| Literature DB >> 18550464 |
Ravin Jugdaohsingh1, Mario R Calomme, Karen Robinson, Forrest Nielsen, Simon H C Anderson, Patrick D'Haese, Piet Geusens, Nigel Loveridge, Richard P H Thompson, Jonathan J Powell.
Abstract
Silicon-deficiency studies in growing animals in the early 1970s reported stunted growth and profound defects in bone and other connective tissues. However, more recent attempts to replicate these findings have found mild alterations in bone metabolism without any adverse health effects. Thus the biological role of silicon remains unknown. Using a specifically formulated silicon-depleted diet and modern methods for silicon analysis and assessment of skeletal development, we undertook, through international collaboration between silicon researchers, an extensive study of long-term silicon depletion on skeletal development in an animal. 21-day old female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=20) were fed a silicon-depleted diet (3.2 microg Si/g feed) for 26 weeks and their growth and skeletal development were compared with identical rats (n=10) on the same diet but with silicon added as Si(OH)(4) to their drinking water (53.2 microg Si/g water); total silicon intakes were 24 times different. A third group of rats, receiving a standard rodent stock feed (322 microg Si/g feed) and tap water (5 microg Si/g water), served as a reference group for optimal growth. A series of anthropometric and bone quality measures were undertaken during and following the study. Fasting serum silicon concentrations and especially urinary silicon excretion were significantly lower in the silicon-deprived group compared to the supplemented group (P=0.03 and 0.004, respectively). Tibia and soft-tissue silicon contents did not differ between the two groups, but tibia silicon levels were significantly lower compared to the reference group (P<0.0001). Outward adverse health effects were not observed in the silicon-deprived group. However, body lengths from week 18 onwards (P<0.05) and bone lengths at necropsy (P</=0.002) were longer in this group. Moreover, these measures correlated inversely with serum silicon concentrations (P</=0.02). A reduction in bone growth plate thickness and an apparent increase in chondrocyte density were also observed in the silicon-deprived animals. No other differences were observed between the two groups, except for tibia phosphorus concentrations, which were lower in the silicon-deprived animals (P=0.0003). Thus in this study we were unable to reproduce the profound deficiency state reported in rats and chicks in the early 1970s. Indeed, although silicon intake and circulating fasting serum levels differed between the silicon-deprived and silicon-supplemented animals, tibia and soft-tissue levels did not and may explain the lack of difference in bone quality and bone markers (except serum CTx) between these two groups. Markedly higher tibia silicon levels in the reference group and nutritional differences between the formulated low-Si and reference diets suggest that one or more co-factors may be absent from the low-Si diet that affect silicon incorporation into bone. However, evidence for urinary silicon conservation (to maintain tissue levels), changes in bone/body lengths, bone calcium:phosphorus ratio and differences at the growth plate with silicon deprivation are all novel and deserve further study. These results suggest that rats actively maintain body silicon levels via urinary conservation, but the low circulating serum silicon levels during silicon deficiency result in inhibition of growth plate closure and increased longitudinal growth. Silicon-responsive genes and Si transporters are being investigated in the kidneys of these rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18550464 PMCID: PMC2832730 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone ISSN: 1873-2763 Impact factor: 4.398
