Literature DB >> 19020235

Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques.

Shaoxiong Zhang1, David C Levin, Ethan J Halpern, David Fischman, Michael Savage, Paul Walinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because of beam-hardening and blooming artifacts, it is difficult to determine the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques at coronary CT angiography (CTA). Our goal was to determine how accurate coronary CTA is in evaluating these lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients who had one or more calcified coronary artery plaques at coronary CTA underwent invasive coronary angiography. The size of the calcified coronary artery plaques was graded subjectively as small, moderate, or large. Using postprocessing techniques such as segmentation and tracking, we attempted to determine whether the calcified lesions were obstructive (> or = 50% diameter narrowing) or nonobstructive (< 50% diameter narrowing). Concordance with invasive coronary angiography was then determined.
RESULTS: Calcified coronary artery plaques were graded by coronary CTA as small at 61 locations, moderate at 22 locations, and large at 43 locations. Of the 61 small calcified coronary artery plaques, 5% were obstructive at invasive coronary angiography; of the 22 moderate-sized calcified coronary artery plaques, 14% were obstructive; and of the 43 large calcified coronary artery plaques, 42% were obstructive. Concordance between coronary CTA and invasive coronary angiography occurred in 58 of 61 (95%) small calcified coronary artery plaques, 20 of 22 (91%) moderate-sized coronary artery plaques, and 29 of 43 (67%) large coronary artery plaques. Coronary CTA underestimated the degree of stenosis in one small calcified coronary artery plaque but overestimated the degree of stenosis in two small, two moderate, and 14 large coronary artery plaques. In detecting obstructive lesions caused by the 43 large calcified coronary artery plaques, coronary CTA had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, positive predictive value of 56%, negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 67%.
CONCLUSION: Coronary CTA can be used to accurately predict the presence of obstructive disease in > 90% of small and moderate-sized calcified coronary artery plaques. With large calcified coronary artery plaques, CTA correctly predicts the presence of obstructive disease in approximately two thirds of the cases. When errors occur, they are usually due to overestimation of the degree of stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020235     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.4026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  25 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of coronary calcium on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) scans: effect on interpretation and possible solutions.

Authors:  Makmur Andrew; Hoe John
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Correlation between low tube voltage in dual source CT coronary artery imaging with image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Zi-Qiao Lei; Ping Han; Hai-Bo Xu; Jian-Ming Yu; Hong-Li Liu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-19

Review 3.  Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jawdat Abdulla; Kasper S Pedersen; Matthew Budoff; Klaus F Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Pulse Wave Imaging in Carotid Artery Stenosis Human Patients in Vivo.

Authors:  Ronny X Li; Iason Z Apostolakis; Paul Kemper; Matthew D J McGarry; Ada Ip; Edward S Connolly; James F McKinsey; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial.

Authors:  Andrea L Vavere; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Melvin E Clouse; David E Bush; John W M Hoe; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; João A C Lima; Julie M Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Coronary CT angiography in patients with high calcium score: evaluation of plaque characteristics and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Mi Jung Park; Jung Im Jung; Yun-Seok Choi; Soe Hee Ann; Ho-Joong Youn; Gyeong Nyeo Jeon; Ho Cheol Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Improved Calcium Scoring at Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography Using a High-Z Contrast Element and Novel Material Separation Technique.

Authors:  Jack W Lambert; Yuxin Sun; Karen G Ordovas; Robert G Gould; Sizhe Wang; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Blooming Artifact Reduction in Coronary Artery Calcification by A New De-blooming Algorithm: Initial Study.

Authors:  Ping Li; Lei Xu; Lin Yang; Rui Wang; Jiang Hsieh; Zhonghua Sun; Zhanming Fan; Jonathon A Leipsic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Diagnostic performance of calcification-suppressed coronary CT angiography using rapid kilovolt-switching dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Hiroto Yunaga; Yasutoshi Ohta; Yasuhiro Kaetsu; Shinichiro Kitao; Tomomi Watanabe; Yoshiyuki Furuse; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Elevated levels of circulating DNA and chromatin are independently associated with severe coronary atherosclerosis and a prothrombotic state.

Authors:  Julian I Borissoff; Ivo A Joosen; Mathijs O Versteylen; Alexander Brill; Tobias A Fuchs; Alexander S Savchenko; Maureen Gallant; Kimberly Martinod; Hugo Ten Cate; Leonard Hofstra; Harry J Crijns; Denisa D Wagner; Bas L J H Kietselaer
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.