| Literature DB >> 26673853 |
Alex Kiselyov1, Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky2, Vladimir Startsev3.
Abstract
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine is the preferred first line treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) in order to prevent recurrence and progression of cancer. There is ongoing need for the rational selection of i) BCG dose, ii) frequency of BCG administration along with iii) synergistic adjuvant therapy and iv) a reliable set of biochemical markers relevant to tumor response. In this review we evaluate cellular and molecular markers pertinent to the immunological response triggered by the BCG instillation and respective mathematical models of the treatment. Specific examples of markers include diverse immune cells, genetic polymorphisms, miRNAs, epigenetics, immunohistochemistry and molecular biology 'beacons' as exemplified by cell surface proteins, cytokines, signaling proteins and enzymes. We identified tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, a combination of Ki-67/CK20, IL-2, IL-8 and IL-6/IL-10 ratio as the most promising markers for both pre-BCG and post-BCG treatment suitable for the simulation studies. The intricate and patient-specific nature of these data warrants the use of powerful multi-parametral mathematical methods in combination with molecular/cellular biology insight and clinical input.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus Calmette–Guerin; Biological marker; Bladder cancer; Mathematical models
Year: 2015 PMID: 26673853 PMCID: PMC4661599 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BBA Clin ISSN: 2214-6474
Fig. 2A) Schedule of maintenance treatment plan (Lamm's protocol): six-weekly intravesical instillations of BCG (standard dose) and low dose of BCG (1/3 or 1/10 of the standard dose) for the 3 maintenance instillations until 52 weeks; B) simulation effects of a treatment regimen (BCG only) with maintenance of BCG instillations (1/3 of standard dose) for 50 people. Shown is the tumor cells count as a function of time (500 days during and after therapy); C) simulated effect of BCG + IL-2 (induction) and BCG + IL-2 (maintenance) on 50 virtual patients. Time evolution of tumor cells up to 500 days. Maintenance treatment was carried out with 1/10th of the standard BCG dose.
Red solid line — NR (non-responders to the treatment), blue solid line — CR (complete response), black solid line — PR (partial response), and green slashed line — SD (stable disease).
Fig. 3A summary of pre- and post-BCG biological markers described in the text. The most promising predictive markers and/or their combination for BCG response are in bold.
Fig. 1Tentative molecular cascade of immune response induced by intravesical BCG instillation. BCG is believed to cause tumor elimination by attachment of the BCG to specific receptors on the urothelium (ex., fibronectin, integrins) and initiation of inflammation reaction. This step leads to the release of multiple cytokines and chemokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, etc.) from both tumor and normal cells to attract a variety of immune cells into the bladder wall (dendritic cells (DCs), neutrophils, macrophages; key effectors in the BCG response are marked with blue boxes). Internalization of BCG triggers phagocytosis, apoptotic death via the release of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), maturation and differentiation of naïve CD4 + T cells into TH1 and/or TH2 cells that direct immune responses toward cellular or humoral immunity, respectively. The therapeutic effect of BCG depends on the proper induction of TH1 immune responses. IL-10 inhibits TH1 immune responses whereas IFN-γ inhibits TH2 immune responses. Blocking IL-10 or inducing IFN-γ can lead to a TH1 dominated immunity that is essential for BCG-mediated bladder cancer destruction. Detection and quantification of these cells as well as additional biological markers pre-BCG treatment (ex., single nucleotide polymorphism, miRNAs, epigenetics, proteins) or after BCG installments in the clinical analytes is expected to provide better insight into cancer dynamics, its aggressiveness and optimize individual treatment options.