| Literature DB >> 26667226 |
Benno H W Hendriks1, Andrea J R Balthasar2, Gerald W Lucassen3, Marjolein van der Voort4, Manfred Mueller5, Vishnu V Pully6, Torre M Bydlon7, Christian Reich8, Arnold T M H van Keersop9, Jeroen Kortsmit10, Gerrit C Langhout11, Geert-Jan van Geffen12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia has several advantages over general anesthesia but requires accurate needle placement to be effective. To achieve accurate placement, a needle equipped with optical fibers that allows tissue discrimination at the needle tip based on optical spectroscopy is proposed. This study investigates the sensitivity and specificity with which this optical needle can discriminate nerves from the surrounding tissues making use of different classification methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26667226 PMCID: PMC4678621 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0739-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Schematic drawing of the nerve and the surrounding tissues
Fig. 2Histology slides of the nerves and surrounding tissues studied: cross section of the cervical nerve (C6-root) with some surrounding areolar tissue proximal (a) and distal (b); cross section of the median nerve proximal (c) and distal (d), subcutaneous fat (e) and muscle (f)
Fig. 3Picture of the optical console (left) and the optical needle (right) used in the measurements
Fig. 4Averaged spectra measured for the four tissue classes
Fig. 5Boxplots of the various parameters derived from the fit model. Note the plots have been adjusted to maximize visualization of the boxes and whiskers; therefore not all outliers are shown
Classification results according to SVM, PLS-DA and CART for discrimination of fascicular tissue of the nerve from the surrounding tissues
| Classification method | Feature selection | MCC | ACC | SENS (%) | SPEC (%) | PPV | NPV | TP | FN | FP | TN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | Fit | 0.711 | 0.854 | 82.6 | 88.8 | 0.901 | 0.806 | 580 | 122 | 64 | 508 |
| SVM | PCA | 0.793 | 0.897 | 89.9 | 89.5 | 0.913 | 0.878 | 631 | 71 | 60 | 512 |
| SVM | Segments | 0.779 | 0.890 | 88.6 | 89.5 | 0.912 | 0.865 | 622 | 80 | 60 | 512 |
| SVM | Combined | 0.826 | 0.914 | 91.3 | 91.4 | 0.929 | 0.896 | 641 | 61 | 49 | 523 |
| PLSDA | 10PC’s | 0.814 | 0.907 | 92.5 | 89.5 | 0.864 | 0.943 | 494 | 40 | 78 | 662 |
| CART | Fit | 0.615 | 0.808 | 81.2 | 80.4 | 0.836 | 0.777 | 570 | 132 | 112 | 460 |
For SVM different feature selection methods are used: fit parameters, PCA, segments and a combination of the last three. For PLSDA, 10 principal components have been used (10PC’s). For the CART analysis, the fit parameters have been used as features
Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC see Eq. 2 text), accuracy (ACC = [TP + TN]/[TP + FN + FP + TN]), sensitivity (SENS = TP/[TP + FN]), specificity (SPEC = TN/[FP + TN]), positive predictive value (PPV = TP/[TP + FP]), negative predictive value (NPV = TN/[TN + FN]), true positive (TP), false negative (FN), false positive (FP), true negative (TN)
Classification results according to SVM, PLS-DA and CART for discrimination of fascicular tissue of the median nerve from the surrounding tissues validation data collected in the forearm area) when training the various methods using data collected in the neck area
| Classification method | Feature selection | MCC | ACC | SENS (%) | SPEC (%) | PPV | NPV | TP | FN | FP | TN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | Fit | 0.683 | 0.848 | 85.0 | 84.6 | 0.765 | 0.906 | 91 | 16 | 28 | 154 |
| SVM | PCA | 0.693 | 0.855 | 83.2 | 86.8 | 0.788 | 0.898 | 89 | 18 | 24 | 158 |
| SVM | Segments | 0.717 | 0.862 | 88.8 | 84.6 | 0.772 | 0.928 | 95 | 12 | 28 | 154 |
| SVM | Combined | 0.751 | 0.882 | 86.9 | 89.0 | 0.823 | 0.920 | 93 | 14 | 20 | 162 |
| PLSDA | 10PC’s | 0.580 | 0.789 | 84.1 | 75.8 | 0.672 | 0.890 | 90 | 17 | 44 | 138 |
| CART | Fit | 0.442 | 0.730 | 71.0 | 74.2 | 0.618 | 0.813 | 76 | 31 | 47 | 135 |