterior cruciate reconstruction in a jump-landing task and its association with return to sport criteria.

Authors:  Sadegh Norouzi; Fateme Esfandiarpour; Sina Mehdizadeh; Nasim Kiani Yousefzadeh; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.