D S Taljaard1,2, M Olaithe3, C G Brennan-Jones1,2, R H Eikelboom1,2,4, R S Bucks3. 1. Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, WA, Australia. 2. Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia. 3. School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia. 4. Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss affects over 1.23 billion people globally. It has been proposed that hearing impairment negatively impacts on cognition. Some studies have demonstrated a faster rate of decline in cognition, and increased risk of incident all-cause dementia. This finding is not ubiquitous. This study used meta-analysis to examine the evidence-base regarding the relationship between hearing and cognition. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analyses of study findings were conducted. Published and grey literature was reviewed. Papers were included if they studied the relationship between hearing and cognition in adults with and without hearing impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Meta-analyses examined evidence for and against seven questions. Is cognition poorer in individuals with normal hearing compared to (i) untreated or (ii) treated hearing impairment, is cognition associated with degree of hearing impairment in (iii) untreated and/or (iv) treated hearing, is cognition (v) different in untreated compared to treated hearing impairment, (vii) does cognition improve after intervention, and (vii) how is hearing impairment differentially associated with cognitive ability across six domains of cognition? RESULTS: The 33 included studies contributed 40 samples, with a total of 602 participants with untreated hearing impairment, 672 participants with treated hearing impairment, 176 healthy controls, and 4260 individuals with a range of hearing impairment with/without treatment. The results demonstrated that cognition is significantly poorer in (i) individuals with untreated hearing and remains poorer in (ii) treated hearing impairment compared to normal hearers. The degree of cognitive deficit is significantly associated with the degree of hearing impairment in both (iii) untreated and (iv) treated hearing impairment. Furthermore, (v) hearing intervention significantly improves cognition. Finally, (vii) hearing impairment impacted on all domains of cognition. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that hearing impairment is associated with cognitive problems. However, due to diversity within studies, small sample sizes, the failure to control for premorbid and other health factors, this conclusion may be premature.
OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss affects over 1.23 billion people globally. It has been proposed that hearing impairment negatively impacts on cognition. Some studies have demonstrated a faster rate of decline in cognition, and increased risk of incident all-cause dementia. This finding is not ubiquitous. This study used meta-analysis to examine the evidence-base regarding the relationship between hearing and cognition. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analyses of study findings were conducted. Published and grey literature was reviewed. Papers were included if they studied the relationship between hearing and cognition in adults with and without hearing impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Meta-analyses examined evidence for and against seven questions. Is cognition poorer in individuals with normal hearing compared to (i) untreated or (ii) treated hearing impairment, is cognition associated with degree of hearing impairment in (iii) untreated and/or (iv) treated hearing, is cognition (v) different in untreated compared to treated hearing impairment, (vii) does cognition improve after intervention, and (vii) how is hearing impairment differentially associated with cognitive ability across six domains of cognition? RESULTS: The 33 included studies contributed 40 samples, with a total of 602 participants with untreated hearing impairment, 672 participants with treated hearing impairment, 176 healthy controls, and 4260 individuals with a range of hearing impairment with/without treatment. The results demonstrated that cognition is significantly poorer in (i) individuals with untreated hearing and remains poorer in (ii) treated hearing impairment compared to normal hearers. The degree of cognitive deficit is significantly associated with the degree of hearing impairment in both (iii) untreated and (iv) treated hearing impairment. Furthermore, (v) hearing intervention significantly improves cognition. Finally, (vii) hearing impairment impacted on all domains of cognition. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that hearing impairment is associated with cognitive problems. However, due to diversity within studies, small sample sizes, the failure to control for premorbid and other health factors, this conclusion may be premature.
Authors: Stephanie C Rigters; Marc P van der Schroeff; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; André Goedegebure Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: Bret R Rutherford; Katharine Brewster; Justin S Golub; Ana H Kim; Steven P Roose Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: David G Loughrey; Michelle E Kelly; George A Kelley; Sabina Brennan; Brian A Lawlor Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Maria Vassilaki; Jeremiah A Aakre; David S Knopman; Walter K Kremers; Michelle M Mielke; Yonas E Geda; Mary M Machulda; Razan Al Fakir; Chaitanya Undavalli; Rosebud O Roberts; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Katharine K Brewster; Martina Pavlicova; Alexandra Stein; Mei Chen; Chen Chen; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Ana H Kim; Justin S Golub; Adam Brickman; Jessica Galatioto; Megan Kuhlmey; Bret R Rutherford Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Justin S Golub; Rahul K Sharma; Brady Q Rippon; Adam M Brickman; José A Luchsinger Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 3.325