Literature DB >> 26658862

Selective Attention to Auditory Memory Neurally Enhances Perceptual Precision.

Sung-Joo Lim1, Malte Wöstmann2, Jonas Obleser2.   

Abstract

Selective attention to a task-relevant stimulus facilitates encoding of that stimulus into a working memory representation. It is less clear whether selective attention also improves the precision of a stimulus already represented in memory. Here, we investigate the behavioral and neural dynamics of selective attention to representations in auditory working memory (i.e., auditory objects) using psychophysical modeling and model-based analysis of electroencephalographic signals. Human listeners performed a syllable pitch discrimination task where two syllables served as to-be-encoded auditory objects. Valid (vs neutral) retroactive cues were presented during retention to allow listeners to selectively attend to the to-be-probed auditory object in memory. Behaviorally, listeners represented auditory objects in memory more precisely (expressed by steeper slopes of a psychometric curve) and made faster perceptual decisions when valid compared to neutral retrocues were presented. Neurally, valid compared to neutral retrocues elicited a larger frontocentral sustained negativity in the evoked potential as well as enhanced parietal alpha/low-beta oscillatory power (9-18 Hz) during memory retention. Critically, individual magnitudes of alpha oscillatory power (7-11 Hz) modulation predicted the degree to which valid retrocues benefitted individuals' behavior. Our results indicate that selective attention to a specific object in auditory memory does benefit human performance not by simply reducing memory load, but by actively engaging complementary neural resources to sharpen the precision of the task-relevant object in memory. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Can selective attention improve the representational precision with which objects are held in memory? And if so, what are the neural mechanisms that support such improvement? These issues have been rarely examined within the auditory modality, in which acoustic signals change and vanish on a milliseconds time scale. Introducing a new auditory memory paradigm and using model-based electroencephalography analyses in humans, we thus bridge this gap and reveal behavioral and neural signatures of increased, attention-mediated working memory precision. We further show that the extent of alpha power modulation predicts the degree to which individuals' memory performance benefits from selective attention.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3516094-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alpha oscillations; attention to memory; electroencephalography; psychometric curve; retrocue

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26658862      PMCID: PMC6605502          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2674-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  80 in total

Review 1.  EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis.

Authors:  W Klimesch
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1999-04

2.  Removing irrelevant information from working memory: a cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task.

Authors:  K Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation.

Authors:  N E Loveless; A J Sanford
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Dick F Stegeman; Peter Praamstra; Adriaan van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory.

Authors:  Clayton E. Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Jack Gelfand; John Kounios; John E Lisman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN.

Authors:  W G WALTER; R COOPER; V J ALDRIDGE; W C MCCALLUM; A L WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Functional anatomy of pitch memory--an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.

Authors:  Nadine Gaab; Christian Gaser; Tino Zaehle; Lutz Jancke; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  J Gross; J Kujala; M Hamalainen; L Timmermann; A Schnitzler; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  14 in total

1.  Temporal Expectation Modulates the Cortical Dynamics of Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Anna Wilsch; Molly J Henry; Björn Herrmann; Christoph S Herrmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Common cortical architectures for phonological working memory identified in individual brains.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Prefrontal Lesions Disrupt Posterior Alpha-Gamma Coordination of Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Saeideh Davoudi; Mohsen Parto Dezfouli; Robert T Knight; Mohammad Reza Daliri; Elizabeth L Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Have We Forgotten Auditory Sensory Memory? Retention Intervals in Studies of Nonverbal Auditory Working Memory.

Authors:  Michael A Nees
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-02

9.  Aberrant brain response after auditory deviance in PTSD compared to trauma controls: An EEG study.

Authors:  Katrin A Bangel; Susanne van Buschbach; Dirk J A Smit; Ali Mazaheri; Miranda Olff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

Authors:  T M Vanessa Chan; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.