Literature DB >> 26650390

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis.

Nacim Bouheraoua1, Lea Jouve2, Vincent Borderie2, Laurent Laroche2.   

Abstract

Keratoconus is a bilateral and progressive corneal ectasia. In order to slow down its progression, corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has recently been introduced as an efficient treatment option. In biological and chemical sciences, crosslinking refers to new chemical bonds formed between reactive molecules. Hence, the aim of corneal collagen CXL is to synthetically increase the formation of crosslinks between collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma. Despite the fact that the efficiency of the conventional CXL (C-CXL) protocol has already been shown in several clinical studies, it might benefit from improvements in duration of the procedure and removal of corneal epithelium. Hence, in order to provide a coherent evaluation of two new and optimized CXL protocols, we studied keratoconus patients who had undergone one of the three CXL treatments: iontophoresis (I-CXL), accelerated CXL (A-CXL), and conventional CXL (C-CXL). A-CXL is a 6 time faster CXL procedure using a ten time higher UVA irradiance but still including an epithelium removal. Iontophoresis is a transepithelial non-invasive technique in which a small electric current is applied to improve riboflavin penetration throughout the cornea. Using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS OCT) and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), we conclude that regarding the depth of treatment penetration, conventional CXL protocol remains the standard for treating progressive keratoconus. Accelerated CXL seems to be a quick, effective and safe alternative to treat thin corneas. The use of iontophoresis is still being investigated and should be considered with greater caution.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26650390      PMCID: PMC4692706          DOI: 10.3791/53119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  36 in total

1.  Corneal cross-linking-induced stromal demarcation line.

Authors:  Theo Seiler; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 2.  New perspectives on keratoconus as revealed by corneal confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Nathan Efron; Joanna G Hollingsworth
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Collagen crosslinking with ultraviolet-A and hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in thin corneas.

Authors:  Farhad Hafezi; Michael Mrochen; Hans Peter Iseli; Theo Seiler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Correlation of the corneal collagen cross-linking demarcation line using confocal microscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in keratoconic patients.

Authors:  George D Kymionis; Michael A Grentzelos; Argyro D Plaka; Konstantinos I Tsoulnaras; Vasilios F Diakonis; Dimitrios A Liakopoulos; Vardhaman P Kankariya; Aristophanis I Pallikaris
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results.

Authors:  Frederik Raiskup-Wolf; Anne Hoyer; Eberhard Spoerl; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Riboflavin-UVA-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Aldo Caporossi; Cosimo Mazzotta; Stefano Baiocchi; Tomaso Caporossi; Rosario Denaro; Angelo Balestrazzi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Transient corneal endothelial changes following accelerated collagen cross-linking for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Abdullah Kürşat Cingü; Esin Sogutlu-Sari; Yasin Cınar; Muhammed Sahin; Fatih Mehmet Türkçü; Harun Yüksel; Alparslan Sahin; Ihsan Caça
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 1.820

8.  Transepithelial iontophoresis corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: initial clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; J Bradley Randleman; Vito Romano; Emanuela F Legrottaglie; Pietro Rosetta; Fabrizio I Camesasca; Raffaele Piscopo; Claudio Azzolini; Riccardo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus.

Authors:  David Touboul; Nathan Efron; David Smadja; Delphine Praud; Florence Malet; Joseph Colin
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Corneal crosslinking: riboflavin concentration in corneal stroma exposed with and without epithelium.

Authors:  Stefano Baiocchi; Cosimo Mazzotta; Daniela Cerretani; Tomaso Caporossi; Aldo Caporossi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  9 in total

1.  Standard, transepithelial and iontophoresis corneal cross-linking: clinical analysis of three surgical techniques.

Authors:  Settimio Rossi; Carmine Santamaria; Rosa Boccia; Luigi De Rosa; Francesco Maria D'Alterio; Francesca Simonelli; Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Efficacy of iontophoresis-assisted epithelium-on corneal cross-linking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Hong-Zhen Jia; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking using 0.1% riboflavin for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Hong-Zhen Jia; Xu Pang; Zheng-Jun Fan; Na Li; Gang Li; Xiu-Jun Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Gene Therapy in the Anterior Eye Segment.

Authors:  Cynthia Amador; Ruchi Shah; Sean Ghiam; Andrei A Kramerov; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.391

5.  Differences in corneal clinical findings after standard and accelerated cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Karsten U Kortuem; Efstathios Vounotrypidis; Alexandros Athanasiou; Michael Müller; Alexander Babenko; Christoph Kern; Siegfried Priglinger; Wolfgang J Mayer
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study.

Authors:  Alina Cantemir; Anisia I Alexa; Nicoleta Anton; Roxana E Ciuntu; Ciprian Danielescu; Dorin Chiselita; Danut Costin
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2017-02-03

7.  Alterations in Corneal Biomechanical and Topographic Features After Accelerated Crosslinking: 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Ahmet Kirgiz; Sevil Karaman Erdur; Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk; Kursat Atalay; Senay Asik Nacaroglu
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 8.  Potential Effects of Corneal Cross-Linking upon the Limbus.

Authors:  Johnny E Moore; Davide Schiroli; C B Tara Moore
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Transepithelial accelerated corneal crosslinking for keratoconus eyes with maximum keratometry values larger than 58 diopters.

Authors:  Ling Sun; Jing Zhao; Xiaoyu Zhang; Yang Shen; Mi Tian; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.351

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.