Compositions of the formulated low-silicon and standard rodent stock diets
| Components | Formulated low-Si diet | Standard rodent diet | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg | % total diet (w/w) | g/kg | % total diet (w/w) | |
| Protein | 1">120 | 12 | 18 | |
| Carbohydrate and fibre | 2">400 | 40 | 61 | |
| Glucose | 4.38 | 0.44 | ||
| Sucrose | 367 | 36.7 | ||
| Oil | 3">50 | 5 | 2.5 | |
| Choline | 0.56 | 0.056 | 1.22 | |
| 10 | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| 5 | 0.5 | 1 | ||
| Cystine | 0.57 | |||
| Ash | 5.5 | |||
| Vitamin mix | 4.55 g/kg | 0.455% TD | ||
| Mineral mix | 20 | 2 | 4.40 | |
| Vitamin mix composition | mg/kg | IU/kg | mg/kg | IU/kg |
| dl-A-trocophenol (vit. E) | 200 | 104 | ||
| Vitamin A | 16 | 8000 | 12000 | |
| Vitamin D3 | 3.8 | 1520 | 1500 | |
| Menadione (vit. K) | 1 | 15 | ||
| Biotin (vit. B7) | 1 | 0.334 | ||
| Folic acid (vit. M) | 2 | 2.5 | ||
| Inositol | 50 | |||
| Niacin (vit. B3) | 30 | 78 | ||
| D-Ca pantothenate (vit. B5) | 10 | 26 | ||
| Riboflavin (Vit B2) | 27 | 11 | ||
| Thiamine HCl (vit. B1) | 10 | 14 | ||
| Pyridoxine HCl (vit. B6) | 15 | 14 | ||
| Cyanocobalamin (vit. B12) | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
| PABA (vit. Bx) | 5 | |||
| Mineral mix elemental composition | Reported mg/kg | Observed | Reported mg/kg | Observed |
| Ca | 5006 | 5387 (367) | 8800 | 8849 (1481) |
| K | 3659 | 3271 (725) | 7000 | 7714 (476) |
| Na | 828 | 3400 | ||
| Mg | 499 | 412 (16) | 1600 | 1680 (81) |
| Mn | 50.4 | 55.6 (10.9) | 68 | 66.1 (4.0) |
| Zn | 44.7 | 49.7 (6.7) | 95 | 103.8 (18.6) |
| Fe | 35.2 | 36.2 (1.3) | 104 | 145.4 (10.6) |
| Cu | 5.09 | 4.57 (1.03) | 20 | 18.3 (1.98) |
| Se | 0.15 | 0.36 | ||
| Mo | 0.25 | |||
| B | 1.05 | 0.98 (0.17) | 7.42 (0.62) | |
| Co | 0.002 | 0.46 | ||
| Si | N/P | 3.19 (0.64) | N/P | 322.4 (47.3) |
| P | 2276 | 7000 | ||
| F | 0.91 | |||
5consists of wheat meal, barley meal, Soya meal, wheat feed, fish meal, fats and oils, minerals and trace elements, molasses, N/P = not provided, TD = total diet. Consists of wheat meal, barley meal, Soya meal, wheat-feed, fish meal, fats and oils, minerals and trace elements, molasses.">Consists of wheat meal, barley meal, Soya meal, wheat-feed, fish meal, fats and oils, minerals and trace elements, molasses.
Washed casein.
Acid washed corn.
Corn oil.
Measured by ICPOES following microwave digestion.
Fig. 1Fasting serum Si (A) and urinary Si excretion (B), and Si contents of the left tibia (C) and liver (D) of the rats in the Si-deprived group (n = 20 rats), Si-supplemented group (n = 10) and reference group (n = 10 rats on the standard rodent stock feed). [Urine samples were only available for eight rats in the Si-deprived group, five rats in the Si-supplemented group and seven rats in the reference group.] Fasting serum Si and urinary Si excretion were significantly lower in the Si-deprived group compared to the Si-supplemented group (P = 0.03 and P = 0.004, respectively; unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). However, there were no significant differences in Si contents of the left tibia and the liver between the two groups.
Fasting serum elements in the Si-deprived, Si-supplemented and reference group of animals
| Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum Concentrations | Si-deprived ( | Si-supplemented ( | Reference group ( |
| Ca (mg/L) | 149 (3.4) | 149 (3.5) | 146 (4.6) |
| P (mg/L) | 242 (19) | 295 (33) | 275 (40) |
| Mg (mg/L) | 43.8 (1.2) | 44.1 (0.59) | 46.8 (1.9) |
| K (mg/L) | 452 (28) | 482 (25) | 491 (37) |
| Zn (mg/L) | 1.17 (0.03) | 1.21 (0.04) | 1.09 (0.07) |
| Cu (mg/L) | 2.05 (0.09) | 1.88 (0.10) | 2.04 (0.10) |
| Mn (μg/L) | 11.8 (4.3) | 14.2 (7.6) | 12.2 (3.7) |
Means (± SE) of samples collected at necropsy. No significant differences between the Si-deprived and Si-supplemented groups (Student t-test). Reference group is standard rodent stock feed-fed animals.
