Literature DB >> 26649089

C-reactive protein is a predictor of complications after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: five-year experience.

Eligijus Poskus1, Ignas Karnusevicius2, Gintare Andreikaite2, Saulius Mikalauskas1, Tomas Poskus1, Kestutis Strupas1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the development and improvement of laparoscopic surgery, procedures have become common. However, post-operative complications occur when patients are released from hospital. These complications increase patients' morbidity and mortality. They also lead to re-hospitalization, an extended recovery period, and an increase in the cost of treatment. AIM: To evaluate and determine the prognostic properties of C-reactive protein in the early diagnosis of postoperative complications after a laparoscopic colon resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery in 2010-2014. The patients were divided into two groups - uncomplicated ones and those with complications. C-reactive protein concentrations in their blood serum were measured on the 2(nd), 4(th) and 6(th) day after surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relation between C-reactive protein values measured on the 2(nd), 4(th) and 6(th) postoperative day and related complications. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each C-reactive protein value measured on the 2(nd), 4(th) and 6(th) postoperative day.
RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were included in the trial; 14 of them had complications. On the second day, a C-reactive protein cut-off value of 88.6 mmol/l provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting evolving complications, being 71.4% and 84.8% respectively (p = 0.003). The significant predictive cut-off value decreases and becomes more sensitive and specific each post-operative day.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect developing post-operative complications early on by monitoring C-reactive protein concentration levels in the blood serum on the 2(nd), 4(th), and 6(th) post-operative days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; colorectal; laparoscopic

Year:  2015        PMID: 26649089      PMCID: PMC4653262          DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne        ISSN: 1895-4588            Impact factor:   1.195


Introduction

With the development and improvement of laparoscopic surgery, procedures have become common. However, post-operative complications occur when patients are released from hospital. These complications increase patients’ morbidity and mortality; they also lead to re-hospitalization, an extended recovery period, and an increase in the cost of treatment [1-4]. Research which was carried out shows the direct benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to open colorectal surgery [5-8]. Complications develop immediately after laparoscopic surgery or within a certain period of time. Thus, these complications can be unnoticed and not diagnosed in time. Both open and laparoscopic colorectal resection surgery causes trauma to the body, provoking an immune response. However, the bodily response is weaker during laparoscopic surgery, and it allows for the identification of complications induced by changes in the immune system, which can go unnoticed during open surgery due to the active immune response [9-11]. Serum markers are sufficiently sensitive and allow for prediction of early developing complications. During surgery, when tissues are damaged, certain cytokines are released: tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β. The release of cytokines correlates with the extent of surgery [12-14]. The above-mentioned cytokines promote C-reactive protein (CRP) synthesis in the liver. Because of its short half-life, this protein is useful as a diagnostic indicator, predicting activity of diseases, the inflammatory response, and the post-operative course. In addition, the detection of this protein is inexpensive and readily available [15, 16]. C-reactive protein is considered to be an indicator of adverse post-operative course, which includes both surgical and non-surgical complications [17]. The aim of this research is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CRP as well as its predictive properties in early diagnosis of developing complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Timely diagnosis of these complications and early treatment will help to avoid life-threatening situations.

Aim

The aim of the study was to evaluate and determine the prognostic properties of CRP in the early diagnosis of postoperative complications after a laparoscopic colon resection.

Material and methods

One hundred and six patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic colorectal resection between 2010 and 2014 at Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics 1st Abdominal Surgery Department were the subjects of the research. Complications were diagnosed by daily examination of patients during the post-operative period, and were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo surgical complication classification. We graded the following complications: infection, fistula/leakage, bleeding/haematoma, impaired gastrointestinal motility/nausea/vomiting, cardiopulmonary, liver failure, neurological, pain, allergy, pancreatitis and other complications. According to the complications mentioned above, all patients were divided into two groups: uncomplicated and with complications. C-reactive protein concentrations were measured by using an automated analytic system with a reference range of < 5 mmol/l. C-reactive protein reaction concentrations in the blood serum were measured on the 2nd, 4th and 6th postoperative days. We also analysed demographics, operative data, and diagnoses.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 21 software. Categorical data were reported as a number (percentage) of patients. To define the distribution, continuous variables were explored for skewness and kurtosis. Normally distributed continuous variables were reported as the mean with a standard deviation and non-normally distributed continuous variables were reported as the median with a range of minimum and maximum values. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relation between CRP values measured on the 2nd, 4th and 6th day after the resection and the presence of post-operative complications. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were determined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine sensitivity and specificity of each CRP value measured on the 2nd, 4th and 6th postoperative day. Cut-off values with the highest sensitivity and specificity were determined for each day by using the Youden index. The level of statistical significance was defined by p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The study included 106 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection. Complications developed in 14 (13.2%) patients. The remaining 92 patients did not develop any complications (86.8%). The average age in the group without complications (64.9 ±11.6) was slightly higher than in the group with complications (60.2 ±10.4) (Table I). 64.2% of subjects were women, while 35.8% were men. The main reasons for resection were adenocarcinoma (85.8%), diverticulosis (5.7%), and adenoma (3.8%). According to the location it was a disease of the sigma (48.1%), rectum (35.8%), and ascending colon (5.7%) (Figure 1). The most common complications were 6 surgical site infections (5.7%) and 4 anastomotic leakages (3.8%).
Table I

