Literature DB >> 1357253

Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients.

J R Monson1, A Darzi, P D Carey, P J Guillou.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic technology is likely to have an increasing impact on surgical procedures that have previously required an open approach. We have prospectively evaluated laparoscopic colectomy in 40 patients requiring elective colonic excision mainly for malignant disease. 33 of 40 patients had a successfully completed laparoscopic colectomy, although there was one postoperative death. Seven operations were unsuccessful and required conversion to conventional open laparotomy. Morbidity was low with no wound infections and only two chest infections in the 32 survivors. Early mobilisation and discharge from hospital (mean 8 days) was a notable feature. Previous abdominal surgery was not an absolute contraindication to laparoscopic colectomy. However, the inability to palpate the colon directly to confirm the site of laparoscopically impalpable lesions leads us to recommend contrast radiology to confirm the location of colonoscopically diagnosed lesions before laparoscopically assisted colectomy. Preliminary pathological assessment of resected tumour specimens revealed a satisfactory tumour clearance. We conclude that laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible operation in most patients and leads to a substantial patient benefit without compromising the chance of a surgical cure of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1357253     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92694-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  47 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  K L Leung; S P Kwok; W Y Lau; W C Meng; C C Chung; P B Lai; K H Kwong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K L Leung; P B Lai; R L Ho; W C Meng; R Y Yiu; J F Lee; W Y Lau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview.

Authors:  D W Meijer; J J Bannenberg; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal cancer with preservation of anal sphincter: a report of 82 cases.

Authors:  Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhao Wang; Yong-Yang Yu; Ye Shu; Zhong Cheng; Li Li; Wen-Zhang Lei; Tian-Cai Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin; S G Docimo; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  S D Wexner; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; M Bernstein; N Geron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Han; Woo Yong Lee; Chi-Min Park; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up.

Authors:  G C Hoffman; J W Baker; J B Doxey; G W Hubbard; W K Ruffin; J A Wishner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience.

Authors:  G C Hoffman; J W Baker; C W Fitchett; J H Vansant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.