Literature DB >> 26655078

Factors Determining the Efficiency of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Data Analysis with Over 200,000 Reconstructed Embryos.

Tianbin Liu1,2, Hongwei Dou1,2, Xi Xiang1,2, Lin Li1, Yong Li3, Lin Lin1,4, Xinzhi Pang3, Yijie Zhang1, Yu Chen3, Jing Luan3, Ying Xu3, Zhenzhen Yang3, Wenxian Yang3, Huan Liu3, Feida Li3, Hui Wang3, Huanming Yang3, Lars Bolund3,4, Gabor Vajta3,5, Yutao Du1,3.   

Abstract

Data analysis in somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) research is usually limited to several hundreds or thousands of reconstructed embryos. Here, we report mass results obtained with an established and consistent porcine SCNT system (handmade cloning [HMC]). During the experimental period, 228,230 reconstructed embryos and 82,969 blastocysts were produced. After being transferred into 656 recipients, 1070 piglets were obtained. First, the effects of different types of donor cells, including fetal fibroblasts (FFs), adult fibroblasts (AFs), adult preadipocytes (APs), and adult blood mesenchymal (BM) cells, were investigated on the further in vitro and in vivo development. Compared to adult donor cells (AFs, APs, BM cells, respectively), FF cells resulted in a lower blastocyst/reconstructed embryo rate (30.38% vs. 37.94%, 34.65%, and 34.87%, respectively), but a higher overall efficiency on the number of piglets born alive per total blastocysts transferred (1.50% vs. 0.86%, 1.03%, and 0.91%, respectively) and a lower rate of developmental abnormalities (10.87% vs. 56.57%, 24.39%, and 51.85%, respectively). Second, recloning was performed with cloned adult fibroblasts (CAFs) and cloned fetal fibroblasts (CFFs). When CAFs were used as the nuclear donor, fewer developmental abnormalities and higher overall efficiency were observed compared to AFs (56.57% vs. 28.13% and 0.86% vs. 1.59%, respectively). However, CFFs had an opposite effect on these parameters when compared with CAFs (94.12% vs. 10.87% and 0.31% vs. 1.50%, respectively). Third, effects of genetic modification on the efficiency of SCNT were investigated with transgenic fetal fibroblasts (TFFs) and gene knockout fetal fibroblasts (KOFFs). Genetic modification of FFs increased developmental abnormalities (38.96% and 25.24% vs. 10.87% for KOFFs, TFFs, and FFs, respectively). KOFFs resulted in lower overall efficiency compared to TFFs and FFs (0.68% vs. 1.62% and 1.50%, respectively). In conclusion, this is the first report of large-scale analysis of porcine cell nuclear transfer that provides important data for potential industrialization of HMC technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26655078      PMCID: PMC4677548          DOI: 10.1089/cell.2015.0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  59 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals.

Authors:  Hugh D Morgan; Fátima Santos; Kelly Green; Wendy Dean; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  A mammalian model for Laron syndrome produced by targeted disruption of the mouse growth hormone receptor/binding protein gene (the Laron mouse).

Authors:  Y Zhou; B C Xu; H G Maheshwari; L He; M Reed; M Lozykowski; S Okada; L Cataldo; K Coschigamo; T E Wagner; G Baumann; J J Kopchick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficient in vitro production of porcine blastocysts by handmade cloning with a combined electrical and chemical activation.

Authors:  P M Kragh; Y Du; T J Corydon; S Purup; L Bolund; G Vajta
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  in vitro development of porcine enucleated oocytes reconstructed by the transfer of porcine fetal fibroblasts and cumulus cells.

Authors:  S J Uhm; H M Chung; C Kim; H Shim; N H Kim; H T Lee; K S Chung
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Evidence for repeat-induced gene silencing in cultured Mammalian cells: inactivation of tandem repeats of transfected genes.