Demographics, operative data

ParameterTotalUncomplicatedComplications
N 1069214
Age [years]64.3 ±11.564.9 ±11.660.2 ±10.4
Male: female38: 6831: 617: 7
Length of stay [days]9 (5–34)8 (5–17)15.5 (10–34)
Operation time [min]160 (100–380)171.3 ±43.6*155 (100–380)
Estimated blood loss [ml]50 (0–500)50 (0–500)75 (10–300)
Resection length [cm]30 (12–80)30 (12–80)30 (20–70)

All data are presented as n, except for length of stay, operation time, estimated blood loss and operation time, which is presented as median with range. Age is presented as mean with standard deviation.

Operation time for uncomplicated group is presented as mean with standard deviation.

Figure 1

Location map of the colon disease

Full circle – adenocarcinoma; empty circle – adenoma; lozenge – diverticulosis; square – neuroendocrine tumour; pyramid – obstipation; inverted pyramid – endometriosis.

Location map of the colon disease Full circle – adenocarcinoma; empty circle – adenoma; lozenge – diverticulosis; square – neuroendocrine tumour; pyramid – obstipation; inverted pyramid – endometriosis. Demographics, operative data All data are presented as n, except for length of stay, operation time, estimated blood loss and operation time, which is presented as median with range. Age is presented as mean with standard deviation. Operation time for uncomplicated group is presented as mean with standard deviation. A statistically significant difference of CRP levels between the uncomplicated group and the group with complications was identified during all days of analysis. The biggest difference was on the 4th post-operative day (44.3 ±36.4 vs. 147.6 ±91.3; p < 0.001). C-reactive protein levels become significant in predicting complications from the second post-operative day (OR = 1.007; 95% CI: 0.979–1.036; p < 0.001) (Table II). On the second day, a CRP cut-off value of 88.6 mmol/l provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting evolving complications, being 71.4% and 84.8% respectively (p = 0.003). The significant predictive cut-off value decreases and becomes more sensitive and specific during each post-operative day (Table III).
Table II

Predicting complications by routinely measuring CRP level

PODCRP [mmol/l]
Odds ratio95% Confidence intervalValue of p*
21.0070.979–1.036< 0.001
40.9820.953–1.011< 0.001
61.0711.021–1.123< 0.001

POD – Postoperative day, CRP – C-reactive protein

p – values are based on logistic regression analysis.

Table III

Sensitivity and specificity of significant CRP cut-off values for identifying complications after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery

PODCut-offSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)JAUCValue of p
288.671.484.80.5620.7450.003
466.278.678.30.5690.846< 0.001
659.985.795.70.8140.918< 0.001

POD – Postoperative day, CRP – C-reactive protein, J – Youden index, AUC – area under the curve.

Predicting complications by routinely measuring CRP level POD – Postoperative day, CRPC-reactive protein p – values are based on logistic regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of significant CRP cut-off values for identifying complications after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery POD – Postoperative day, CRPC-reactive protein, J – Youden index, AUC – area under the curve.

