Literature DB >> 32320284

Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Drop-Vertical Jump and Muscle Strength in Women With Patellofemoral Pain.

Andrea Baellow1, Neal R Glaviano2, Jay Hertel1, Susan A Saliba1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the most prevalent knee conditions observed in women. Current research suggests that individuals with PFP have altered muscle activity, kinematics, and kinetics during functional tasks. However, few authors have examined differences in lower extremity biomechanics in this population during the drop-vertical jump (DVJ).
OBJECTIVE: To determine how lower extremity electromyography, kinematics, and kinetics during a DVJ and lower extremity isometric strength differed between women with and those without PFP.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen healthy women (age = 20.23 ± 1.39 years, height = 169.32 ± 5.38 cm, mass = 67.73 ± 9.57 kg) and 15 women with PFP (age = 22.33 ± 3.49 years, height = 166.42 ± 6.01 cm, mass = 65.67 ± 13.75 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Three trials of a DVJ. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surface electromyography, kinematics, and kinetics were collected simultaneously during a DVJ. Lower extremity strength was measured isometrically. Independent-samples t tests were performed to assess group differences.
RESULTS: Normalized muscle activity in the vastus medialis (healthy group = 120.84 ± 80.73, PFP group = 235.84 ± 152.29), gluteus maximus (healthy group = 43.81 ± 65.63, PFP group = 13.37 ± 13.55), and biceps femoris (healthy group = 36.68 ± 62.71, PFP group = 11.04 ± 8.9) during the landing phase of the DVJ differed between groups. Compared with healthy women, those with PFP completed the DVJ with greater hip internal-rotation moment (0.04 ± 0.28 N/kg versus 0.06 ± 0.14 N/kg, respectively) and had decreased knee-flexion excursion (76.76° ± 7.50° versus PFP = 74.14° ± 19.85°, respectively); they took less time to reach peak trunk flexion (0.19 ± 0.01 seconds versus 0.19 ± 0.02 seconds, respectively) and lateral trunk flexion (0.12 ± 0.07 seconds versus 0.11 ± 0.04 seconds, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: During the DVJ, women with PFP had increased hip internal-rotation moment and decreased knee-flexion excursion with less time to peak trunk flexion and lateral flexion. Muscle activation was increased in the vastus medialis but decreased in the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris. This suggests that altered motor-unit recruitment in the hip and thigh may result in changes in biomechanics during a DVJ that are often associated with an increased risk of injury. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip kinematics; hip kinetics; knee kinematics; knee kinetics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320284      PMCID: PMC7319735          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-476-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  32 in total

1.  High knee abduction moments are common risk factors for patellofemoral pain (PFP) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in girls: is PFP itself a predictor for subsequent ACL injury?

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Stephanie L Di Stasi; Kim D Barber Foss; Lyle J Micheli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Robert S Heidt; Angelo J Colosimo; Scott G McLean; Antonie J van den Bogert; Mark V Paterno; Paul Succop
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Relationship between hip strength and trunk, hip, and knee kinematics during a jump-landing task in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Michelle Boling; Darin Padua
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10

4.  Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise.

Authors:  Shawn Farrokhi; Christine D Pollard; Richard B Souza; Yu-Jen Chen; Stephen Reischl; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact.

Authors:  H H Huberti; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Preferred Hip Strategy During Landing Reduces Knee Abduction Moment in Collegiate Female Soccer Players.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Jeffrey B Taylor; Taylor G Wimbish; Jennifer L Keith; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  DEMOGRAPHIC AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL TRENDS IN PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Michelle Kew; Joseph M Hart; Susan Saliba
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

8.  Impairment-Based Rehabilitation With Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation and Lower Extremity Function in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Neal R Glaviano; Ashley N Marshall; L Colby Mangum; Joseph M Hart; Jay Hertel; Shawn Russell; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Lower extremity mechanics of females with and without patellofemoral pain across activities with progressively greater task demands.

Authors:  John D Willson; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?

Authors:  Kay M Crossley; Kim L Bennell; Sallie M Cowan; Sally Green
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.