| Literature DB >> 26665155 |
Ravin Jugdaohsingh1, Liliana D Pedro1, Abigail Watson2, Jonathan J Powell1.
Abstract
Silicon and boron share many similarities, both chemically and biochemically, including having similar effects on bone, although their mechanisms of action are not known. Here we compared the loading of silicon and boron into bone, their localization and how they are influenced by age (growth & development), to obtain further clues as to the biological effects of these elements and, especially, to see if they behave the same or not. Bone samples were obtained from two different studies where female Sprague Dawley rats had been maintained on a normal maintenance diet for up to 43 weeks. Total bone elemental levels were determined by ICP-OES following microwave assisted acid digestion. Silicon and boron levels in the decalcified bones (i.e. the collagen fraction) were also investigated. Silicon and boron showed marked differences in loading and in their localization in bone. Highest silicon and lowest boron concentrations were found in the under-mineralized bone of younger rats and lowest silicon and highest boron concentrations were found in the fully mineralized bone of the adult rat. Overall, however total bone silicon content increased with age, as did boron content, the latter mirroring the increase in calcium (mineral) content of bone. However, whereas silicon showed equal distribution in the collagen and mineral fractions of bone, boron was exclusively localized in the mineral fraction. These findings confirm the reported association between silicon and collagen, especially at the early stages of bone mineralization, and show that boron is associated with the bone mineral but not connective tissues. These data suggest that silicon and boron have different biological roles and that one is unlikely, therefore, to substitute for the other, or at least boron would not substitute for Si in the connective tissues. Finally, we noted that silicon levels in the mineral fraction varied greatly between the two studies, suggesting that one or more nutritional factor(s) may influence the loading of Si into the mineral fraction of bone. This and the nature of the interaction between Si and collagen deserve further attention.Entities:
Keywords: B, boron; Bone; Bone mineralisation; Boron; Collagen; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; Growth and development; ICP-OES, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy; SGIF, simulated gastrointestinal fluid; Si, silicon; Silicon; UHP, ultra-high purity
Year: 2014 PMID: 26665155 PMCID: PMC4643752 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2014.10.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Rep ISSN: 2352-1872
Silicon, boron and calcium contents of the maintenance diets used in Study 1 and Study 2 analyzed directly by the authors.a
| B&K Rat and Mouse Standard Diet (Study 1) | SDS RM1 Expanded Diet (Study 2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Si (μg/g) | 322 (47) | 628 (66) |
| B (μg/g) | 7.42 (0.62) | 9.12 (0.50) |
| Ca (mg/g) | 8.85 (1.48) | 11.76 (1.08) |
Nutrient contents of the diets, supplied by the manufacturers, are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Bioavailability of Si from the two diets were similar: 37% and 33% for the B&K and SDS RM1 diets, respectively (see Supplementary data).
Note, this is higher than the 7.3 mg/g given by the feed company (Supplementary Table 1).
Study 1: Bone elemental concentrations and contents in the adult humeral bone of female Sprague Dawley rats.a
| Elements | Concentration | Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Units | Mean (SD) | Units | |
| Si | 16.39 (3.80) | μg/g | 5.80 (1.68) | μg |
| B | 1.59 (0.13) | μg/g | 0.555 (0.049) | μg |
| Mn | 0.421 (0.020) | μg/g | 0.147 (0.008) | μg |
| Cu | 0.858 (0.176) | μg/g | 0.298 (0.050) | μg |
| Zn | 231.8 (14.6) | μg/g | 80.9 (4.2) | μg |
| Mg | 4.22 (0.25) | mg/g | 1.47 (0.09) | mg |
| K | 1.71 (0.21) | mg/g | 0.594 (0.044) | mg |
| P | 100.8 (4.0) | mg/g | 35.2 (1.6) | mg |
| Ca | 210.9 (3.5) | mg/g | 73.8 (5.0) | mg |
n = 5 rats aged 29 weeks.
Mean wet weight of bones = 0.350 (± 0.023) g.
Fig. 1Study 1: Distribution of elements in the decalcified adult humerus bone from female Sprague Dawley rats, shown as a percentage of the total (i.e. whole) bone content. A high percentage of silicon was associated with the decalcified bone (i.e. collagen fraction). In contrast, boron was undetected in the decalcified bone. Insert graph shows the content (i.e. amount, in μg) of trace element in the decalcified bone. Data are means ± SD of five bones.
Fig. 2Study 2: Silicon (a), boron (b) and calcium (c) concentrations of the tibia bone from female Sprague Dawley rats of different ages (weanling to adults). Silicon concentrations decreased with age, in contrast to boron and calcium concentrations which increased with age. Data are means ± SD of n = 8–10 bones.
Fig. 3Study 2: Total silicon (a), boron (b) and calcium (c) contents of the tibia bone from female Sprague Dawley rats of different ages (weanling to adults); closed squares. Data are means ± SD of n = 8–10 rats. Silicon, boron and calcium contents of the (paired) decalcified tibia bone (closed circles) are also shown. Data are means ± SD of three rats. A high level of Si was associated with the collagen fraction of bone, in contrast boron and calcium were only associated with the inorganic mineral phase.
Fig. 4Study 2: (a) Collagen concentration (mg/g wet weight; open circles) and (b) collagen content (mg; closed circles) of the decalcified tibia bones from female Sprague Dawley rats of different ages (weanling to adults). (b) The molar ratio of collagen:Si in the decalcified bone is shown (closed triangles). Data are means ± SE of n = 3–5 rat bones per age group.
Fig. 5Comparison of adult (26 and 29 week old) rat bones from Studies 1 & 2: bone Si concentrations in the collagen (black) and mineral (white) phases (a), feed Si concentrations (b), bioavailability of Si in the feed (c) and fasting serum Si concentrations (d). Data are means ± SD of 3–8 samples.