Literature DB >> 23347370

Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus.

David Touboul1, Nathan Efron, David Smadja, Delphine Praud, Florence Malet, Joseph Colin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare early corneal healing following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) protocols.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients with progressive keratoconus were divided into three groups to receive conventional, transepithelial, or accelerated CXL. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy was performed on each patient preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Closure of the epithelial wound was complete 3 days following conventional and accelerated CXL. The subbasal nerve plexus was essentially obliterated immediately following conventional and accelerated CXL, and virtually no nerve fibers had regenerated by 6 months. The anterior stroma showed significant changes 1 month following conventional CXL; these changes were similar but more pronounced following accelerated CXL. Observed stromal changes included complete obliteration of keratocytes, increased tissue reflectivity, a honeycomb-like appearance, and circular lacunae. Some recovery of keratocyte density was noted after 6 months. These changes were less pronounced in the mid-stroma, and there were no apparent changes to the posterior stroma or endothelium. The cornea appeared to be unaltered following transepithelial CXL.
CONCLUSIONS: In vivo corneal confocal microscopy analysis of the postoperative impact of CXL on the cornea revealed clear differences among conventional, accelerated, and transepithelial CXL protocols. Accelerated CXL had a greater impact than conventional CXL on the anterior cornea, whereas transepithelial CXL did not appear to alter corneal morphology. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23347370     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20121016-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  38 in total

1.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT.

Authors:  C Mazzotta; C Traversi; S Caragiuli; M Rechichi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Spatially heterogeneous corneal mechanical responses before and after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A crosslinking.

Authors:  Joel R Palko; Junhua Tang; Benjamin Cruz Perez; Xueliang Pan; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Comparison of corneal keratocytes before and after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Naeim Aminifard; Hoda Khallaghi; Mahdi Mohammadi; Reza Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? Yes.

Authors:  M Tsatsos; C MacGregor; N Kopsachilis; D Anderson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Is accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus the way forward? No.

Authors:  C MacGregor; M Tsatsos; P Hossain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Tear function and ocular surface changes following corneal collagen cross-linking treatment in keratoconus patients: 18-month results.

Authors:  Betul Seher Uysal; Emine Akcay; Aydan Kilicarslan; Melek Mutlu; Gozde Hondur; Pinar Kosekahya; Nurullah Cagil
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis.

Authors:  Nacim Bouheraoua; Lea Jouve; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Males; D Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.