OBJECTIVES: Growing evidence suggests that vestibular function impacts higher-order cognitive ability such as visuospatial processing and executive functioning. Despite evidence demonstrating vestibular functional impairment impacting cognitive performance, it is unknown whether cognitive ability is differentially affected according to the type of vestibular impairment (semicircular canal [SCC] versus saccule) among patients with diagnosed vestibular disease. DESIGN: Fifty-four patients who presented to an academic neurotologic clinic were recruited into the study. All patients received a specific vestibular diagnosis. Forty-one patients had saccule function measured with the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, and 43 had SCC function measured using caloric irrigation. Cognitive tests were administered to assess cognitive performance among patients. One hundred twenty-five matched controls were recruited from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging to compare cognitive performance in patients relative to age-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Using multivariate linear regression analyses, patients with bilaterally absent cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e., bilateral saccular impairments) were found to take longer in completing the Trail-Making test (β = 25.7 sec, 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 51.6) and to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 4.5 errors, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 7.8). Patients with bilateral SCC impairment were found to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 9.8 errors, 95% CI = 0.2 to 19.4). From case-control analysis, for each SD difference in Trail-Making test part-B time, there was a corresponding 142% increase in odds of having vestibular impairment (odds ratio = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.44 to 4.07). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that bilateral saccule and SCC vestibular impairments may significantly affect various domains of cognitive performance. Notably, the cognitive performance in patients in this study was significantly poorer relative to age-matched healthy adults. Cognitive assessment may be considered in patients with saccule and SCC impairments, and cognitive deficits in vestibular patients may represent an important target for intervention.
OBJECTIVES: Growing evidence suggests that vestibular function impacts higher-order cognitive ability such as visuospatial processing and executive functioning. Despite evidence demonstrating vestibular functional impairment impacting cognitive performance, it is unknown whether cognitive ability is differentially affected according to the type of vestibular impairment (semicircular canal [SCC] versus saccule) among patients with diagnosed vestibular disease. DESIGN: Fifty-four patients who presented to an academic neurotologic clinic were recruited into the study. All patients received a specific vestibular diagnosis. Forty-one patients had saccule function measured with the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, and 43 had SCC function measured using caloric irrigation. Cognitive tests were administered to assess cognitive performance among patients. One hundred twenty-five matched controls were recruited from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging to compare cognitive performance in patients relative to age-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Using multivariate linear regression analyses, patients with bilaterally absent cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e., bilateral saccular impairments) were found to take longer in completing the Trail-Making test (β = 25.7 sec, 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 51.6) and to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 4.5 errors, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 7.8). Patients with bilateral SCC impairment were found to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 9.8 errors, 95% CI = 0.2 to 19.4). From case-control analysis, for each SD difference in Trail-Making test part-B time, there was a corresponding 142% increase in odds of having vestibular impairment (odds ratio = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.44 to 4.07). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that bilateral saccule and SCC vestibular impairments may significantly affect various domains of cognitive performance. Notably, the cognitive performance in patients in this study was significantly poorer relative to age-matched healthy adults. Cognitive assessment may be considered in patients with saccule and SCC impairments, and cognitive deficits in vestibular patients may represent an important target for intervention.
Authors: Robin T Bigelow; Yevgeniy R Semenov; Carolina Trevino; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Eleanor M Simonsick; Qian-Li Xue; Yuri Agrawal Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Thomas Brandt; Franz Schautzer; Derek A Hamilton; Roland Brüning; Hans J Markowitsch; Roger Kalla; Cynthia Darlington; Paul Smith; Michael Strupp Journal: Brain Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Klaus Jahn; Judith Wagner; Angela Deutschländer; Roger Kalla; Katharina Hüfner; Thomas Stephan; Michael Strupp; Thomas Brandt Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Martin Göttlich; Nico M Jandl; Jann F Wojak; Andreas Sprenger; Janina von der Gablentz; Thomas F Münte; Ulrike M Krämer; Christoph Helmchen Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.881