Literature DB >> 26650118

Easy and Accurate Mechano-profiling on Micropost Arrays.

Nils Goedecke1, Maja Bollhalder1, Remo Bernet1, Unai Silvan1, Jess Snedeker2.   

Abstract

Cell culture substrates with integrated flexible microposts enable a user to study the mechanical interactions between cells and their immediate surroundings. Particularly, cell-substrate interactions are the main interest. Today micropost arrays are a well-characterized and established method with a broad range of applications that have been published over the last decade. However, there seems to be a reservation among biologists to adapt the technique due to the lengthy and challenging process of micropost manufacture along with the lack of easily approachable software for analyzing images of cells interacting with microposts. The force read-out from microposts is surprisingly easy. A micropost acts like a spring with the cell ideally attached at its tip. Depending on size a cell applies force from its cytoskeleton through one or multiple focal adhesion points to the micropost, thus deflecting the micropost. The amount of deflection correlates directly to the applied force in direction and in magnitude. The number of microposts covered by a cell and the post deflection patterns are characteristic and allow determination of values like force per post and many biologically relevant parameters that allow "mechano-profiling" of cell phenotypes. A convenient method for mechano-profiling is described here combining the first generation of ready-to-use commercially available microposts with an in-house developed software package that is now accessible to all researchers. As a demonstration of typical application, single images of bone cancer cells were taken in bright-field microscopy for mechano-profiling of cell line models of metastasis. This combination of commercial traction force sensors and open source software for analysis allows for the first time a rapid implementation of the micropost array technique into routine lab work done by non-expert users. Furthermore, a robust and streamlined analysis process enables a user to analyze a large number of micropost images in a highly time-efficient manner.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26650118      PMCID: PMC4692730          DOI: 10.3791/53350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  16 in total

1.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force.

Authors:  John L Tan; Joe Tien; Dana M Pirone; Darren S Gray; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Biochemical and biomechanical gradients for directed bone marrow stromal cell differentiation toward tendon and bone.

Authors:  Ram I Sharma; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  A novel method for assessing adherent single-cell stiffness in tension: design and testing of a substrate-based live cell functional imaging device.

Authors:  Guido Bartalena; Reto Grieder; Ram I Sharma; Tomaso Zambelli; Roman Muff; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.838

4.  Shear force at the cell-matrix interface: enhanced analysis for microfabricated post array detectors.

Authors:  Christopher A Lemmon; Nathan J Sniadecki; Sami Alom Ruiz; John L Tan; Lewis H Romer; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Mech Chem Biosyst       Date:  2005

5.  Microfabricated post-array-detectors (mPADs): an approach to isolate mechanical forces.

Authors:  Ravi Desai; Michael Yang; Nathan Sniadecki; Wesley Legant; Christopher Chen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Live-cell subcellular measurement of cell stiffness using a microengineered stretchable micropost array membrane.

Authors:  Raymond H W Lam; Shinuo Weng; Wei Lu; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Micropatterning on micropost arrays.

Authors:  Nathan J Sniadecki; Sangyoon J Han; Lucas H Ting; Shirin Feghhi
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.441

8.  Probing cellular traction forces by micropillar arrays: contribution of substrate warping to pillar deflection.

Authors:  Ingmar Schoen; Wei Hu; Enrico Klotzsch; Viola Vogel
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Assaying stem cell mechanobiology on microfabricated elastomeric substrates with geometrically modulated rigidity.

Authors:  Michael T Yang; Jianping Fu; Yang-Kao Wang; Ravi A Desai; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration.

Authors:  Olivia du Roure; Alexandre Saez; Axel Buguin; Robert H Austin; Philippe Chavrier; Pascal Silberzan; Pascal Siberzan; Benoit Ladoux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Elastomeric sensor surfaces for high-throughput single-cell force cytometry.

Authors:  Ivan Pushkarsky; Peter Tseng; Dylan Black; Bryan France; Lyndon Warfe; Cynthia J Koziol-White; William F Jester; Ryan K Trinh; Jonathan Lin; Philip O Scumpia; Sherie L Morrison; Reynold A Panettieri; Robert Damoiseaux; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 2.  Potential theranostics of circulating tumor cells and tumor-derived exosomes application in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Somayeh Vafaei; Raheleh Roudi; Zahra Madjd; Amir Reza Aref; Marzieh Ebrahimi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  Myosin II governs intracellular pressure and traction by distinct tropomyosin-dependent mechanisms.

Authors:  Kimheak Sao; Tia M Jones; Andrew D Doyle; Debonil Maity; Galina Schevzov; Yun Chen; Peter W Gunning; Ryan J Petrie
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.