Authors:  Michael W McBurney; Tina Mai; Xiaofeng Yang; Karen Jardine
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2002-03-10       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Donna Kolber-Simonds; Kwang-Wook Park; Hee-Tae Cheong; Julia L Greenstein; Gi-Sun Im; Melissa Samuel; Aaron Bonk; August Rieke; Billy N Day; Clifton N Murphy; David B Carter; Robert J Hawley; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Fátima Santos; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Miodrag Stojkovic; Antoine Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Eckhard Wolf; Wolf Reik; Wendy Dean
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  High in vitro development after somatic cell nuclear transfer and trichostatin A treatment of reconstructed porcine embryos.

Authors:  J Li; O Svarcova; K Villemoes; P M Kragh; M Schmidt; I B Bøgh; Y Zhang; Y Du; L Lin; S Purup; Q Xue; L Bolund; H Yang; P Maddox-Hyttel; G Vajta
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  α-1,3-Galactosyltransferase knockout pig induced pluripotent stem cells: a cell source for the production of xenotransplant pigs.

Authors:  Yubing Liu; Jeong Yeh Yang; Yangqing Lu; Ping Yu; C Robert Dove; Jessica M Hutcheson; Jennifer L Mumaw; Steven L Stice; Franklin D West
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.987

10.  Production of transgenic and knockout pigs by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Angelica M Giraldo; Suyapa Ball; Kenneth R Bondioli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012
View more
  7 in total

1.  Back to the future: optimised microwell culture of individual human preimplantation stage embryos.

Authors:  Gábor Vajta; Lodovico Parmegiani; Zoltan Machaty; Wen Bin Chen; Sergey Yakovenko
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Successful cloning of an adult breeding boar from the novel Chinese Guike No. 1 swine specialized strain.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Nie; Xiang-Xing Zhu; Bing-Kun Xie; Su-Qun Nong; Qing-Yan Ma; Hui-Yan Xu; Xiao-Gan Yang; Yang-Qing Lu; Ke-Huan Lu; Yu-Ying Liao; Sheng-Sheng Lu
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Production of α1,3-galactosyltransferase and cytidine monophosphate-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase gene double-deficient pigs by CRISPR/Cas9 and handmade cloning.

Authors:  Hanchao Gao; Chengjiang Zhao; Xi Xiang; Yong Li; Yanli Zhao; Zesong Li; Dengke Pan; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Novel transgenic pigs with enhanced growth and reduced environmental impact.

Authors:  Xianwei Zhang; Zicong Li; Huaqiang Yang; Dewu Liu; Gengyuan Cai; Guoling Li; Jianxin Mo; Dehua Wang; Cuili Zhong; Haoqiang Wang; Yue Sun; Junsong Shi; Enqin Zheng; Fanming Meng; Mao Zhang; Xiaoyan He; Rong Zhou; Jian Zhang; Miaorong Huang; Ran Zhang; Ning Li; Mingzhe Fan; Jinzeng Yang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Integration of Large Transgene into Pig CEP112 Locus.

Authors:  Guoling Li; Xianwei Zhang; Haoqiang Wang; Jianxin Mo; Cuili Zhong; Junsong Shi; Rong Zhou; Zicong Li; Huaqiang Yang; Zhenfang Wu; Dewu Liu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Resurrecting biodiversity: advanced assisted reproductive technologies and biobanking.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Bolton; Andrew Mooney; Matt T Pettit; Anthony E Bolton; Lucy Morgan; Gabby J Drake; Ruth Appeltant; Susan L Walker; James D Gillis; Christina Hvilsom
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2022-06-30

7.  One-Step In Vitro Generation of ETV2-Null Pig Embryos.

Authors:  Marta Moya-Jódar; Giulia Coppiello; Juan Roberto Rodríguez-Madoz; Gloria Abizanda; Paula Barlabé; Amaia Vilas-Zornoza; Asier Ullate-Agote; Chiara Luongo; Ernesto Rodríguez-Tobón; Sergio Navarro-Serna; Evelyne París-Oller; Maria Oficialdegui; Xonia Carvajal-Vergara; Laura Ordovás; Felipe Prósper; Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez; Xabier L Aranguren
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.231

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.