Literature DB >> 21120698

A novel method for assessing adherent single-cell stiffness in tension: design and testing of a substrate-based live cell functional imaging device.

Guido Bartalena1, Reto Grieder, Ram I Sharma, Tomaso Zambelli, Roman Muff, Jess G Snedeker.   

Abstract

Various micro-devices have been used to assess single cell mechanical properties. Here, we designed and implemented a novel, mechanically actuated, two dimensional cell culture system that enables a measure of cell stiffness based on quantitative functional imaging of cell-substrate interaction. Based on parametric finite element design analysis, we fabricated a soft (5 kPa) polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cell substrate coated with collagen-I and fluorescent micro-beads, thus providing a favorable terrain for cell adhesion and for substrate deformation quantification, respectively. We employed a real-time tracking system that analyzes high magnification images of living cells under stretch, and compensates for gross substrate motions by dynamic adjustment of the microscope stage. Digital image correlation (DIC) was used to quantify substrate deformation beneath and surrounding the cell, leading to an estimate of cell stiffness based upon the ability of the cell to resist the applied substrate deformation. Sensitivity of the system was tested using chemical treatments to both "soften" and "stiffen" the cell cytoskeleton with either 0.5 μg/ml Cytochalasin-D or 3% Glutaraldehyde, respectively. Results indicate that untreated osteosarcoma cells (SAOS-2) exhibit a 1.5 ± 0.7% difference in strain from an applied target substrate strain of 8%. Compared to untreated cells, those treated with Cyochalasin-D passively followed the substrate (0.5 ± 0.5%, p < 0.001), whereas Glutaraldehyde enhanced cellular stiffness and the ability to resist the substrate deformation (2.9 ± 1.6%, p < 0.001). Nano-indentation testing showed differences in cell stiffness based on culture treatment, consistent with DIC findings. Our results indicate that mechanics and image analysis approaches do hold promise as a method to quantitatively assess tensile cell constitutive properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21120698     DOI: 10.1007/s10544-010-9493-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  7 in total

1.  Easy and Accurate Mechano-profiling on Micropost Arrays.

Authors:  Nils Goedecke; Maja Bollhalder; Remo Bernet; Unai Silvan; Jess Snedeker
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  TENSCell: Imaging of Stretch-Activated Cells Reveals Divergent Nuclear Behavior and Tension.

Authors:  Benjamin Seelbinder; Adrienne K Scott; Isabel Nelson; Stephanie E Schneider; Kristin Calahan; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Supracellular measurement of spatially varying mechanical heterogeneities in live monolayers.

Authors:  Alexandra Bermudez; Zachary Gonzalez; Bao Zhao; Ethan Salter; Xuanqing Liu; Leixin Ma; Mohammad Khalid Jawed; Cho-Jui Hsieh; Neil Y C Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  Bio-Functionalized Ultra-Thin, Large-Area and Waterproof Silicone Membranes for Biomechanical Cellular Loading and Compliance Experiments.

Authors:  Karya Uysal; Till Creutz; Ipek Seda Firat; Gerhard M Artmann; Nicole Teusch; Aysegül Temiz Artmann
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Focus on time: dynamic imaging reveals stretch-dependent cell relaxation and nuclear deformation.

Authors:  Aron N Horvath; Andreas A Ziegler; Stephan Gerhard; Claude N Holenstein; Benjamin Beyeler; Jess G Snedeker; Unai Silvan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Development of polydimethylsiloxane substrates with tunable elastic modulus to study cell mechanobiology in muscle and nerve.

Authors:  Rachelle N Palchesko; Ling Zhang; Yan Sun; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Confocal reference free traction force microscopy.

Authors:  Martin Bergert; Tobias Lendenmann; Manuel Zündel; Alexander E Ehret; Daniele Panozzo; Patrizia Richner; David K Kim; Stephan J P Kress; David J Norris; Olga Sorkine-Hornung; Edoardo Mazza; Dimos Poulikakos; Aldo Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.