Literature DB >> 26669975

Gene signature combinations improve prognostic stratification of multiple myeloma patients.

W J Chng1, T-H Chung2, S Kumar3, S Usmani4, N Munshi5, H Avet-Loiseau6, H Goldschmidt7, B Durie8, P Sonneveld9.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm with significant molecular heterogeneity. Gene expression profiling (GEP) has contributed significantly to our understanding of the underlying biology and has led to several prognostic gene signatures. However, the best way to apply these GEP signatures in clinical practice is unclear. In this study, we investigated the integration of proven prognostic signatures for improved patient risk stratification. Three publicly available MM GEP data sets that encompass newly diagnosed as well as relapsed patients were analyzed using standardized estimation of nine prognostic MM signature indices and simulations of signature index combinations. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the performance of simulated combination indices. Taking the average of multiple GEP signature indices was a simple but highly effective way of integrating multiple GEP signatures. Furthermore, although adding more signatures in general improved performance substantially, we identified a core signature combination, EMC92+HZDCD, as the top-performing prognostic signature combination across all data sets. In this study, we provided a rationale for gene signature integration and a practical strategy to choose an optimal risk score estimation in the presence of multiple prognostic signatures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26669975     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  29 in total

1.  A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Kuiper; A Broyl; Y de Knegt; M H van Vliet; E H van Beers; B van der Holt; L el Jarari; G Mulligan; W Gregory; G Morgan; H Goldschmidt; H M Lokhorst; M van Duin; P Sonneveld
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A high-risk signature for patients with multiple myeloma established from the molecular classification of human myeloma cell lines.

Authors:  Jérôme Moreaux; Bernard Klein; Régis Bataille; Géraldine Descamps; Sophie Maïga; Dirk Hose; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anna Jauch; Thierry Rème; Michel Jourdan; Martine Amiot; Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Gene expression profiling and correlation with outcome in clinical trials of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.

Authors:  George Mulligan; Constantine Mitsiades; Barb Bryant; Fenghuang Zhan; Wee J Chng; Steven Roels; Erik Koenig; Andrew Fergus; Yongsheng Huang; Paul Richardson; William L Trepicchio; Annemiek Broyl; Pieter Sonneveld; John D Shaughnessy; P Leif Bergsagel; David Schenkein; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Anthony Boral; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Proliferation is a central independent prognostic factor and target for personalized and risk-adapted treatment in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Dirk Hose; Thierry Rème; Thomas Hielscher; Jérôme Moreaux; Tobias Messner; Anja Seckinger; Axel Benner; John D Shaughnessy; Bart Barlogie; Yiming Zhou; Jens Hillengass; Uta Bertsch; Kai Neben; Thomas Möhler; Jean François Rossi; Anna Jauch; Bernard Klein; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Breast cancer biomarker discovery in the functional genomic age: a systematic review of 42 gene expression signatures.

Authors:  M C Abba; E Lacunza; M Butti; C M Aldaz
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-10-27

8.  Prediction of survival in multiple myeloma based on gene expression profiles reveals cell cycle and chromosomal instability signatures in high-risk patients and hyperdiploid signatures in low-risk patients: a study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Olivier Decaux; Laurence Lodé; Florence Magrangeas; Catherine Charbonnel; Wilfried Gouraud; Pascal Jézéquel; Michel Attal; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Philippe Moreau; Régis Bataille; Loïc Campion; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stéphane Minvielle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Semi-supervised methods to predict patient survival from gene expression data.

Authors:  Eric Bair; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  A novel measure of chromosome instability can account for prognostic difference in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Chung; George Mulligan; Rafael Fonseca; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Gene Expression Profiles in Myeloma: Ready for the Real World?

Authors:  Raphael Szalat; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Eric Seifter
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 3.  Toward personalized treatment in multiple myeloma based on molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Faith E Davies
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Roundtable: How I treat a newly diagnosed patient with high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Jonathan L Kaufman
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  Using MMRFBiolinks R-Package for Discovering Prognostic Markers in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Marzia Settino; Mario Cannataro
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  High-risk disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: beyond the R-ISS and IMWG definitions.

Authors:  Patrick Hagen; Jiwang Zhang; Kevin Barton
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 9.812

7.  Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Saad Usmani; David Siegel; Kenneth C Anderson; Wee-Joo Chng; Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Robert A Kyle; Jo Caers; Jens Hillengass; Jesús San Miguel; Niels W C J van de Donk; Hermann Einsele; Joan Bladé; Brian G M Durie; Hartmut Goldschmidt; María-Victoria Mateos; Antonio Palumbo; Robert Orlowski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Epstein-Barr virus-associated primary nodal T/NK-cell lymphoma shows a distinct molecular signature and copy number changes.

Authors:  Siok-Bian Ng; Tae-Hoon Chung; Seiichi Kato; Shigeo Nakamura; Emiko Takahashi; Young-Hyeh Ko; Joseph D Khoury; C Cameron Yin; Richie Soong; Anand D Jeyasekharan; Michal Marek Hoppe; Viknesvaran Selvarajan; Soo-Yong Tan; Soon-Thye Lim; Choon-Kiat Ong; Maarja-Liisa Nairismägi; Priyanka Maheshwari; Shoa-Nian Choo; Shuangyi Fan; Chi-Kuen Lee; Shih-Sung Chuang; Wee-Joo Chng
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  RNA-seq of newly diagnosed patients in the PADIMAC study leads to a bortezomib/lenalidomide decision signature.

Authors:  Michael A Chapman; Jonathan Sive; John Ambrose; Claire Roddie; Nicholas Counsell; Anna Lach; Mahnaz Abbasian; Rakesh Popat; Jamie D Cavenagh; Heather Oakervee; Matthew J Streetly; Stephen Schey; Mickey Koh; Fenella Willis; Andres E Virchis; Josephine Crowe; Michael F Quinn; Gordon Cook; Charles R Crawley; Guy Pratt; Mark Cook; Nivette Braganza; Toyin Adedayo; Paul Smith; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Roger G Owen; Pieter Sonneveld; Jonathan J Keats; Javier Herrero; Kwee Yong
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.476

10.  Targeting UCHL1 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma with t(4;14).

Authors:  Parin Kamseng; Teerapong Siriboonpiputtana; Teeraya Puavilai; Suporn Chuncharunee; Karan Paisooksantivatana; Takol Chareonsirisuthigul; Mutita Junking; Wannasiri Chiraphapphaiboon; Pa-Thai Yenchitsomanus; Budsaba Rerkamnuaychoke
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.