Literature DB >> 25154930

Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.

Michael T Halpern1, Melissa A Romaire, Susan G Haber, Florence K Tangka, Susan A Sabatino, David H Howard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although state Medicaid programs cover cancer screening, Medicaid beneficiaries are less likely to be screened for cancer and are more likely to present with tumors of an advanced stage than are those with other insurance. The current study was performed to determine whether state Medicaid eligibility and reimbursement policies affect the receipt of breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening among Medicaid beneficiaries.
METHODS: Cross-sectional regression analyses of 2007 Medicaid data from 46 states and the District of Columbia were performed to examine associations between state-specific Medicaid reimbursement/eligibility policies and receipt of cancer screening. The study sample included individuals aged 21 years to 64 years who were enrolled in fee-for-service Medicaid for at least 4 months. Subsamples eligible for each screening test were: Papanicolaou test among 2,136,511 patients, mammography among 792,470 patients, colonoscopy among 769,729 patients, and fecal occult blood test among 753,868 patients. State-specific Medicaid variables included median screening test reimbursement, income/financial asset eligibility requirements, physician copayments, and frequency of eligibility renewal.
RESULTS: Increases in screening test reimbursement demonstrated mixed associations (positive and negative) with the likelihood of receiving screening tests among Medicaid beneficiaries. In contrast, increased reimbursements for office visits were found to be positively associated with the odds of receiving all screening tests examined, including colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06-1.08), fecal occult blood test (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.08-1.10), Papanicolaou test (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03), and mammography (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03). Effects of other state-specific Medicaid policies varied across the screening tests examined.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased reimbursement for office visits was consistently associated with an increased likelihood of being screened for cancer, and may be an important policy tool for increasing screening among this vulnerable population.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Papanicolaou test; access to health care; cancer screening; colonoscopy; health care disparities; health insurance reimbursement; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25154930      PMCID: PMC4788961          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Churn, churn, churn: how instability of health insurance shapes America's uninsured problem.

Authors:  Pamela Farley Short; Deborah R Graefe; Cathy Schoen
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2003-11

2.  Changes in medicaid physician fees, 1998-2003: implications for physician participation.

Authors:  Stephen Zuckerman; Joshua McFeeters; Peter Cunningham; Len Nichols
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Town; Robert Kane; Paul Johnson; Mary Butler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Screening mammography was used more, and more frequently, by longer than shorter term Medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Physician participation in Medicaid revisited.

Authors:  J B Mitchell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Existing Medicaid beneficiaries left off the Affordable Care Act's prevention bandwagon.

Authors:  Sara E Wilensky; Elizabeth A Gray
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Medicaid physician fee levels and children's access to care.

Authors:  J W Cohen; P J Cunningham
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  A L Potosky; N Breen; B I Graubard; P E Parsons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Effects of changes in incomes and practice circumstances on physicians' decisions to treat charity and Medicaid patients.

Authors:  Peter J Cunningham; Jack Hadley
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Medicare, Medicaid, and access to dermatologists: the effect of patient insurance on appointment access and wait times.

Authors:  Jack Resneck; Mark J Pletcher; Nia Lozano
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  20 in total

1.  Access to Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Beneficiaries: The Role of State Medicaid Payment Policies.

Authors:  Nan Tracy Zheng; Susan Haber; Sonja Hoover; Zhanlian Feng
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Cost-effectiveness of early cancer surveillance for patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Casey R Tak; Eman Biltaji; Wendy Kohlmann; Luke Maese; Pierre Hainaut; Anita Villani; David Malkin; Catherine M T Sherwin; Diana I Brixner; Joshua D Schiffman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  The impact of health insurance on cancer care in disadvantaged communities.

Authors:  Zaid M Abdelsattar; Samantha Hendren; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing complex surgery at quality care centers: insights into the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Erin C Hall; Chaoyi Zheng; Russell C Langan; Lynt B Johnson; Nawar Shara; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Co-payment policies and breast and cervical cancer screening in Medicaid.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Anushree M Vichare; Bassam Dahman; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Perceived effectiveness of HPV test as a primary screening modality among US providers.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Health Insurance Expansion and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Does Increased Access Lead to Improved Care?

Authors:  Andrew P Loehrer; David C Chang; Matthew M Hutter; Zirui Song; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  What does Medicaid expansion mean for cancer screening and prevention? Results from a randomized trial on the impacts of acquiring Medicaid coverage.

Authors:  Bill J Wright; Alison K Conlin; Heidi L Allen; Jennifer Tsui; Matthew J Carlson; Hsin Fang Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cancer Stage in American Indians and Alaska Natives Enrolled in Medicaid.

Authors:  Scott V Adams; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Andrew Karnopp; Aasthaa Bansal; Stacey A Cohen; Victoria Warren-Mears; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.