Discussion

The research that was undertaken and the collected data prove that long-term results after laparoscopic colorectal resection are the same as those after an open colorectal resection. However, having assessed short-term results, it has been noted that results are better after laparoscopic colorectal surgery than after open surgery [18, 19]. With the development of laparoscopic surgery, the recovery of patients has accelerated and the duration of hospitalization has decreased. However, when discharging patients earlier, developing complications may go unnoticed. It is the main task to diagnose the complications which are mentioned above early so as to reduce their consequences, but in everyday practice the diagnosis is often delayed. It is particularly important to detect a developing anastomotic leakage in time. This is a serious complication, which must be diagnosed as soon as possible in order to avoid its associated morbidity and mortality [20, 21]. A rapid and reliable diagnostic method is needed, which allows the early detection of developing complications, so that patients can be safely discharged from hospital and prevented from having the complications mentioned above. Serum markers can provide information about the developing inflammatory processes in the body. C-reactive protein was examined as a potential indicator of developing septic complications after open colorectal surgery [17, 22–25]. According to the study of Buunen et al., CRP levels > 145 mg/l on the 4th postoperative day after rectum or colon surgery have the highest specificity and sensitivity for developing septic complications [17]. Based on the study by Korner et al. [23], CRP levels with the highest sensitivity and specificity are claimed to be on the third post-operative day when the concentration of the protein was > 190 mg/l. According to the study by Ortega-Deballon et al. [26], patients with CRP levels on the third postoperative day > 125 mg/l should not be released from hospital. The sensitivity of CRP on the third post-operative day was 81.2% and the negative prognostic value was 95.8%. The above-mentioned studies evaluated CRP concentrations only in open colorectal resection surgery. A study published in 2014, which was carried out by Adamina et al. [27], analysed patients after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It proved that the mean value of CRP with the highest sensitivity and specificity for development of infectious complications was 56 mg/l on the 6th post-operative day. The sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 0.8–1), specificity was 46% (95% CI: 0.4–0.6), and diagnostic accuracy was 78% (95% CI: 0.7–0.9). We can compare the above-mentioned study to this study, because it also included patients only after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. C-reactive protein belongs to the group of acute phase proteins, which are synthesized in the liver. The production of this protein is provoked by cytokines. It is important to mention that levels of CRP in the serum begin to rise 4–12 h after the beginning of pathophysiological processes in the body. In order to use CRP to identify developing septic complications, we need to determine the diagnostic value of this protein in the blood serum. In the above-mentioned articles, the protein values range from 56 to 190 mg/l. In the current study, the obtained CRP values are much lower, because it only included laparoscopic colorectal resection surgery. On the 2nd post-operative day, a CRP value of 88.6 mg/l had the highest sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (84.8%). On the fourth post-operative day the protein value of 66.2 mg/l had the highest sensitivity (78.6%) and specificity (78.3%). On the sixth post-operative day, the CRP value of 59.9 mg/l had a 85.7% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity. Thus, with each day we can predict more accurately whether the complications are developing. However, a presumption about the developing complications cannot be based only on the concentration of CRP. The protein concentration may increase in response to the mechanical tissue damage. Its levels also rise with other various diseases (oncology, connective tissue diseases, rheumatism, tuberculosis, pathological obesity) [17, 18]. Increased levels of protein after laparoscopic colorectal resection surgery will indicate the need to conduct a more detailed follow-up examination of the patient (ultrasound, endoscopy, MRI and others). Then, it will help to avoid the potential negative consequences of post-operative complications.

Conclusions

Developing post-operative complications can be detected early on by monitoring CRP concentration levels in the blood serum on the 2nd, 4th, and 6th post-operative days, which is very important for safe and early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
  27 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Monitoring c-reactive protein after laparoscopic colorectal surgery excludes infectious complications and allows for safe and early discharge.

Authors:  Michel Adamina; Rene Warschkow; Franziska Näf; Bianka Hummel; Thomas Rduch; Jochen Lange; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections.

Authors:  J Ordemann; C A Jacobi; W Schwenk; R Stösslein; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Graham Branagan; Derek Finnis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Ming-Jium Shieh; Chiung-Nien Chen; Yung-Ming Cheng; King-Jen Chang; Shih-Ming Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-01-18       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection.

Authors:  K A Zucker; D E Pitcher; D T Martin; R S Ford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery.

Authors:  T Welsch; S A Müller; A Ulrich; A Kischlat; U Hinz; P Kienle; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; B M Schmied
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  C-reactive protein: the best laboratory indicator available for monitoring disease activity.

Authors:  S D Deodhar
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Anti-inflammatory and immune regulatory effects of acupuncture after craniotomy: study protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Yeon Cho; Seung-Bo Yang; Hee Sup Shin; Seung Hwan Lee; Jun Seok Koh; Seungwon Kwon; Woo-Sang Jung; Sang-Kwan Moon; Jung-Mi Park; Chang-Nam Ko; Seong-Uk Park
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Serum cytokines in early prediction of anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection.

Authors:  Marek Zawadzki; Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka; Andrzej Gamian; Wojciech Witkiewicz
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Use of inflammatory markers in the early detection of infectious complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with the ERAS protocol.

Authors:  Mateusz Wierdak; Magdalena Pisarska; Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala; Michał Kisielewski; Piotr Major; Jan S Witowski; Piotr Ceranowicz; Marcin Strzałka; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and its impact on long-term survival in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marius Kryzauskas; Augustinas Bausys; Austeja Elzbieta Degutyte; Vilius Abeciunas; Eligijus Poskus; Rimantas Bausys; Audrius Dulskas; Kestutis Strupas; Tomas Poskus
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  The problem of colorectal anastomosis safety.

Authors:  Marius Kryzauskas; Eligijus Poskus; Audrius Dulskas; Augustinas Bausys; Matas Jakubauskas; Ugne Imbrasaite; Gabija Makunaite; Justas Kuliavas; Rimantas Bausys; Eugenijus Stratilatovas; Kestutis Strupas; Tomas Poskus
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.