Literature DB >> 21512080

Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).

Jacob Geleijns1, Raoul M S Joemai, Marc Dewey, Albert de Roos, Maria Zankl, Alfonso Calzado Cantera, Marçal Salvadó Artells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the exposure of patients to radiation for the cardiac CT acquisition protocol of the multicenter Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 64-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (CORE 64) trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An algorithm for patient dose assessment with Monte Carlo dosimetry was developed for the Aquilion 64-MDCT scanner. During the CORE 64 study, different acquisition protocols were used depending on patient size and sex; therefore, six patient models were constructed representing three men and three women in the categories of small, normal size, and obese. Organ dose and effective dose resulting from the cardiac CT protocol were assessed for these six patient models.
RESULTS: The average effective dose for coronary CT angiography (CTA) calculated according to Report 103 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is 19 mSv (range, 16-26 mSv). The average effective dose for the whole cardiac CT protocol including CT scanograms, bolus tracking, and calcium scoring is slightly higher-22 mSv (range, 18-30 mSv). An average conversion factor for the calculation of effective dose from dose-length product of 0.030 mSv/mGy · cm was derived for coronary CTA.
CONCLUSION: The current methods of assessing patient dose are not well suited for cardiac CT acquisitions, and published effective dose values tend to underestimate effective dose. The effective dose of cardiac CT is approximately 25% higher when assessed according to the preferred ICRP Report 103 compared with ICRP Report 60. Underestimation of effective dose by 43% or 53% occurs in coronary CTA according to ICRP Report 103 when a conversion factor (E / DLP, where E is effective dose and DLP is dose-length product) for general chest CT of 0.017 or 0.014 mSv/mGy · cm, respectively, is used instead of 0.030 mSv/mGy · cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21512080     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

Review 1.  Low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography: where are the limits?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Carla M Thompson; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction.

Authors:  Ryoichi Tanaka; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kenta Muranaka; Takuya Chiba; Takanori Ueda; Tadashi Sasaki; Tetsuya Fusazaki; Shigeru Ehara
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Coronary Artery Disease: Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT Perfusion and MR Perfusion Imaging in Comparison with Quantitative Coronary Angiography and SPECT-Multicenter Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Marcus Y Chen; Andrea L Vavere; Benjamin Kendziora; Julie M Miller; W Patricia Bandettini; Christopher Cox; Richard T George; João Lima; Marcelo Di Carli; Michail Plotkin; Elke Zimmermann; Michael Laule; Peter Schlattmann; Andrew E Arai; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD).

Authors:  Peter K T Hui; Hyun Woo Goo; Jing Du; Janice J K Ip; Suzu Kanzaki; Young Jin Kim; Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Oktavia Lilyasari; Suvipaporn Siripornpitak
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24

Review 6.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Suhny Abbara; Marcus Y Chen; Ralph Gentry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

7.  Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Sandra Halliburton; Carla M Thompson; Yanping Xu; Anjali Chelliah; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Boyu Peng; M Robert Peters; Jill E Jacobs; Munir Ghesani; James J Jang; Hussein Al-Khalidi; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-16

8.  Detection of ischaemic myocardial lesions with coronary CT angiography and adenosine-stress dynamic perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: diagnostic performance in comparison with cardiac MRI.

Authors:  S M Kim; J-H Choi; S-A Chang; Y H Choe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Reliability of a new method for coronary artery calcium or metal subtraction by 320-row cardiac CT.

Authors:  David Viladés Medel; Rubén Leta; Xavier Alomar Serralach; Francesc Carreras Costa; Guillem Pons-Lladó
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Variability of radiation doses of cardiac diagnostic imaging tests: the RADIO-EVINCI study (RADIationdOse subproject of the EVINCI study).

Authors:  Clara Carpeggiani; Eugenio Picano; Marco Brambilla; Claudio Michelassi; Juhani Knuuti; Philipp Kauffman; S Richard Underwood; Danilo Neglia
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.