Literature DB >> 26656235

Early haemodynamic performance of a latest generation supra-annular aortic bioprosthesis: experience from a large single-centre series.

Marcus-André Deutsch1, Anatol Prinzing2, Kathrin Fiegl2, Michael Wottke2, Catalin C Badiu2, Markus Krane3, Gertrud Goppel2, Sabine Bleiziffer2, Ralf Guenzinger2, Ruediger Lange3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The St Jude Medical (SJM) Trifecta bioprosthesis is a recently introduced stented trileaflet pericardial valve designed for supra-annular replacement of the aortic valve (AVR). We sought to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome and haemodynamic performance of the Trifecta valve after AVR.
METHODS: A total of 837 patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation underwent AVR with the SJM Trifecta aortic valve prosthesis between January 2009 and March 2013. All intra- and postoperative data were collected prospectively. At discharge, transthoracic echocardiography was performed. A complete set of echocardiographic data was available in 723 patients.
RESULTS: Adjusted mean systolic pressure gradients (MPGs) for valve sizes 19 (n = 37/4.4%), 21 (n = 192/22.9%), 23 (n = 263/31.4%), 25 (n = 202/24.1%), 27 (n = 100/11.9%) and 29 mm (n = 42/5.0%) were 8.6 ± 1.1, 8.7 ± 0.4, 7.2 ± 0.3, 6.2 ± 0.3, 5.6 ± 0.3 and 3.9 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean effective orifice area (EOA) for valve sizes 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 29 mm were 1.5 ± 0.09, 1.6 ± 0.04, 1.9 ± 0.03, 2.0 ± 0.03, 2.2 ± 0.05 and 2.7 ± 0.01 cm(2), respectively. No patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was seen in 71.3% of patients (EOAI >0.85 cm(2)/m(2)). Moderate mismatch (EOAI 0.65-0.85 cm(2)/m(2)) was observed in 23.9% of patients, whereas severe PPM (EOAI <0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) occurred in 4.4% of patients. No malfunction of the prosthesis, endocarditis, valve thrombosis or relevant aortic regurgitation necessitating surgical revision was observed until discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The SJM Trifecta valve reveals an excellent early haemodynamic performance with low residual MPGs and a low incidence of PPM. Studies with longitudinal clinical and echocardiographic assessments with longer term follow-up evaluation including a comparison with other contemporary bioprostheses are needed.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Haemodynamics; Stented pericardial bioprosthesis; Trifecta valve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26656235     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Mid-term clinical and haemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Augustijn Mortelé; Alexander Dereu; Thierry Bové; Katrien François
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Serial echocardiographic evaluation of the Perimount Magna Ease prosthesis.

Authors:  Benedikt Mayr; Melchior Burri; Keti Vitanova; Anatol Prinzing; Gertrud Goppel; Markus Krane; Rüdiger Lange; Ralf Günzinger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch - what cardiac anesthesiologists need to know?

Authors:  Kathirvel Subramaniam; Soheyla Nazarnia
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Early and mid-term haemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ valve.

Authors:  Renata Raimundo; Soraia Moreira; Francisca Saraiva; Rui J Cerqueira; Pedro Teixeira; Elson Salgueiro; André Lourenço; Mário J Amorim; Jorge Almeida; Paulo Pinho; Adelino F Leite-Moreira
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  In vitro comparison of everting vs. non-everting suture techniques for the implantation of a supra-annular biological heart valve.

Authors:  Nazan Puluca; Andrea Münsterer; Anatol Prinzing; Zachary A Sexton; Rüdiger Lange; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Michael Scharfschwerdt
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.005

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.