Literature DB >> 20884712

Proliferation is a central independent prognostic factor and target for personalized and risk-adapted treatment in multiple myeloma.

Dirk Hose1, Thierry Rème, Thomas Hielscher, Jérôme Moreaux, Tobias Messner, Anja Seckinger, Axel Benner, John D Shaughnessy, Bart Barlogie, Yiming Zhou, Jens Hillengass, Uta Bertsch, Kai Neben, Thomas Möhler, Jean François Rossi, Anna Jauch, Bernard Klein, Hartmut Goldschmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proliferation of malignant plasma cells is a strong adverse prognostic factor in multiple myeloma and simultaneously targetable by available (e.g. tubulin polymerase inhibitors) and upcoming (e.g. aurora kinase inhibitors) compounds. DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed proliferation using gene expression-based indices in 757 samples including independent cohorts of 298 and 345 samples of CD138-purified myeloma cells from previously untreated patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, together with clinical prognostic factors, chromosomal aberrations, and gene expression-based high-risk scores.
RESULTS: In the two cohorts, 43.3% and 39.4% of the myeloma cell samples showed a proliferation index above the median plus three standard deviations of normal bone marrow plasma cells. Malignant plasma cells of patients in advanced stages or those harboring disease progression-associated gain of 1q21 or deletion of 13q14.3 showed significantly higher proliferation indices; patients with gain of chromosome 9, 15 or 19 (hyperdiploid samples) had significantly lower proliferation indices. Proliferation correlated with the presence of chromosomal aberrations in metaphase cytogenetics. It was significantly predictive for event-free and overall survival in both cohorts, allowed highly predictive risk stratification (e.g. event-free survival 12.7 versus 26.2 versus 40.6 months, P < 0.001) of patients, and was largely independent of clinical prognostic factors, e.g. serum β₂-microglobulin, International Staging System stage, associated high-risk chromosomal aberrations, e.g. translocation t(4;14), and gene expression-based high-risk scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Proliferation assessed by gene expression profiling, being independent of serum-β₂-microglobulin, International Staging System stage, t(4;14), and gene expression-based risk scores, is a central prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Surrogating a biological targetable variable, gene expression-based assessment of proliferation allows selection of patients for risk-adapted anti-proliferative treatment on the background of conventional and gene expression-based risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884712      PMCID: PMC3012769          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2010.030296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  41 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; W Michael Kuehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Inhibitors of kinesin motor proteins--research and clinical progress.

Authors:  David M Duhl; Paul A Renhowe
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2005-07

3.  The molecular classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; James P Stewart; Ichiro Hanamura; Sushil Gupta; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Burington; Elias Anaissie; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Total therapy 2 without thalidomide in comparison with total therapy 1: role of intensified induction and posttransplantation consolidation therapies.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot; Erik Rasmussen; Elias Anaissie; Frits van Rhee; Maurizio Zangari; Athanasios Fassas; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; John Shaughnessy; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Delineation of distinct subgroups of multiple myeloma and a model for clonal evolution based on interphase cytogenetics.

Authors:  Friedrich W Cremer; Jelena Bila; Isabelle Buck; Mutlu Kartal; Dirk Hose; Carina Ittrich; Axel Benner; Marc S Raab; Ann-Cathrin Theil; Marion Moos; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Claus R Bartram; Anna Jauch
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers.

Authors:  C M Perou; S S Jeffrey; M van de Rijn; C A Rees; M B Eisen; D T Ross; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S X Zhu; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The level of TACI gene expression in myeloma cells is associated with a signature of microenvironment dependence versus a plasmablastic signature.

Authors:  Jérôme Moreaux; Friedrich W Cremer; Thierry Reme; Marc Raab; Karene Mahtouk; Philine Kaukel; Veronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Eric Jourdan; Anna Jauch; Eric Legouffe; Marion Moos; Genevieve Fiol; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jean François Rossi; Dirk Hose; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Frequent gain of chromosome band 1q21 in plasma-cell dyscrasias detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization: incidence increases from MGUS to relapsed myeloma and is related to prognosis and disease progression following tandem stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Ichiro Hanamura; James P Stewart; Yongsheng Huang; Fenghuang Zhan; Madhumita Santra; Jeffrey R Sawyer; Klaus Hollmig; Maurizio Zangarri; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Frits van Rhee; Federica Cavallo; Bart Burington; John Crowley; Guido Tricot; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Ploidy, as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, defines different subgroups in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Wuilleme; N Robillard; L Lodé; F Magrangeas; H Beris; J-L Harousseau; J Proffitt; S Minvielle; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Cyclin D dysregulation: an early and unifying pathogenic event in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; W Michael Kuehl; Fenghuang Zhan; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Barlogie; John Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  91 in total

Review 1.  Many multiple myelomas: making more of the molecular mayhem.

Authors:  Marta Chesi; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The use of molecular-based risk stratification and pharmacogenomics for outcome prediction and personalized therapeutic management of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sarah K Johnson; Christoph J Heuck; Anthony P Albino; Pingping Qu; Qing Zhang; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  DNA repair pathways in human multiple myeloma: role in oncogenesis and potential targets for treatment.

Authors:  Claire Gourzones-Dmitriev; Alboukadel Kassambara; Surinder Sahota; Thierry Rème; Jérôme Moreaux; Pascal Bourquard; Dirk Hose; Philippe Pasero; Angelos Constantinou; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  DNA methylation score is predictive of myeloma cell sensitivity to 5-azacitidine.

Authors:  Jerome Moreaux; Angelique Bruyer; Jean-Luc Veyrune; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Dirk Hose; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  Gene Expression Profiles in Myeloma: Ready for the Real World?

Authors:  Raphael Szalat; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Impact of gene expression profiling-based risk stratification in patients with myeloma receiving initial therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Hajime Uno; Susanna J Jacobus; Scott A Van Wier; Greg J Ahmann; Kimberly J Henderson; Natalie S Callander; Jessica L Haug; David S Siegel; Philip R Greipp; Rafael Fonseca; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Inhibiting the osteocyte-specific protein sclerostin increases bone mass and fracture resistance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Michaela R Reagan; Scott E Youlten; Sindhu T Mohanty; Anja Seckinger; Rachael L Terry; Jessica A Pettitt; Marija K Simic; Tegan L Cheng; Alyson Morse; Lawrence M T Le; David Abi-Hanna; Ina Kramer; Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Irene M Ghobrial; Paul A Baldock; David G Little; Michaela Kneissel; Karin Vanderkerken; J H Duncan Bassett; Graham R Williams; Babatunde O Oyajobi; Dirk Hose; Tri G Phan; Peter I Croucher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  NEK2 induces drug resistance mainly through activation of efflux drug pumps and is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma and other cancers.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Ye Yang; Jiliang Xia; He Wang; Mohamed E Salama; Wei Xiong; Hongwei Xu; Shashirekha Shetty; Tiehua Chen; Zhaoyang Zeng; Lei Shi; Maurizio Zangari; Rodney Miles; David Bearss; Guido Tricot; Fenghuang Zhan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Krüppel-like factor 4 blocks tumor cell proliferation and promotes drug resistance in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Matthieu Schoenhals; Alboukadel Kassambara; Jean-Luc Veyrune; Jerome Moreaux; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Dirk Hose; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Molecular pathogenesis of multiple myeloma: basic and clinical updates.

Authors:  Marta Chesi; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.