Literature DB >> 26660001

What Could You Really Learn on Your Own?: Understanding the Epistemic Limitations of Knowledge Acquisition.

Kristi L Lockhart1, Mariel K Goddu2, Eric D Smith3, Frank C Keil1.   

Abstract

Three studies explored the abilities of 205 children (5-11 years) and 74 adults (18-72 years) to distinguish directly versus indirectly acquired information in a scenario where an individual grew up in isolation from human culture. Directly acquired information is knowledge acquired through firsthand experience. Indirectly acquired information is knowledge that requires input from others. All children distinguished directly from indirectly acquired knowledge (Studies 1-3), even when the indirectly acquired knowledge was highly familiar (Study 2). All children also distinguished difficult-to-acquire direct knowledge from simple-to-acquire direct knowledge (Study 3). The major developmental change was the increasing ability to completely rule out indirect knowledge as possible for an isolated individual to acquire.
© 2015 The Authors. Child Development © 2015 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26660001      PMCID: PMC4809766          DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  34 in total

1.  Preschool children's difficulty understanding the types of information obtained through the five senses.

Authors:  D K O'Neill; S C Chong
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross; J Watson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 3.  Media as social partners: the social nature of young children's learning from screen media.

Authors:  Rebekah A Richert; Michael B Robb; Erin I Smith
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

4.  Hindsight Bias.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; Kathleen D Vohs
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-09

5.  Early understanding of perception as a source of knowledge.

Authors:  B H Pillow
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-02

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Missing the trees for the forest: a construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth.

Authors:  Adam L Alter; Daniel M Oppenheimer; Jeffrey C Zemla
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-09

8.  Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Edgar Erdfelder; Andrew N Meltzoff; William Peria; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Children's sensitivity to their own relative ignorance: handling of possibilities under epistemic and physical uncertainty.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Robinson; Martin G Rowley; Sarah R Beck; Dan J Carroll; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

10.  Knowing the limits of one's understanding: the development of an awareness of an illusion of explanatory depth.

Authors:  Candice M Mills; Frank C Keil
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2004-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.