Element concentrations in tibia in the Si-deprived, Si-supplemented and reference group of animals
| Element | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Si-deprived ( | Si-supplemented ( | Reference group ( | |
| Ca (mg/g) | 193 (1) | 190 (2) | 192 (1) |
| P (mg/g) | 105 (2) | 117 (3)⁎ | 113 (3) |
| Na (mg/g) | 5.07 (0.11) | 5.21 (0.05) | 5.16 (0.07) |
| Mg (mg/g) | 3.29 (0.04) | 3.29 (0.05) | 3.63 (0.03) |
| K (mg/g) | 1.33 (0.04) | 1.39 (0.03) | 1.19 (0.03) |
| Zn (mg/g) | 0.227 (0.002) | 0.228 (0.006) | 0.185 (0.003) |
| Fe (mg/g) | 0.076 (0.006) | 0.083 (0.012) | 0.069 (0.006) |
| Cu (μg/g) | 1.06 (0.06) | 1.05 (0.12) | 0.875 (0.037) |
| Mn (μg/g) | 0.214 (0.008) | 0.196 (0.014) | 0.186 (0.007) |
Means (± SE).
⁎P < 0.001 versus Si-deprived group (Student's t-test). No other significant differences between the Si-deprived and Si-supplemented groups. Reference group is standard rodent stock feed-fed animals.
Fig. 2Body weights (A) and lengths (B) of the rats in the Si-deprived (solid squares; n = 20 rats) and Si-supplemented (open circles; n = 10 rats) groups. There was no significant difference in body weights between the two groups; however, rats in the Si-deprived group were significantly longer from weeks 18 onwards (P ≤ 0.046 → P < 0.01; RM-ANOVA) compared to the Si-supplemented group. Body weight and length are also shown for the standard rodent stock feed-fed group as a reference for normal rats (dotted lines).
Fig. 3Length of femurs (A), left tibia (B) and humeri (C) of the rats in the Si-deprived (n = 20) and Si-supplemented (n = 10) groups and correlations between fasting serum Si concentrations at necropsy and lengths of, femurs (D), left tibia (E), and humeri (F), of rats in the Si-deprived (squares) and Si-supplemented (circles) groups. The limb bones of the rats in the Si-deprived group were significantly longer compared to the rats in the Si-supplemented group (P = 0.0002 at the femur; P = 0.002 at the left tibia; and P = 0.0006 at the humerus; unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test) and inversely correlated with fasting serum Si concentrations (r = − 0.53, P = 0.006 for femurs; r = − 0.47, P = 0.016 for the left tibia; and r = − 0.52, P = 0.007 for humeri). Two outliers (one in each group), with markedly higher Si concentrations (> 300 µg/L) compared to the group mean/median, are likely to represent inadvertent contamination upon sample collection (despite the great care taken) and are shown, but were not included in the correlations. Lengths of the limb bones are also shown for the standard rodent stock feed-fed group as a reference for normal rats.
Fig. 4Growth plate of the right tibia (A) and higher magnification images in the Si-deprived (B1 and B2), Si-supplemented (C1 and C2) and standard rodent stock feed-fed (D1 and D2) groups. Growth plates from two animals (1 and 2) are shown as representative for each group. Growth plate thickness was reduced, while chondrocyte cell density appears to be slightly increased in the Si-deprived group (B1 and B2) compared to the Si-supplemented and standard rodent stock feed-fed reference groups.
Fig. 5Bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip (four hip sites and total hip; A) and lumbar spine (L1–L4; B) of rats in the Si-deprived (grey bars; n = 20 rats) and Si-supplemented (black bars; n = 10 rats) groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups (Si-deprived vs. Si-supplemented; unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test). BMDs are also shown for the standard rodent stock feed-fed group as a reference for normal rats (hollow dash bars).
Fig. 6Serum CTx measured at necropsy (A) in the Si-deprived (n = 20 rats), Si-supplemented (n = 10) and standard rodent stock feed-fed reference (n = 10) groups. Serum CTx was significantly lower (P = 0.04; unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test) in the Si-supplemented group compared to the Si-deprived group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (Si-deprived (squares) and Si-supplemented (circles)) in the monthly samples collected during the study (B). Mean monthly serum CTx is also shown for the standard rodent stock feed-fed group as a reference for normal rats (dotted line).
