Literature DB >> 26648671

Role of Coronary Calcium Scoring in the Assessment of Physiological Ischemia in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis.

Kazunori Horie1, Yuichi Kikuchi2, Kaname Takizawa1, Naoto Inoue1.   

Abstract

Although coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an established marker of coronary atherosclerosis, whether it also reflects the physiological significance is unknown. This study aims to evaluate if CAC could indicate physiological ischemia in intermediate stenosis defined by an invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). CAC score (CACS) derived from either whole coronary arteries or individual arteries was measured by computed tomography among patients with intermediate de novo lesions (percent diameter stenosis from 30% to less than 70%). All stenoses were evaluated by invasive FFR; lesions with an FFR ≤ 0.80 were considered significant. We enrolled 119 patients with 143 lesions. Of these, 42 lesions (29.4%) demonstrated significant ischemia by FFR measurement. FFR values had modest but significant correlations with CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis (r = - 0.290; p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CACS of individual arteries with intermediate stenosis had 71.4% sensitivity and 67.3% specificity as a predictor of significant ischemia at a cut off value of 145.9. Multivariable analysis showed that percent diameter stenosis and CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis were independent predictors for significant ischemia. By net reclassification improvement analysis, CACS in individual arteries with intermediate stenosis provided incremental prediction for significant ischemia over minimum lumen diameter, percent diameter stenosis, and lesion length. CACS measured in each artery, but not the total CACS, provides additional information as to whether an angiographically intermediate stenosis within the artery is significant enough to cause myocardial ischemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTCA; coronary artery disease; coronary calcification; fractional flow reserve; intermediate stenosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26648671      PMCID: PMC4656160          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1554943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques.

Authors:  Shaoxiong Zhang; David C Levin; Ethan J Halpern; David Fischman; Michael Savage; Paul Walinsky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography and calcium score for major adverse cardiac events in outpatients.

Authors:  Zhi-hui Hou; Bin Lu; Yang Gao; Shi-liang Jiang; Yang Wang; Wei Li; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

4.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms.

Authors:  J H Reiber; P W Serruys; C J Kooijman; W Wijns; C J Slager; J J Gerbrands; J C Schuurbiers; A den Boer; P G Hugenholtz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Sung Shine Shim; Yookyung Kim; Soo Mee Lim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "Normal" coronary angiography.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; F Hersbach; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; J W Bech; G R Heyndrickx; K L Gould; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy.

Authors:  J A Rumberger; R S Schwartz; D B Simons; P F Sheedy; W D Edwards; L A Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.

Authors:  Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry).

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Daniel Berman; Matthew Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Benjamin J W Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Millie Gomez; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; James K Min; Gil Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Aggregate plaque volume by coronary computed tomography angiography is superior and incremental to luminal narrowing for diagnosis of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Aryeh Shalev; Joon-Hyung Doh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Heidi Gransar; Millie J Gomez; Jonathon Leipsic; Hyung-Bok Park; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Gai's Plaque Score and Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Chuang Zhang; Shuang Yang; Lu-Yue Gai; Zhi-Qi Han; Qian Xin; Xiao-Bo Yang; Jun-Jie Yang; Qin-Hua Jin
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.