Literature DB >> 26650571

What does Medicaid expansion mean for cancer screening and prevention? Results from a randomized trial on the impacts of acquiring Medicaid coverage.

Bill J Wright1, Alison K Conlin2, Heidi L Allen3, Jennifer Tsui4, Matthew J Carlson5, Hsin Fang Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Oregon Medicaid lottery provided a unique opportunity to assess the causal impacts of health insurance on cancer screening rates within the framework of a randomized controlled trial. Prior studies regarding the impacts of health insurance have almost always been limited to observational evidence, which cannot be used to make causal inferences.
METHODS: The authors prospectively followed a representative panel of 16,204 individuals from the Oregon Medicaid lottery reservation list, collecting data before and after the Medicaid lottery drawings. The study panel was divided into 2 groups: a treatment group of individuals who were selected in the Medicaid lottery (6254 individuals) and a control group who were not (9950 individuals). The authors also created an elevated risk subpanel based on family cancer histories. One year after the lottery drawings, differences in cancer screening rates, preventive behaviors, and health status were compared between the study groups.
RESULTS: Medicaid coverage resulted in significantly higher rates of several common cancer screenings, especially among women, as well as better primary care connections and self-reported health outcomes. There was little evidence found that acquiring Medicaid increased the adoption of preventive health behaviors that might reduce cancer risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid coverage did not appear to directly impact lifestyle choices that might reduce cancer risk, but it did provide access to important care and screenings that could help to detect cancers earlier. These findings could have long-term population health implications for states considering or pursuing Medicaid expansion. Cancer 2016;122:791-797.
© 2015 American Cancer Society. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; early detection of cancer; health behavior; health insurance; health status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26650571      PMCID: PMC6193753          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Melissa A Romaire; Susan G Haber; Florence K Tangka; Susan A Sabatino; David H Howard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  Adverse outcomes and lack of health insurance among newborns in an eight-county area of California, 1982 to 1986.

Authors:  P Braveman; G Oliva; M G Miller; R Reiter; S Egerter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Widening socioeconomic disparities in cervical cancer mortality among women in 26 states, 1993-2007.

Authors:  Edgar P Simard; Stacey Fedewa; Jiemen Ma; Rebecca Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Termination from Medi-Cal--does it affect health?

Authors:  N Lurie; N B Ward; M F Shapiro; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Sarah L Taubman; Heidi L Allen; Mira Bernstein; Jonathan H Gruber; Joseph P Newhouse; Eric C Schneider; Bill J Wright; Alan M Zaslavsky; Amy N Finkelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  18 in total

1.  Race, Age, Gender, and Insurance Status: A Comparative Analysis of Access to and Quality of Gastrointestinal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Omid Salehi; Eduardo A Vega; Christopher Lathan; Daria James; Olga Kozyreva; Sylvia V Alarcon; Onur C Kutlu; Beth Herrick; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The ACA and Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Georges Adunlin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Understanding the Impact of Insurance Coverage Across the Cancer Care Continuum: Moving Beyond Fragmented Systems and Cross-Sectional Data to Inform Policy.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Lindsay M Sabik; Joel C Cantor
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The Impact of Massachusetts Health Reform on Colorectal and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Kirsten Y Eom; Bassam Dahman; Jie Li; Nengliang Yao; G J van Londen; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Influence of Race, Insurance, Rurality, and Socioeconomic Status on Equity of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Mary M Leech; Julie E Weiss; Chad Markey; Andrew P Loehrer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Medicaid Expansion and Cancer Mortality by Race and Sex in Louisiana.

Authors:  Kevin Callison; Lindsey Segal; George Zacharia
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Catherine L Rohweder; Jennifer Leeman; Daniela B Friedman; Ziya Gizlice; Robin C Vanderpool; Natoshia Askelson; Alicia Best; Susan A Flocke; Karen Glanz; Linda K Ko; Michelle Kegler
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-12

8.  The effects of Medicaid on access to care and adherence to recommended preventive services.

Authors:  Steven C Hill; Salam Abdus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Early Medicaid Expansion and Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Justin M Barnes; Kimberly J Johnson; Eric Adjei Boakye; Lidia Schapira; Tomi Akinyemiju; Eliza M Park; Evan M Graboyes; Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 11.816

Review 10.  Lifetime Consequences of Early-Life and Midlife Access to Health Insurance: A Review.

Authors:  Étienne Gaudette; Gwyn C Pauley; Julie M Zissimopoulos
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.