BACKGROUND: T-wave alternans (TWA) is usually performed at accelerated heart rates (HR) during exercise, while recovery TWA is typically not analyzed. Consequently, it is still unknown if TWA shows a HR-dependent hysteresis or not. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate TWA dependency on HR during both the exercise and recovery phases of an ergometer test, and to evaluate if recovery TWA may contribute to identify subjects at increased risk of arrhythmic events. METHODS: Our HR adaptive match filter was used to identify TWA from electrocardiographic recordings acquired during a bicycle ergometer test in 266 patients with implanted cardio-defibrillator. During the 4-year follow-up, 76 patients developed tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (ICD_Cases) and 190 did not (ICD_Controls). RESULTS: TWA was statistically lower during exercise than recovery for HRs between 75 and 110 bpm (16-21 μV vs 20-27 μV; P < 0.05), and reverse for HRs between 120 and 130 bpm (41-51 μV vs 28 μV; P < 0.05). ICD_Cases and ICD_Controls showed significantly different TWA at 80 bpm (20 μV vs 15 μV; P < 0.05) and 140 bpm (15 μV vs 22 μV; P < 0.05) during exercise, and at 90 bpm (38 μV vs 21 μV; P < 0.05) and 95 bpm (33-24 μV vs 28 μV; P < 0.05) during recovery. CONCLUSIONS: TWA shows a HR-dependent hysteresis and there is a different behavior of TWA in ICD_Cases and ICD_Controls groups. Consequently, beside exercise TWA also recovery TWA may contribute to identify subjects at increased risk of arrhythmic events.
BACKGROUND: T-wave alternans (TWA) is usually performed at accelerated heart rates (HR) during exercise, while recovery TWA is typically not analyzed. Consequently, it is still unknown if TWA shows a HR-dependent hysteresis or not. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate TWA dependency on HR during both the exercise and recovery phases of an ergometer test, and to evaluate if recovery TWA may contribute to identify subjects at increased risk of arrhythmic events. METHODS: Our HR adaptive match filter was used to identify TWA from electrocardiographic recordings acquired during a bicycle ergometer test in 266 patients with implanted cardio-defibrillator. During the 4-year follow-up, 76 patients developed tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (ICD_Cases) and 190 did not (ICD_Controls). RESULTS: TWA was statistically lower during exercise than recovery for HRs between 75 and 110 bpm (16-21 μV vs 20-27 μV; P < 0.05), and reverse for HRs between 120 and 130 bpm (41-51 μV vs 28 μV; P < 0.05). ICD_Cases and ICD_Controls showed significantly different TWA at 80 bpm (20 μV vs 15 μV; P < 0.05) and 140 bpm (15 μV vs 22 μV; P < 0.05) during exercise, and at 90 bpm (38 μV vs 21 μV; P < 0.05) and 95 bpm (33-24 μV vs 28 μV; P < 0.05) during recovery. CONCLUSIONS: TWA shows a HR-dependent hysteresis and there is a different behavior of TWA in ICD_Cases and ICD_Controls groups. Consequently, beside exercise TWA also recovery TWA may contribute to identify subjects at increased risk of arrhythmic events.
Authors: Mikko Minkkinen; Tuomo Nieminen; Richard L Verrier; Johanna Leino; Terho Lehtimäki; Jari Viik; Rami Lehtinen; Kjell Nikus; Tiit Kööbi; Väinö Turjanmaa; Mika Kähönen Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Faisal M Merchant; Takanori Ikeda; Roberto F E Pedretti; Jorge A Salerno-Uriarte; Theodore Chow; Paul S Chan; Cheryl Bartone; Stefan H Hohnloser; Richard J Cohen; Antonis A Armoundas Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Karin Kraaier; Patrick M J Verhorst; Job van der Palen; Pascal F H M van Dessel; Arthur A M Wilde; Marcoen F Scholten Journal: Europace Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Sumche Man; Priscilla V De Winter; Arie C Maan; Joep Thijssen; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Wilbert P M van Meerwijk; Marianne Bootsma; Lieselot van Erven; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Laura Burattini; Roberto Burattini; Cees A Swenne Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Eric J Rashba; Ahmed F Osman; Karen MacMurdy; Malcolm M Kirk; Samantha Sarang; Robert W Peters; Stephen R Shorofsky; Michael R Gold Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2002-09
Authors: Mikko Minkkinen; Mika Kähönen; Jari Viik; Kjell Nikus; Terho Lehtimäki; Rami Lehtinen; Tiit Kööbi; Väinö Turjanmaa; Willi Kaiser; Richard L Verrier; Tuomo Nieminen Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2008-10-11
Authors: Johanna Leino; Mikko Minkkinen; Tuomo Nieminen; Terho Lehtimäki; Jari Viik; Rami Lehtinen; Kjell Nikus; Tiit Kööbi; Väinö Turjanmaa; Richard L Verrier; Mika Kähönen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Laura Burattini; Sumche Man; Sandro Fioretti; Francesco Di Nardo; Cees A Swenne Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Laura Burattini; Sumche Man; Sandro Fioretti; Francesco Di Nardo; Cees A Swenne Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 1.468