David Viladés Medel1,2, Rubén Leta3,4, Xavier Alomar Serralach4, Francesc Carreras Costa3,4, Guillem Pons-Lladó3,4. 1. Cardiac Imaging Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. dvilades@santpau.cat. 2. Clínica Creu Blanca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. dvilades@santpau.cat. 3. Cardiac Imaging Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Clínica Creu Blanca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of subtraction CTA on patients with highly calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) or previous implanted stents, in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. All conventional and subtraction CTA exams were performed using a 320-row CT. Subjective image quality score was assessed for each segment using a 4-point scale: 1-uninterpretable to 4-good image quality. RESULTS: A total of 129 calcified or stented coronary segments were studied. Mean coronary image quality with conventional CTA was 2.73 ± 0.97 and in subtracted CTA 3.3 ± 0.92 (p < 0.01). After metal subtraction, image quality in stented coronary segments with >3 mm of diameter improved from 2.69 ± 0.97 to 3.34 ± 0.89 (p = 0.01) and in those with <3 mm of diameter from 2.11 ± 0.78 to 2.67 ± 0.87 (p = 0.17). There was an improvement in diagnostic accuracy to detect ICA stenosis >50 % by subtraction CTA compared with conventional CTA (AUC 0.93 to 0.87; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Subtraction CTA is promising in overcoming limitations of conventional CTA due to calcium or metal artefacts, especially if no motion artefact is present or when stents > 3 mm are studied. KEY POINTS: • Calcium and metal artefacts are still a limitation for conventional coronary CTA • Diagnostic accuracy is improved by subtraction as compared with conventional CTA • Subtraction CTA is a promising tool to overcome limitations of conventional CTA.
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of subtraction CTA on patients with highly calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) or previous implanted stents, in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients were recruited. All conventional and subtraction CTA exams were performed using a 320-row CT. Subjective image quality score was assessed for each segment using a 4-point scale: 1-uninterpretable to 4-good image quality. RESULTS: A total of 129 calcified or stented coronary segments were studied. Mean coronary image quality with conventional CTA was 2.73 ± 0.97 and in subtracted CTA 3.3 ± 0.92 (p < 0.01). After metal subtraction, image quality in stented coronary segments with >3 mm of diameter improved from 2.69 ± 0.97 to 3.34 ± 0.89 (p = 0.01) and in those with <3 mm of diameter from 2.11 ± 0.78 to 2.67 ± 0.87 (p = 0.17). There was an improvement in diagnostic accuracy to detect ICA stenosis >50 % by subtraction CTA compared with conventional CTA (AUC 0.93 to 0.87; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Subtraction CTA is promising in overcoming limitations of conventional CTA due to calcium or metal artefacts, especially if no motion artefact is present or when stents > 3 mm are studied. KEY POINTS: • Calcium and metal artefacts are still a limitation for conventional coronary CTA • Diagnostic accuracy is improved by subtraction as compared with conventional CTA • Subtraction CTA is a promising tool to overcome limitations of conventional CTA.
Authors: Jacob Geleijns; Raoul M S Joemai; Marc Dewey; Albert de Roos; Maria Zankl; Alfonso Calzado Cantera; Marçal Salvadó Artells Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gilles Montalescot; Udo Sechtem; Stephan Achenbach; Felicita Andreotti; Chris Arden; Andrzej Budaj; Raffaele Bugiardini; Filippo Crea; Thomas Cuisset; Carlo Di Mario; J Rafael Ferreira; Bernard J Gersh; Anselm K Gitt; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Nikolaus Marx; Lionel H Opie; Matthias Pfisterer; Eva Prescott; Frank Ruschitzka; Manel Sabaté; Roxy Senior; David Paul Taggart; Ernst E van der Wall; Christiaan J M Vrints; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Juhani Knuuti; Marco Valgimigli; Héctor Bueno; Marc J Claeys; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Cetin Erol; Herbert Frank; Christian Funck-Brentano; Oliver Gaemperli; José R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Michalis Hamilos; David Hasdai; Steen Husted; Stefan K James; Kari Kervinen; Philippe Kolh; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Massimo F Piepoli; Axel R Pries; Francesco Romeo; Lars Rydén; Maarten L Simoons; Per Anton Sirnes; Ph Gabriel Steg; Adam Timmis; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Aylin Yildirir; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christian W Hamm; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Stefan Agewall; Jeroen Bax; Eric Boersma; Hector Bueno; Pio Caso; Dariusz Dudek; Stephan Gielen; Kurt Huber; Magnus Ohman; Mark C Petrie; Frank Sonntag; Miguel Sousa Uva; Robert F Storey; William Wijns; Doron Zahger Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Fleur R de Graaf; Joanne D Schuijf; Joëlla E van Velzen; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Johannes H C Reiber; Eric Boersma; Martin J Schalij; Fabrizio Spanó; J Wouter Jukema; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Andreas Fuchs; J Tobias Kühl; Marcus Y Chen; David Viladés Medel; Xavier Alomar; Sujata M Shanbhag; Steffen Helqvist; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Fang Li; Qing He; Lixue Xu; Yan Zhou; Yufei Sun; Zhenchang Wang; Yinghao Xu; Zhenghan Yang; Yi He Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-21