Fig. 7Serum estradiol measured at necropsy in the Si-deprived (n = 20 rats), Si-supplemented (n = 10) and standard rodent stock feed-fed reference (n = 10) groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Si-deprived vs. Si-supplemented; unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test), nor was there any association with the other measures collected (serum Si, bone length, body length, etc.).
Bone remodelling markers in the Si-deprived, Si-supplemented and reference group of animals
| Markers | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Si-deprived ( | Si-supplemented ( | Reference group ( | |
| Osteocalcin (ng/mL) | 129 (13) | 140 (20) | 123 (17) |
| ALP (U/mL) | 1.36 (0.09) | 1.35 (0.07) | 1.38 (0.13) |
| Osteopontin (ng/mL) | 29.6 (2.3) | 32.2 (2.6) | 33.3 (2.7) |
| Sialic acid (mg/100 mL) | 144 (4) | 136 (5) | 138 (4) |
| iPTH (pg/mL) | 218 (35) | 174 (30) | 433 (71) |
| TRAP (U/L) | 3.27 (0.41) | 3.18 (0.40) | 3.62 (0.45) |
| PYD (nmol/L) | 4.12 (0.60) | 4.04 (0.54) | 3.45 (0.39) |
| CTx (μg/mmol cr) | 0.619 (0.162) | 0.392 (0.163) | 0.827 (0.282) |
| Helical peptide (μg/mmol cr) | 30.9 (3.0) | 27.2 (1.7) | 45.0 (2.4) |
| PYD (nmol/mmol cr) | 21.5 (1.5) | 22.9 (2.6) | 23.9 (1.7) |
| Total PYD (nmol/mmol cr) | 453 (106) | 350 (27) | 463 (58) |
| DPD (nmol/mmol cr) | 41.4 (7.7) | 46.1 (6.0) | 21.5 (5.6) |
| 22.4 (0.4) | 21.9 (0.4) | 20.6 (0.3) | |
Means (± SE).
⁎Urine samples were only available for eight rats in the Si-deprived group, five rats in the Si-supplemented group and seven rats in the reference group.
ALP = alkaline phosphatase, iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone, TRAP = tartrate resistant acid phosphatases, PYD = pyridinium cross-link, DPD = deoxy-pyridinium cross-link, CTx = C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen.
No significant differences between the Si-deprived and Si-supplemented groups. Reference group is standard rodent stock feed-fed animals.
Mechanical and histomorphometric analyses of the femur and tibia from the Si-deprived, Si-supplemented and reference group of animals
| Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Si-deprived ( | Si-supplemented ( | Reference group ( | |
| Torsion moment (Nm) | 0.67 (0.09) | 0.67 (0.07) | 0.74 (0.10 |
| Torsion angle (°) | 10.6 (1.9) | 11.1 (0.8) | 11.3 (1.9) |
| Torsion stiffness (Nm/rad) | 7.2 (1.7) | 6.5 (0.5) | 7.6 (1.9) |
| Energy absorbed (J) | 0.073 (0.014) | 0.076 (0.010) | 0.086 (0.020) |
| Bone area (%) | 25.9 (6.6) | 24.2 (11.1) | 33.7 (6.2) |
| Osteoid area (%) | 0.73 (0.83) | 0.49 (0.48) | 0.24 (0.21) |
| Osteoid width (μm) | 2.93 (0.51) | 2.81 (0.46) | 2.76 (0.21) |
| Osteoblast perimeter (%) | 35.7 (24.3) | 19.6 (16.8) | 19.2 (21.8) |
| Osteoclast perimeter (%) | 16.4 (17.4) | 13.7 (11.7) | 12.3 (9.0) |
| Mineral apposition rate (μm/day) | 2.19 (0.38) | 2.33 (0.46) | 2.15 (0.69) |
| Bone formation rate (μm2/mm2/day) | 875 (617) | 912 (883) | 554 (355) |
| Trabecular thickness (μm) | 60.3 (9.8) | 65.6 (10.0) | 66.2 (10.4) |
| Trabecular number (mm-1) | 5.47 (1.13) | 4.54 (1.64) | 6.47 (0.62) |
| Trabecular separation (μm) | 135 (66) | 202 (167) | 89.7 (20.4) |
Means (± SE). No significant difference between the Si-deprived and Si-supplemented groups.
Reference group is standard rodent stock feed-fed animals.