Literature DB >> 26659714

Differential precision of corneal Pentacam HR measurements in early and advanced keratoconus.

Tom H Flynn1, Daya P Sharma1, Catey Bunce1, Mark R Wilkins1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serial Scheimpflug corneal tomography to monitor the progression of keratoconus has become standard practice in most countries where corneal cross-linking is available. The tomographic definitions of progression are, however, poorly defined. The aims of this study were: (a) to estimate the 95% limits of intraobserver and interobserver agreement of corneal shape parameters on Pentacam in patients with keratoconus and (b) to investigate whether these limits of agreement varied according to disease severity.
METHODS: 96 adult patients with keratoconus and no corneal scarring or history of previous surgery were recruited from a corneal clinic in a tertiary ophthalmology hospital. One eye of each subject was scanned twice by each of the two observers with the Pentacam HR. 95% limits of intraobserver and interobserver agreement for K1, K2, Kmax and corneal thickness at the thinnest corneal location (TCT) were calculated.
RESULTS: Reproducibility of keratometry measures was better for early keratoconus than advanced keratoconus. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage 1 or 2, the 95% limits of interobserver agreement for Kmax were from -0.90 to 1.01. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage >2, the 95% limits of interobserver agreement for Kmax were from -3.71 to 3.86.
CONCLUSIONS: Keratometric measurements on Pentacam HR are less reproducible in advanced keratoconus than in early keratoconus. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage 1 or 2, an increase in K1, K2 or Kmax of more than 1 dioptre is likely to represent the real change in the corneal shape. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659714     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of the measurements of a novel optical biometry: Nidek AL-Scan with Sirius and a ultrasound biometry.

Authors:  Çağatay Çağlar; Sücattin İlker Kocamış; Emre Demir; Mustafa Durmuş
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Placido disk-based topography versus high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera for corneal power measurements in keratoconic and post-LASIK eyes: reliability and agreement.

Authors:  Rachele R Penna; Ugo de Sanctis; Martina Catalano; Luca Brusasco; Federico M Grignolo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: primum non nocere.

Authors:  H Oliphant; M Zarei-Ghanavati; A Shalaby Bardan; A Vasquez-Perez; D O'Brart; C Liu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Bowman layer transplantation: 5-year results.

Authors:  Korine van Dijk; Jack S Parker; Lamis Baydoun; Abbas Ilyas; Isabel Dapena; Esther A Groeneveld-van Beek; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Paulina Escandon; Brenda Vasini; Sarah E Nicholas; Lyly Van; Deanna H Dang; Rebecca L Cunningham; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 19.704

6.  Repeatability of corneal elevation maps in keratoconus patients using the tomography matching method.

Authors:  YaRu Zheng; LiFang Huang; YiPing Zhao; JunJie Wang; XiaoBo Zheng; Wei Huang; Brendan Geraghty; QinMei Wang; ShiHao Chen; FangJun Bao; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Identifying more reliable parameters for the detection of change during the follow-up of mild to moderate keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Ivo Guber; Colm McAlinden; François Majo; Ciara Bergin
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Cataract Surgery in Patients with Keratoconus: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  F Aiello; Q J Nasser; C Nucci; R I Angunawela; Z Gatzioufas; V Maurino
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-07-31

9.  Macular Choroidal Thickening in Keratoconus Patients: Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Authors:  Rosa Gutierrez-Bonet; Jorge Ruiz-Medrano; Pablo Peña-Garcia; Muriel Catanese; Yalda Sadeghi; Katayoon Hashemi; Eric Gabison; José M Ruiz-Moreno
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Keratoconus in high-prevalence populations: Is it time for a screen-and-crosslink approach?

Authors:  Ahmed Zahir Al-Maskari
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.