Literature DB >> 26649514

Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report.

Wayne O Olsen.   

Abstract

The large study undertaken by Pearsons et al. (1977) for the Environmental Protection Agency nicely demonstrates "usual" speech levels in a variety of settings in classrooms, homes, hospitals, department stores, and commercial transportation. In most settings, speech levels were between 55 and 66 dBA at conversation distances in the school, home, hospital, and department store environments. S/N ratios on the order of 5 to 15 dB were maintained.Communication distance in the trains and airplanes was considerably less than the usual 1 m, and the speech levels were higher, 73 to 77 dBA, but still at a -1 or -2 dB S/N ratio in the train and airplanes, respectively. Their measurements in an anechoic chamber further reflected the levels of conversational speech in a quiet environment, as well as the levels and spectra for different vocal efforts by females, males, and children. Speech spectra were generally similar for the groups of talkers for casual conversation through raised vocal efforts. For loud speech, and particularly for shouted speech, male speech levels were greater than the speech levels of the females and children. The maximum one-third octave bands for loud and shouted speech shifted to higher frequencies for all three groups.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 26649514     DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(1998/012)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Audiol        ISSN: 1059-0889            Impact factor:   1.493


  35 in total

1.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Remote Microphone Technology for Children with Hearing Loss or Auditory Processing Issues.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Benjamin Kirby; Sharon Miller
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 3.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

4.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Marjorie R Leek; Judy R Dubno; David J Wark; Pamela E Souza; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].

Authors:  U Hoppe; A Hast
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  The effects of varying contextual demands on age-related positive gaze preferences.

Authors:  Soo Rim Noh; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06

9.  Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.

Authors:  Neil S Hockley; Frauke Bahlmann; Bernadette Fulton
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-09

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.